red flag laws: if the law is not intended for gun confiscation:

[bigrebnc1775]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

 

[colfax_m]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns

 

[Circe]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns

Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns

Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.

really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.
the accused is free to do whatever they want and pick another weapon to harm with
Again its about firearm confiscation and nothing else.

 

[Hellbilly]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns

Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.

really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.
the accused is free to do whatever they want and pick another weapon to harm with
Again its about firearm confiscation and nothing else.

Some people should not own guns.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns

Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.

really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.
the accused is free to do whatever they want and pick another weapon to harm with
Again its about firearm confiscation and nothing else.

Some people should not own guns.

if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public

 

[Hellbilly]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns

Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.

really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.
the accused is free to do whatever they want and pick another weapon to harm with
Again its about firearm confiscation and nothing else.

Some people should not own guns.

if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public

They should also get the help they need so they can walk about freely.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns

Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.

really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.
the accused is free to do whatever they want and pick another weapon to harm with
Again its about firearm confiscation and nothing else.

Some people should not own guns.

if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public

They should also get the help they need so they can walk about freely.

If that's true why nothing about confinement and observation?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

The law is not intended for gun confiscation; to argue otherwise is a lie.

 

[colfax_m]

if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public

That makes no sense.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

The law is not intended for gun confiscation; to argue otherwise is a lie.

oh but it is since there is no provision to confine the accused for observation
and yes that is the intention

 

[bigrebnc1775]

if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public

That makes no sense.

if you're not to be trusted with a gun you should not be trusted to live without a caregiver by your side what's your IQ less than 70?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns

Another lie – no one’s rights are being ‘deprived.’

 

[colfax_m]

if you're not to be trusted with a gun you should not be trusted to live without a caregiver by your side what's your IQ less than 70?

Do you trust children to carry guns around?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public

Your ignorance of the law, as well as your dishonesty and lying, comes as no surprise.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?

Impractical.

Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns

Another lie – no one’s rights are being ‘deprived.’

Liar
now that's a lie what happened to due process?
and again why no provision for confinement and observation?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

if you're not to be trusted with a gun you should not be trusted to live without a caregiver by your side what's your IQ less than 70?

Do you trust children to carry guns around?

Children have caregivers next

 

[Hellbilly]

If that's true why nothing about confinement and observation?

that would be part of them getting the help they need which is why we need Universal Healthcare.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public

Your ignorance of the law, as well as your dishonesty and lying, comes as no surprise.

No your blant stupidity on the law is relevant
I'll ask again
Why is there no provision in those laws for Confinement and observation of the accused?