Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.
Dumb ass
The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.
Dumb ass
good catch
said no one
Oh look it's the newest board troll again,
we have 12,000 gun laws.
and that moron thinks we need new ones
why?
so he 'feels' better.
you poor doodwe have 12,000 gun laws.
and that moron thinks we need new ones
why?
so he 'feels' better.
Have you ever read a state gun statute? Try it sometime. Every single law is full of "with the exception of" the statute that preceded, with the sole intention of diluting and neutering the law, courtesy of your Republican congressional whores.
so you think individuals should have nuclear weapons?
The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.
Dumb ass
Oh wow. You mean they had the right to bear these?
Jesus, I'm so stunned by your towering intellect.
The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.
Dumb ass
Oh wow. You mean they had the right to bear these?
Jesus, I'm so stunned by your towering intellect.
No surprise there, you're stunned at shiny objects.
It's obvious none of you have the first clue what the Second is all about but it's delicious watching you out stupid each other trying to explain it
The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.
Dumb ass
Oh wow. You mean they had the right to bear these?
Jesus, I'm so stunned by your towering intellect.
No surprise there, you're stunned at shiny objects.
It's obvious none of you have the first clue what the Second is all about but it's delicious watching you out stupid each other trying to explain it
the second has ZERO dumbass to do with taking up arms against the government.
hacks like you should probably read the part of the constitution where they make treason illegal.
dumbass.
I LMAO at this, because it's freakin' TRUE.
/-----/ Time to teach the gun grabbers some history:
Enter the Girandoni air rifle. The Girandoni air rifle is a repeating rifle capable of firing 22 shots in under a minute without a reload — and Meriwether Lewis’s air gun was one such firearm. Lewis’s rifle was a .46 caliber, magazine-fed repeating gun capable of shooting 22 shots in under a minute. IN 1803
These Guns Dispel The Notion The Founding Fathers Could Never Have Imagined Modern Assault Rifles
Lewis and Clark may have had them with them, but did you know that they were discontinued after only a few years because of all the problems associated with them? And Lewis and Clark only used them for demonstrations.
Girandoni air rifle - Wikipedia
The Girandoni air rifle was in service with the Austrian army from 1780 to around 1815. The advantages of a high rate of fire, no smoke from propellants, and low muzzle report granted it acceptance. It did have problems and was eventually removed from service for several reasons decades after introduction. While the detachable air reservoir was capable of around 30 shots it took nearly 1,500 strokes of a hand pump to fill those reservoirs. Later, a wagon-mounted pump was provided. The reservoirs, made from hammered sheet iron held together with rivets and sealed by brazing, proved very difficult to manufacture using the techniques of the period and were always in short supply.
In addition, the weapon was very delicate and a small break in the reservoir could make it inoperable. Finally, it was very different from any other weapon of the time and any soldier using it needed to be highly trained.
The Lewis and Clark Expedition used the rifle in the demonstrations that they performed for nearly every Native American tribe they encountered on the expedition.[1][2]
Holy shit. It's almost like technology just kept moving forward. No wonder we aren't driving Model T's anymore.
so you think individuals should have nuclear weapons?
Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.
................
look who imagines they speak for the whole forum.
jill is an attorney...
and you're not even a sassy irish lass.
We do already ban weapons of war such as full auto, tanks, etc. The question is, why is an AR-15 more deadly than a shotgun (for instance) and why should they be banned? It is not a weapon of war.
We do already ban weapons of war such as full auto, tanks, etc. The question is, why is an AR-15 more deadly than a shotgun (for instance) and why should they be banned? It is not a weapon of war.