DaGoose
Gold Member
- Nov 16, 2010
- 4,347
- 666
Why? If the action was, indeed, illegal under international law, why should anyone be fired for saying so?
Surely, you are not so afraid of international law that you want to silence those who raise the legality of it?
Isn't the left the ones who kept shrieking about the illegality of the Iraq war etc etc etc? So, international law was fine and dandy then.... but now that it's your guy, it's suddenly not ok?
Fucking hypocrites.
Once again I do not give one good rats ass how, who or why Osama Bin Lade4n was killed. I don't care about any claims of illegality. He declared war on us. he got killed in his war.
There is no such thing as International law. There are treaties between Countries and even those can be ignored if a Country so wishes. The only "foreign" law enforceable on a Sovereign nation is that law that is agreed to by said Country or enforced after losing a war.
There certainly is such a thing as international law. They govern the interaction between countries. And, what we (and I say we because Obama, as President, acts on behalf of We, the People) did was, possibly, illegal under international law. Do I care that we may have broken international law? Nope. But commentators are perfectly entitled to call it illegal, just like they did when the US invaded Iraq.
Napalitano is an ass. But I see no reason why he should be fired for this.
I agree with this. Where the hell was "International Law" when those planes were flown into the WTC? If we violated "Internation Law" by killing OBL then so be it.
.