teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
Here are the indisputable facts of the case:
1. The Ohio legislation took away early voting rights for all non-military Ohioans
2. The Obama for America, etc. group sued to get those rights back for those non-military Ohioans.
3. The group asked for an injunction to prevent enforcement of that portion of the law that took the above rights away; in other words, were their requested injunction imposed, all Ohioans would get that early voting right.
4. The military groups asked to intervene ONLY because of the basis of the argument made in the above injunction, i.e., that it was unconstitutional to give one group special privilege here, that group being the military. Their argument is that they are entitled to special privileges and a ruling in favor of the injunction would effectively say they weren't.
Here's the facts.
Ohio got rid of early voting because Democrats were early voting and filing for absentee ballots at the same time. See my post where I give MULTIPLE LINKS TO BACK ME UP!
Military voters cannot commit the same kind of fraud.
The Ohio legislature and the Gov changed the laws AT THE BEHEST OF THE OHIO VOTER WHO DO NOT LIKE DEMOCRAT VOTE FRAUD IN THEIR STATE.
Same reason they passed Voter ID.
Obama is suing to either force the state return to the same kind of fraud we saw in 2008 or suppress the military vote.
THOSE ARE THE FACTS!