Gary Johnson believes Clinton did not commit a crime re:emails

[A Perez]

In a blow for non-libertarian right-wingers, libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just said that Hillary Clinton did not have "criminal intent" regarding these emails. "I'm not a stone thrower", he said, adding, "I don't see an indictment".

Johnson is saner than Trump.

CNN Politics on Twitter

 

[Mac1958]

Good for him. Calm and reason are in short supply right now.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

In a blow for non-libertarian right-wingers, libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just said that Hillary Clinton did not have "criminal intent" regarding these emails. "I'm not a stone thrower", he said, adding, "I don't see an indictment".

Johnson is saner than Trump.

CNN Politics on Twitter

Criminal intent is not necessary to a violation of law.

 

[BluesLegend]

In a blow for non-libertarian right-wingers, libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just said that Hillary Clinton did not have "criminal intent" regarding these emails. "I'm not a stone thrower", he said, adding, "I don't see an indictment".

Johnson is saner than Trump.

CNN Politics on Twitter

Criminal intent is not necessary to a violation of law.

Bingo! You destroyed this thread.

 

[Wyatt earp]

In a blow for non-libertarian right-wingers, libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just said that Hillary Clinton did not have "criminal intent" regarding these emails. "I'm not a stone thrower", he said, adding, "I don't see an indictment".

Johnson is saner than Trump.

CNN Politics on Twitter

What did Don Johnson or Howard Johnson have to say about it?

That's the only Johnson's liberals know who they are.

lol

 

[BluesLegend]

Gary Johnson is a putz.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Gary Johnson is correct.

There is no crime.

 

[Freewill]

Well, if I were to change my vote, by Mrs. Clinton dropping out, my vote won't be wasted on Johnson.

 

[JakeStarkey]

First Benghazi, now this.

 

[Freewill]

The FBI is in the business of investigating non-crime.

 

[Freewill]

First Benghazi, now this.

The FBI didn't investigate Benghazi as a crime.

 

[JakeStarkey]

There you go. Benghazi and email scandal: tsk.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Gary Johnson is correct.

There is no crime.

No crime? They had to change the law because of that witch.

Like I always said Al Capone would be proud of Hillary


.

 

[Katzndogz]

Gary Johnson figured this out while he was in a pot haze.

 

[A Perez]

In a blow for non-libertarian right-wingers, libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just said that Hillary Clinton did not have "criminal intent" regarding these emails. "I'm not a stone thrower", he said, adding, "I don't see an indictment".

Johnson is saner than Trump.

CNN Politics on Twitter

Criminal intent is not necessary to a violation of law.

CNN said she won't be charged according to law enforcement sources. Go cry somewhere, if you're not already doing so.

In a blow for non-libertarian right-wingers, libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just said that Hillary Clinton did not have "criminal intent" regarding these emails. "I'm not a stone thrower", he said, adding, "I don't see an indictment".

Johnson is saner than Trump.

CNN Politics on Twitter

Criminal intent is not necessary to a violation of law.

Whatever was necessary wasn't there, since sources told CNN Hillary won't be charged, as you read earlier.

 

[A Perez]

Gary Johnson is correct.

There is no crime.

No crime? They had to change the law because of that witch.

Like I always said Al Capone would be proud of Hillary


.

No law was changed because of Hillary. Be less stupid.

 

[JoeB131]

Criminal intent is not necessary to a violation of law.

No. that's why we have judges and juries and cops with the ability to show discretion.

You see, the thing is, you splenetic Clinton haters don't care if she broke the law or not. You WANT her to be guilty of something, even if it was a lot less than things your side did - you know like Ronnie Raygun giving weapons to the Iranians and the proceeds to the Contras, or Karl Rove and Scooter Libby outing Valerie Plame.

If you think those guys all should have gotten passes, then you shouldn't have a problem with Hillary getting a pass.

There's a place to beat Hillary. It's called the ballot box. You probably could have beaten her there if you all nominated a sensible person like Kasich or Rubio. Instead you nominated a Nazi.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Gary Johnson is correct.

There is no crime.

No crime? They had to change the law because of that witch.

Like I always said Al Capone would be proud of Hillary


.

No law was changed because of Hillary. Be less stupid.

Bwahahaha...

Moron

 

[Wyatt earp]

In a blow for non-libertarian right-wingers, libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just said that Hillary Clinton did not have "criminal intent" regarding these emails. "I'm not a stone thrower", he said, adding, "I don't see an indictment".

Johnson is saner than Trump.

CNN Politics on Twitter

Criminal intent is not necessary to a violation of law.

CNN said she won't be charged according to law enforcement sources. Go cry somewhere, if you're not already doing so.

In a blow for non-libertarian right-wingers, libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just said that Hillary Clinton did not have "criminal intent" regarding these emails. "I'm not a stone thrower", he said, adding, "I don't see an indictment".

Johnson is saner than Trump.

CNN Politics on Twitter

Criminal intent is not necessary to a violation of law.

Whatever was necessary wasn't there, since sources told CNN Hillary won't be charged, as you read earlier.

 

[Katzndogz]

The only problem with nominating Kasich is that no one outside of Ohio would vote for him.