Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Considering he kept her "hush" for YEARS before ever running for President I'd say it certainly isn't political.If, historically, the FEC has said this sort of payment isn't a campaign contribution, cite the historic cases....
From everything I understand, it's going to come down to intent. Was the payment for personal or political reasons.
Would you not agree?
The timing is likely based on her greed but that is just a guess. No more or less accurate than your assumptionsConsidering he kept her "hush" for YEARS before ever running for President I'd say it certainly isn't political.If, historically, the FEC has said this sort of payment isn't a campaign contribution, cite the historic cases....
From everything I understand, it's going to come down to intent. Was the payment for personal or political reasons.
Would you not agree?
The timing of the payments (weeks before the election) and Guliani's statements put that in question.
"Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the, you know, last debate with Hillary Clinton,”
Mine are based on public evidence and statements while yours are based on a desire for it to be true.The timing is likely based on her greed but that is just a guess. No more or less accurate than your assumptionsConsidering he kept her "hush" for YEARS before ever running for President I'd say it certainly isn't political.If, historically, the FEC has said this sort of payment isn't a campaign contribution, cite the historic cases....
From everything I understand, it's going to come down to intent. Was the payment for personal or political reasons.
Would you not agree?
The timing of the payments (weeks before the election) and Guliani's statements put that in question.
"Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the, you know, last debate with Hillary Clinton,”
That's ridiculous, Tramp as John Baron would BRAG about his peccadilloes before he ran for office never giving a second thought about his family or business.There’s all kinds of reasons why he may want to make these expenditures even if the allegations made by Stormy Daniels are untrue. Just for family harmony, commercial viability over the long term.”
Mine are based on public evidence and statements while yours are based on a desire for it to be true.The timing is likely based on her greed but that is just a guess. No more or less accurate than your assumptionsConsidering he kept her "hush" for YEARS before ever running for President I'd say it certainly isn't political.If, historically, the FEC has said this sort of payment isn't a campaign contribution, cite the historic cases....
From everything I understand, it's going to come down to intent. Was the payment for personal or political reasons.
Would you not agree?
The timing of the payments (weeks before the election) and Guliani's statements put that in question.
"Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the, you know, last debate with Hillary Clinton,”
Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.Former FEC Chairman To Mark Levin: Stormy Daniels Money Cannot Be In Kind Campaign Contribution
Former Trump attorney, Michael Cohen to federal judge: "Guilty your honor"
Your post is retarded, Trump didn't break the law legal experts and even a former FEC chairman say so, suck it.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
Mine are based on public evidence and statements while yours are based on a desire for it to be true.The timing is likely based on her greed but that is just a guess. No more or less accurate than your assumptionsConsidering he kept her "hush" for YEARS before ever running for President I'd say it certainly isn't political.If, historically, the FEC has said this sort of payment isn't a campaign contribution, cite the historic cases....
From everything I understand, it's going to come down to intent. Was the payment for personal or political reasons.
Would you not agree?
The timing of the payments (weeks before the election) and Guliani's statements put that in question.
"Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the, you know, last debate with Hillary Clinton,”
I have no desires on the subject dear.
Make no mistake, I don't give a rat's ass either way.
So what did Cohen plead guilty to?Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.Former FEC Chairman To Mark Levin: Stormy Daniels Money Cannot Be In Kind Campaign Contribution
Former Trump attorney, Michael Cohen to federal judge: "Guilty your honor"
Your post is retarded, Trump didn't break the law legal experts and even a former FEC chairman say so, suck it.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
The payment wasn't illegal, man it sucks to be you.
Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.Former FEC Chairman To Mark Levin: Stormy Daniels Money Cannot Be In Kind Campaign Contribution
Former Trump attorney, Michael Cohen to federal judge: "Guilty your honor"
Your post is retarded, Trump didn't break the law legal experts and even a former FEC chairman say so, suck it.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
The payment wasn't illegal, man it sucks to be you.
So what did Cohen plead guilty to?Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.Your post is retarded, Trump didn't break the law legal experts and even a former FEC chairman say so, suck it.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
The payment wasn't illegal, man it sucks to be you.
You certainly can trust faux libertarians though, right?Well if you cannot trust a Repub who wants even less regulation of campaign finances telling a far right conservative talk show host what he wants to hear, who can you trust.
Why would anyone imagine that you could trust a lawyer hand picked by Rosenstein? It takes a real idiot to swallow that proposition.Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.Your post is retarded, Trump didn't break the law legal experts and even a former FEC chairman say so, suck it.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
The payment wasn't illegal, man it sucks to be you.
Which to believe?
Some partisan hack on an Internet forum and a partisan hack that wants less rules and regulations dealing with campaign finance...
Or
The Southern District of New York, the lawyer that worked out the plea deal and the lawyer that signed the plea deal.
Sort of like choosing between getting punched in the gut or eating pizza...not really a hard choice
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
If, historically, the FEC has said this sort of payment isn't a campaign contribution, cite the historic cases....
From everything I understand, it's going to come down to intent. Was the payment for personal or political reasons.
Mine are based on public evidence and statements while yours are based on a desire for it to be true.The timing is likely based on her greed but that is just a guess. No more or less accurate than your assumptionsConsidering he kept her "hush" for YEARS before ever running for President I'd say it certainly isn't political.If, historically, the FEC has said this sort of payment isn't a campaign contribution, cite the historic cases....
From everything I understand, it's going to come down to intent. Was the payment for personal or political reasons.
Would you not agree?
The timing of the payments (weeks before the election) and Guliani's statements put that in question.
"Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the, you know, last debate with Hillary Clinton,”
I have no desires on the subject dear.
Make no mistake, I don't give a rat's ass either way.
Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.Former FEC Chairman To Mark Levin: Stormy Daniels Money Cannot Be In Kind Campaign Contribution
Former Trump attorney, Michael Cohen to federal judge: "Guilty your honor"
Your post is retarded, Trump didn't break the law legal experts and even a former FEC chairman say so, suck it.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
The payment wasn't illegal, man it sucks to be you.
Mine are based on public evidence and statements while yours are based on a desire for it to be true.The timing is likely based on her greed but that is just a guess. No more or less accurate than your assumptionsConsidering he kept her "hush" for YEARS before ever running for President I'd say it certainly isn't political.
Would you not agree?
The timing of the payments (weeks before the election) and Guliani's statements put that in question.
"Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the, you know, last debate with Hillary Clinton,”
I have no desires on the subject dear.
Make no mistake, I don't give a rat's ass either way.
Either way, your theory is based on nothing. All evidence points to the payments being made because of the election not for personal reasons.
Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.Your post is retarded, Trump didn't break the law legal experts and even a former FEC chairman say so, suck it.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
The payment wasn't illegal, man it sucks to be you.
Which to believe?
Some partisan hack on an Internet forum and a partisan hack that wants less rules and regulations dealing with campaign finance...
Or
The Southern District of New York, the lawyer that worked out the plea deal and the lawyer that signed the plea deal.
Sort of like choosing between getting punched in the gut or eating pizza...not really a hard choice
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Which proves exactly nothing.Former FEC Chairman To Mark Levin: Stormy Daniels Money Cannot Be In Kind Campaign Contribution
Former Trump attorney, Michael Cohen to federal judge: "Guilty your honor"
Your expecting the psycho Trump-hating snowflakes to use logic. Watch how ingenious they are at avoiding that.Mine are based on public evidence and statements while yours are based on a desire for it to be true.The timing is likely based on her greed but that is just a guess. No more or less accurate than your assumptionsConsidering he kept her "hush" for YEARS before ever running for President I'd say it certainly isn't political.
Would you not agree?
The timing of the payments (weeks before the election) and Guliani's statements put that in question.
"Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the, you know, last debate with Hillary Clinton,”
I have no desires on the subject dear.
Make no mistake, I don't give a rat's ass either way.
Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.Your post is retarded, Trump didn't break the law legal experts and even a former FEC chairman say so, suck it.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
The payment wasn't illegal, man it sucks to be you.
Mine are based on public evidence and statements while yours are based on a desire for it to be true.The timing is likely based on her greed but that is just a guess. No more or less accurate than your assumptionsThe timing of the payments (weeks before the election) and Guliani's statements put that in question.
"Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the, you know, last debate with Hillary Clinton,”
I have no desires on the subject dear.
Make no mistake, I don't give a rat's ass either way.
Either way, your theory is based on nothing. All evidence points to the payments being made because of the election not for personal reasons.
Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
The payment wasn't illegal, man it sucks to be you.
Which to believe?
Some partisan hack on an Internet forum and a partisan hack that wants less rules and regulations dealing with campaign finance...
Or
The Southern District of New York, the lawyer that worked out the plea deal and the lawyer that signed the plea deal.
Sort of like choosing between getting punched in the gut or eating pizza...not really a hard choice
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
And so-------->If Trump is guilty for an NDA using his own money, then should we assume that everyone in congress who created an NDA (non disclosure agreement) using our taxpayer dollars is also guilty of the same thing-)
In another thread I reminded people, you can NOT pick and choose. It either is, or it isn't! Everyone treated fairly, remember-)
Sooooooooooooo, is it, or isn't it? Gee, I wonder how many congress critters have made NDAs, before their election, and after their election, using the slush fund that we all discovered, lol. Should they be prosecuted, or resign, and if so/if not, why?
Why would anyone imagine that you could trust a lawyer hand picked by Rosenstein? It takes a real idiot to swallow that proposition.Still retardedly suggesting that Cohen, his attorney, the prosecutor and the judge all just made a mistake doesn't change what actually happened.Retarded is suggesting that Cohen plead guilty to a crime that was in fact not a crime.
That is about as retarded as one can be for Trump.
Cohen plead guilty to have a dozen crimes moron, all of which were crimes with the exception of the Stormy payment. Here I'll reply for you, but but but...but BUTTHURT.
Cohen plead guilty to, and named Trump as a co-conspirator in two counts related to the payment, dope.
The payment wasn't illegal, man it sucks to be you.
Which to believe?
Some partisan hack on an Internet forum and a partisan hack that wants less rules and regulations dealing with campaign finance...
Or
The Southern District of New York, the lawyer that worked out the plea deal and the lawyer that signed the plea deal.
Sort of like choosing between getting punched in the gut or eating pizza...not really a hard choice
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Which proves exactly nothing.Former FEC Chairman To Mark Levin: Stormy Daniels Money Cannot Be In Kind Campaign Contribution
Former Trump attorney, Michael Cohen to federal judge: "Guilty your honor"
The snowflakes insist that paying Stormy to shut her pie hole is a campaign contribution. Here's the final word on the subject. Only sheer idiocy would cause anyone to continue claiming that the snowflake theory is valid.
Law Professor and former FEC chairman Bradley Smith spoke with conservative radio host Mark Levin on Tuesday. He laid out the reason why the payment made to porn star Stormy Daniels from President Trump’s private attorney Michael Cohen could not be an in-kind campaign contribution.
“Here’s the bottom line,” Smith told Levin. “The purpose of those laws is to prevent corruption and one way campaign contributions or in-kind campaign contributions are different than bribes is that you have to use them to get elected. You can’t use them to buy yourself grandfather clocks or fur coats or Rolex watches or something like that.”
He said, “And the FEC standard for that is you can’t use your campaign money for personal use. What they mean by that is you can’t use that for something you’d have to pay anyway that’s not directly for your campaign. The question is, ‘is this really a campaign obligation?’”
Professor Smith continued, “None of these expenditures helped Mr. Trump’s campaign. There’s all kinds of reasons why he may want to make these expenditures even if the allegations made by Stormy Daniels are untrue. Just for family harmony, commercial viability over the long term.”
He emphasized, “Historically, the FEC has said these things are not campaign contributions.”
Professor Smith added, “When the FEC wrote the regulation that says what constitutes campaign expenditures and what constitutes personal use, it rejected specifically the idea that a campaign expenditure was anything related to a campaign, and instead says it has to be something that exists only because of the campaign and solely for that reason.”
And so-------->If Trump is guilty for an NDA using his own money, then should we assume that everyone in congress who created an NDA (non disclosure agreement) using our taxpayer dollars is also guilty of the same thing-)
In another thread I reminded people, you can NOT pick and choose. It either is, or it isn't! Everyone treated fairly, remember-)
Sooooooooooooo, is it, or isn't it? Gee, I wonder how many congress critters have made NDAs, before their election, and after their election, using the slush fund that we all discovered, lol. Should they be prosecuted, or resign, and if so/if not, why?
