FUNNY but TRUE!

only simpleton assholes and dumbos are ranting about their guns this week.


bless your hearts...
 
The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.

Dumb ass

Oh wow. You mean they had the right to bear these?

arms-vector-9.jpg


Jesus, I'm so stunned by your towering intellect.
 
we have 12,000 gun laws.

and that moron thinks we need new ones

why?

so he 'feels' better.

Have you ever read a state gun statute? Try it sometime. Every single law is full of "with the exception of" the statute that preceded, with the sole intention of diluting and neutering the law, courtesy of your Republican congressional whores.
 
we have 12,000 gun laws.

and that moron thinks we need new ones

why?

so he 'feels' better.

Have you ever read a state gun statute? Try it sometime. Every single law is full of "with the exception of" the statute that preceded, with the sole intention of diluting and neutering the law, courtesy of your Republican congressional whores.
you poor dood

It scares you that Americans have Constitutional rights and are allowed to freely express their support.
 
The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.

Dumb ass

Oh wow. You mean they had the right to bear these?

arms-vector-9.jpg


Jesus, I'm so stunned by your towering intellect.


No surprise there, you're stunned at shiny objects.

It's obvious none of you have the first clue what the Second is all about but it's delicious watching you out stupid each other trying to explain it
 
ask the bundy ranch dumbos how taking up arms against the US government worked out for them...


:laugh2:
 
The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.

Dumb ass

Oh wow. You mean they had the right to bear these?

arms-vector-9.jpg


Jesus, I'm so stunned by your towering intellect.


No surprise there, you're stunned at shiny objects.

It's obvious none of you have the first clue what the Second is all about but it's delicious watching you out stupid each other trying to explain it

the second has ZERO dumbass to do with taking up arms against the government.

hacks like you should probably read the part of the constitution where they make treason illegal.

dumbass.
 
Many guns and arms were so deadly when the 2nd amendment was written, they are illegal to manufacture or own today. The OP is a lie.
 
The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.

Dumb ass

Oh wow. You mean they had the right to bear these?

arms-vector-9.jpg


Jesus, I'm so stunned by your towering intellect.


No surprise there, you're stunned at shiny objects.

It's obvious none of you have the first clue what the Second is all about but it's delicious watching you out stupid each other trying to explain it

the second has ZERO dumbass to do with taking up arms against the government.

hacks like you should probably read the part of the constitution where they make treason illegal.

dumbass.

Don't you have a pretend brief to prepare for a pretend court case tomorrow?

You're clueless as to the Second....but most left loons are. This thread is absolute proof of it
 
lol @ the "law & order" rethuglican president who has actively undermined the integrity of our chief law enforcement agency since day one...
 
I LMAO at this, because it's freakin' TRUE.


/-----/ Time to teach the gun grabbers some history:
Enter the Girandoni air rifle. The Girandoni air rifle is a repeating rifle capable of firing 22 shots in under a minute without a reload — and Meriwether Lewis’s air gun was one such firearm. Lewis’s rifle was a .46 caliber, magazine-fed repeating gun capable of shooting 22 shots in under a minute. IN 1803
These Guns Dispel The Notion The Founding Fathers Could Never Have Imagined Modern Assault Rifles


Lewis and Clark may have had them with them, but did you know that they were discontinued after only a few years because of all the problems associated with them? And Lewis and Clark only used them for demonstrations.

Girandoni air rifle - Wikipedia

The Girandoni air rifle was in service with the Austrian army from 1780 to around 1815. The advantages of a high rate of fire, no smoke from propellants, and low muzzle report granted it acceptance. It did have problems and was eventually removed from service for several reasons decades after introduction. While the detachable air reservoir was capable of around 30 shots it took nearly 1,500 strokes of a hand pump to fill those reservoirs. Later, a wagon-mounted pump was provided. The reservoirs, made from hammered sheet iron held together with rivets and sealed by brazing, proved very difficult to manufacture using the techniques of the period and were always in short supply.


In addition, the weapon was very delicate and a small break in the reservoir could make it inoperable. Finally, it was very different from any other weapon of the time and any soldier using it needed to be highly trained.


The Lewis and Clark Expedition used the rifle in the demonstrations that they performed for nearly every Native American tribe they encountered on the expedition.[1][2]

Holy shit. It's almost like technology just kept moving forward. No wonder we aren't driving Model T's anymore.


so you think individuals should have nuclear weapons?


Stupid people ALWAYS take everything to a stupid conclusion.
 
We do already ban weapons of war such as full auto, tanks, etc. The question is, why is an AR-15 more deadly than a shotgun (for instance) and why should they be banned? It is not a weapon of war.
 
We do already ban weapons of war such as full auto, tanks, etc. The question is, why is an AR-15 more deadly than a shotgun (for instance) and why should they be banned? It is not a weapon of war.

An AR 15 is deadlier than a shotgun because it has a longer effective range, as well as it can fire more ammo downrange than a shotgun before it has to be reloaded.

Originally, the AR 15 came with only a 5 round magazine. Now? You can get them in 30 to 100 round magazines and drums.
 
We do already ban weapons of war such as full auto, tanks, etc. The question is, why is an AR-15 more deadly than a shotgun (for instance) and why should they be banned? It is not a weapon of war.

Dead is dead no matter what weapon one uses. We could ban larger magazines but anyone who wants them could still get them. Gun laws only make people who are afraid "feel" better. They don't accomplish anything.
 

Forum List

Back
Top