Fox News Reports on Collapse of Building 7 Before It Happens

OF COURSE NOT BONE HEAD ITS HIS NASA SITE..it is there to confirm his bio..he made his statement and is the proposed head of an independent investigation as stated in the petition..end of story
 
OF COURSE NOT BONE HEAD ITS HIS NASA SITE..it is there to confirm his bio..he made his statement and is the proposed head of an independent investigation as stated in the petition..end of story
yeah, i'm the bonehead
at least i'm not the one denying the truth
 
prove that popular mechanics experts say what they said....prove Obama is not a hologram...prove that any link the entire internet is real...prove you are not a ..butterfly.....
.....dreaming all of this...
 
prove that popular mechanics experts say what they said....prove Obama is not a hologram...prove that any link the entire internet is real...prove you are not a ..butterfly.....
.....dreaming all of this...
wow
you are really way out there
LOL
 
Support the new investigation | Justice for 9/11 Heroes and Victims
... thinking of "the victims of 9/11," too many of us focus ... Navy Captain Dr. Edgar Mitchell is a scientist, test pilot, astronaut

Support the new investigation | Justice for 9/11 Heroes and Victims



Eye on the Future Radio : : Past Shows and Guests ( with host ...
Eye on the Future Radio, with Hehpsehboah is broadcast and webcast on the Eye on the Future Radio Network -, Be in ... 911 - What Really Happened? ... EDGAR MITCHELL. Thursday 5 August. 4 PM to 6 ...
www.eyeonthefutureradio.com/past_shows_2004.htm
 
Support the new investigation | Justice for 9/11 Heroes and Victims
... thinking of "the victims of 9/11," too many of us focus ... Navy Captain Dr. Edgar Mitchell is a scientist, test pilot, astronaut

Support the new investigation | Justice for 9/11 Heroes and Victims



Eye on the Future Radio : : Past Shows and Guests ( with host ...
Eye on the Future Radio, with Hehpsehboah is broadcast and webcast on the Eye on the Future Radio Network -, Be in ... 911 - What Really Happened? ... EDGAR MITCHELL. Thursday 5 August. 4 PM to 6 ...
www.eyeonthefutureradio.com/past_shows_2004.htm
your first link is to yet another troofer moron site, so worthless
the second link is broken
 
The BBC also reported it pre-maturely.

They all knew it was going to come down Eventually. It was a known fact that all fire fighting efforts had been stopped and the Building was likely to collapse. In light of those facts, and the over all mood of that day. It is not a stretch to imagine that one or even a few News groups might have screwed up and prematurely reported it's collapse as most we monitoring it waiting for it to do so.

I don't get you nuts. This is something, but when Dan Rather calls the race for Gore prematurely thats nothing :)
 
They all knew it was going to come down Eventually. It was a known fact that all fire fighting efforts had been stopped and the Building was likely to collapse. In light of those facts, and the over all mood of that day. It is not a stretch to imagine that one or even a few News groups might have screwed up and prematurely reported it's collapse as most we monitoring it waiting for it to do so.

I don't get you nuts. This is something, but when Dan Rather calls the race for Gore prematurely thats nothing :)
and what about the superdome being a killing field during katrina
the media screws things up more than they get right
 
so what?

so what if Cheney was flying the pentagon flight remote control, or scuba diving those levee's pre-Katrina

so what if the pentagon thought up the gulf of token....

so what if the warren commision whitewashed the Kennedy assasination

so what if MK Ultra, Rex84, or any 'operation kill innocent Americans' exists

wtf can anyone do about it?

zip, zero, nada....
 
unless of course if is popular mechanics...and it supports your conspiracy theory
yeah, there is no difference between getting an early report wrong and a review of the facts months after


see, its this difference that makes you a fucking MORON
 
They all knew it was going to come down Eventually. It was a known fact that all fire fighting efforts had been stopped and the Building was likely to collapse. In light of those facts, and the over all mood of that day. It is not a stretch to imagine that one or even a few News groups might have screwed up and prematurely reported it's collapse as most we monitoring it waiting for it to do so.

I don't get you nuts. This is something, but when Dan Rather calls the race for Gore prematurely thats nothing :)

why no building ever collapsed due to fire..and how could this possibly result in a free fall collapses into its own footprint in a controlled manner..ludicrous

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng]YouTube - WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)[/ame]
 
why no building ever collapsed due to fire..and how could this possibly result in a free fall collapses into its own footprint in a controlled manner..ludicrous

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)

YouTube - WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)

As I have shown, all these physics experts and professors of engineering at the best engineering schools in the world disagree with you. Don't you think you could be wrong about this?
• Dr. Zdeněk P. Bažant- Engineering Professor at Northwestern
www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant.html
• Dr. Asif Usmani: Professor of engineering at Edinburgh Fire Safety Engineering
Dr. Jose Torero: Professor of engineering at Edinburgh Fire Safety Engineering
"This paper uses a finite element model to investigate the stability of the Twin-Towers of the World Trade Center, New York for a number of different fire scenarios."
http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/1216
• Dr. Tim Wilkinson: Professor of engineering at The university of Sydney Tim Wilkinson - Civil Engineering - The University of Sydney
o http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.shtml
• Dr. Hassan Astaneh: Professor of engineering at Berkley

• Dr. W. Gene Corley: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Gene_Corley
• Dr. Robert L. Parker: Physics professor at USC mahi.ucsd.edu/parker/
• Dr. Mete Sozen: Engineering professor at Purdue https://engineering.purdue.edu/CE/Pe...source_id=2260
• Dr. Fred Culick: Engineering professor at Cal tech. http://www.galcit.caltech.edu/people/faculty/culick.html
• Dr. Ching S. Chang: http://www.ecs.umass.edu/index.pl?id=3906
• Dr. Ayhan Irfanoglu- Engineering professor at Purdue http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~ayhan/
• Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer -Engineering Professor at the university of Maryland http://www.fpe.umd.edu/faculty-profiles/mowrer.html
• Dr Keith Seffen Engineering Professor at Cambridge University http://www-civ.eng.cam.ac.uk/struct/kas/
• Masayuki Nakao Engineering professor at the University of Tokyo. http://www.adm.u-tokyo.ac.jp/IRS/IntroPage_E/intro70145484_e.html
 
Last edited:
you did it again a bunch of links that have no statements or don't work or wikipedia
or the fema reports..post the person thier credentials and their statements in regards to wtc or give it up
 
you did it again a bunch of links that have no statements or don't work or wikipedia
or the fema reports..post the person thier credentials and their statements in regards to wtc or give it up

Like I said, I have posted what thier views were on 9/11 in the past. I also have MANY more but didnt feel like adding any more at the time I made the list.
It seems awfully hypocritical of you to criticize my experts since a number of the people you have used we can't anywhere on the web or are not even against the official story of 9/11. For example, you have used experts who say that they want a new 9/11 investigation. Meanwhile, they might not be saying they believe there is an inside, but you add them in anyhow.

Anyways, I attached my experts statements/papers to their names again:

• Dr. Zdeněk P. Bažant- Engineering Professor at Northwestern
- His view on 9/11: http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/405.pdf
- His credentials: Biography of Zdeněk P. Bažant — PNAS
Civil and Environmental Engineering - Faculty Profile - Zdenek Bazant
• Dr. Paul F. Mlakar Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE
- His View on 9/11: http://mceer.buffalo.edu/meetings/AEI/presentations/06Mlakar-paper.pdf
- His credentials: http://mceer.buffalo.edu/meetings/AEI/Mlakar.pdf
• Dr. Tim Wilkinson: Professor of engineering at The university of Sydney
- His view on 9/11: World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects - Civil Engineering - The University of Sydney
- His credentials: Tim Wilkinson - Civil Engineering - The University of Sydney
• Dr. Hassan Astaneh: Professor of engineering at Berkley
- His view on 9/11: Jets hit towers in most vulnerable spots / Killers appear to have known where to strike
- His Credentials: Engineering News, Date
(located under his photo)
• Dr. W. Gene Corley:
- His view on 9/11: Gene Corley | World news | The Guardian
- His Credentials: W. Gene Corley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://www.ctlgroup.com/files/dynamic_resumes/Corley NARRES 0131.pdf
• Dr. Robert L. Parker: Physics professor at USC
- His view on 9/11: Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics
- His credentials: mahi.ucsd.edu/parker/
• Dr. Mete Sozen: Engineering professor at Purdue
- His View on 9/11: New simulation shows 9/11 plane crash with scientific detail
- His credentials :https://engineering.purdue.edu/CE/Pe...source_id=2260
• Dr. Fred Culick: Engineering professor at Cal tech. His view on 9/11: Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics His Credentials :GALCIT :: Fred Culick
• Dr. Ching S. Chang:
- His view on 9/11: Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - The Paper
- His credentials: http://www.ecs.umass.edu/index.pl?id=3906
• Dr. Ayhan Irfanoglu- Engineering professor at Purdue
- His view on 9/11: https://www.washingtontimes.com/themes/people/ayhan-irfanoglu/
-His credentials: Ayhan Irfanoglu - Purdue University
• Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer -Engineering Professor at the university of Maryland
- His view on 9/11: Collapse of the World Trade Center -Debunk 9/11 Myths
- His Crednetials : Frederick W. Mowrer, Faculty, Department of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland
• Dr Keith Seffen Engineering Professor at Cambridge University
- His view on 9/11: BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | 9/11 demolition theory challenged
- His Credentials: Keith Seffen
• Dr. Asif Usmani: Professor of engineering at Edinburgh
- His view on 9/11: http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/1216
- His Credentials: Fire Safety Engineering
• Dr. Jose Torero: Professor of engineering at Edinburgh
- His View on 9/11: http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/1216
- His credentials: Fire Safety Engineering
• Arvid Naess: Professor of engineering at Norwegian University of Science and Technology
- His View on 9/11: Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - The Paper
- His Credentials: http://www.bygg.ntnu.no/~arvidn/front.htm
• Masayuki Nakao Engineering professor at the University of Tokyo.
- His view on 9/11: JST Failure Knowledge Database > Case Details > The World Trade Center Collapse
- His credentials: Masayuki Nakao
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top