DBA
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2015
- 12,661
- 11,503
- 2,140
you are out of your mind....
What is your theory? COVID is natural? You can’t possibly be that naive can you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
you are out of your mind....
You don't have a mind.you are out of your mind....
surada you disagreed with this. Seriously, you don’t believe the strain of COVID that made its way around the world in 2020 was derived in a lab? Not sure what ”science” you follow.What is your theory? COVID is natural? You can’t possibly be that naive can you?
surada you disagreed with this. Seriously, you don’t believe the strain of COVID that made its way around the world in 2020 was derived in a lab? Not sure what ”science” you follow.
Another day, another conspiracy theory...
Fucking idiot are sitting over 1 million deaths with a large section coming from ignorance and spreading of misinformation and they still want to keep doing it..
How many people would have to die before these RW fucks will stop lying or being so fucking gullible..
Maybe, but it wasn't a conspiracy and it wasn't deliberate.
It was modified to infect humans, which was the gain of function. That is undeniable. Yeah, maybe it was just a huge coincidence that Fauci’s NIH had funded this research and it just happened to accidentally escape from the lab after all other attempts to remove Trump from office had failed and with an economy that was flying high, was destined to be re-elected. I mean, we know that Democrats(one-world governance) would never stoop so low as to release a virus that would kill millions worldwide just to regain/retain power and to remove Trump, right? TDS and establishment types couldn’t possibly that evil.
fact-checked ... when it comes to Fox noise and Tucker Carlson truth is something they don't know anything about ... The claim that Fauci is "responsible" for the COVID-19 pandemic is based, in turn, on speculation that NIH-funded gain of function research resulted in a manipulated form of the coronavirus "spilling over" from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and infecting the human population. In October 2021, the congressional group U.S. House Oversight Committee revealed that a grantee of NIH funding failed to report the outcomes of an experiment involving coronaviruses infection in mouse models, prompting a secondary review by the federal agency. The NIH demanded researchers submit further documentation by the end of October. Until that information is made publicly available, we rate this claim as “Unproven”When will the Fauci apoligists finally realize what a hack he is?
I'm guessing never.
Fox News Special Report outlines fresh questions on what Fauci, government knew about COVID origin
Special Report obtained documents showing what was happening behind the scenes in the early days of the pandemic
Fresh questions are being raised about what American scientists and federal health officials knew about the origins of the coronavirus and whether conflicting evidence was suppressed and hidden from the public.
On Tuesday night’s episode of Special Report with Bret Baier, Fox News dove into the early days of the coronavirus pandemic and explored documents obtained showing that Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was warned early on that the virus may have originated in a Wuhan, China lab.
According to the timeline of events laid out by Baier, Fauci was told on January 27, 2020 that his NIAID had been indirectly funding the Wuhan lab through EcoHealth-- a US-based scientific non-profit that had been working with novel coronaviruses.
On January 31, Dr. Kristian Andersen, a noted virologist at the Scripps Lab, privately told Fauci that after discussion with his colleagues some of COVID-19’s features look possibly engineered and the "genome is inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory."
Andersen added that the situation needed to be looked at more closely, at which point Fauci organized an all hands on deck conference call with colleagues where he was told that risky experiments with the novel coronavirus may not have gone through proper biosafety review and oversight.
Hours later, Fauci hastily organized a call with dozens of worldwide virologists, and notes from the meeting obtained by Special Report reveal that suspicions of the lab leak theory were suppressed over concerns of how the public would react to news of possible Chinese government involvement.
In the meeting, fears were raised by then-National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins that "science and international harmony" could be harmed and accusations of China’s involvement could distract top researchers.
RAND PAUL CONTINUES PRESSING FAUCI FOR ANSWERS ON NIH GAIN-OF-FUNCTION FUNDING
Another scientist in the meeting dismissed the possibility that the virus jumped from a bat to a person in nature and pointed out that the virus could be generated in a lab much easier.
Fauci and others in the meeting pointed to evidence that the virus originated in a seafood and wild animal market in Wuhan, which was complicated by the market being shut down and scrubbed clean by Chinese authorities.
A consensus was reached in the call that the lab origin should not be mentioned in a paper because it will add "fuel to the conspiracists," and Collins appeared convinced that natural origin of the virus was "more likely."
Fox News Special Report outlines fresh questions on what Fauci, government knew about COVID origin
Fresh questions are being raised about what American scientists and federal health officials knew about the origins of the coronavirus and whether or not conflicting evidence was suppressed and hidden from the public.www.foxnews.com
The 2014 funding pause pertained to a subset of gain-of-function research that could reasonably be anticipated to confer attributes to influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses such that the virus would have enhanced pathogenicity or transmissibility in mammals via the respiratory route. Following the initiation of the pause, this grant was reviewed again and determined by experts to fall outside the scope of the funding pause.Based on outbreaks of coronaviruses caused by animal to human transmissions such as in Asia in 2003 that caused Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and in Saudi Arabia in 2012 that caused Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), NIH and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) have for many years supported grants to learn more about viruses lurking in bats and other mammals that have the potential to spill over to humans and cause widespread disease. However, neither NIH nor NIAID have ever approved any grant that would have supported “gain-of-function” research on coronaviruses that would have increased their transmissibility or lethality for humans. NIH strongly supports the need for further investigation by the World Health Organization (WHO) into the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.
Coronaviruses, especially those found in bats, have been studied around the world due to their prevalence in the natural world and ability to infect across species. In fact, there are hundreds of coronaviruses, most of which circulate among animals and some of which can jump to humans in what is called a spillover event. Following the SARS and MERS outbreaks of 2002 and 2012 respectively, the NIAID identified coronaviruses as a priority for researchers to investigate, including how these viruses originate and cause disease, as well as to develop animal study models for new treatments and potential vaccines.The limited experiment described in the final progress report provided by EcoHealth Alliance was testing if spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model. All other aspects of the mice, including the immune system, remained unchanged. In this limited experiment, laboratory mice were infected with the SHC014 WIV1 bat coronavirus. As sometimes occurs in science, this was an unexpected result of the research as opposed to something that the researchers set out to do. Regardless, the viruses being studied under this grant were genetically very distant from SARS-CoV-2.
You've lost your mind. Protect yourself from these crackpot conspiracy theories.
Yes yes COVID must be a conspiracy, right, brainwashed conspiracy nut job? LOLWhat is your theory? COVID is natural? You can’t possibly be that naive can you?
So you have been doing your own research, taking only from conservative propaganda sites of course zzzzzzzzzzWhat are you talking about? The lab was focused on gain of function research. This virus would not have infected humans without that research. That is not a conspiracy theory. That is a fact. Have your sources not told you this?
trollYou don't have a mind.
The actual US scientists. Who, in short, just need an actual spokesperson lol... These things happen when you have a godawful once a century pandemic, but the real problem of course was the GOP propaganda machine garbling and arguing every ridiculous exception to the rules and any possible misunderstandings. And the orange clown and his minions of course....surada you disagreed with this. Seriously, you don’t believe the strain of COVID that made its way around the world in 2020 was derived in a lab? Not sure what ”science” you follow.
How erudite!troll
Do tell us what your sources are saying. Are they attempting to say that the lab was not focused on gain of function research?So you have been doing your own research, taking only from conservative propaganda sites of course zzzzzzzzzz
Every respected media and every respected expert around the world says you people just make up crap. DUH. None of your GOP conspiracies have any basis in fact. Including the election fraud and all your all the rest.... Poor America. You have to really be ignorant to believe all that crap lolDo tell us what your sources are saying. Are they attempting to say that the lab was not focused on gain of function research?
If there was any actual evidence scientists would have done something along with everyone else. Red China is totally secrecy but they're not suicidal.Do tell us what your sources are saying. Are they attempting to say that the lab was not focused on gain of function research?