Hellbilly
Platinum Member
I ain’t your bro, shitass.Cool story bro.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I ain’t your bro, shitass.Cool story bro.
There is no god, shitass.Thank God 2.0.![]()
Nice come back from the cheap seats.There is no god, shitass.
Well, it’s kind that of a problem.What about him?
Look who's moving goal posts. Why are you afraid to answer my question first bitch? Does being gay make your reproductivesystem inoperable?Ok, we'll take this slow. Can a gay couple have a child of their own?
Do gay people lose their reproductive systems?
Triggered much?This guy cracks me the fuck up! NOBODY HAS SAID THEY DO.
Entertaining chap to say the least.![]()
Not by a dufus like you!Triggered much?![]()
It's hard to hide when you capitalize it like that for us all to see.Not by a dufus like you!
HeyNorm said:NOBODY HAS SAID THEY DO.
I'd say that state bans on marriage has a lot more to do with equal protection than locker rooms.Well, it’s kind that of a problem.
If same sex marriage was made legal using similarly situated as its basis, because, as it has been presented here, that a gay couple can’t procreate as many traditional couples can’t. Then how can straight CIS males be prohibited from womens locker rooms when biological males that identify as female are allowed in.
I would think, since a dude in a dress can go into the woman’s locker room and ogle my wife or daughter, I should have the same right to ogle your wife or daughter
I am far more similarly situated to the cross dressing male than a same sex couple is to a traditional couple.
Interesting to say the least.
This had been answered several times in the thread, and yet you persisted. Of course I put in all caps. You obviously don’t read to well.It's hard to hide when you capitalize it like that for us all to see.![]()
Yes. Multiple people told you how stupid you argument was. I saw that and laughed.This had been answered several times in the thread, and yet you persisted. Of course I put in all caps. You obviously don’t read to well.
![]()
No distraction at all. Let’s simplify it for you.I'd say that state bans on marriage has a lot more to do with equal protection than locker rooms.
The simple solution is that we don't have locker rooms but use private changing rooms. That way no one ever has to be undressed in front of anyone else. Of course, no one ever does have to get dressed in front of anyone else, seeing as how locker rooms aren't nearly as integral to life as marriage.
Not that interesting. In fact, a pretty weird distraction.
Of course you did. Isn’t it nap time for ya lil fella?Yes. Multiple people told you how stupid you argument was. I saw that and laughed.![]()
Yes, everyone.No distraction at all. Let’s simplify it for you.
Does the guarantee of equal protection under the law to people that are similarly situated exist for everyone,, or just gays?
Is a Cis male similarly situated to a pre op male tranny?Yes, everyone.
What does the law have to do with locker rooms?
You're talking to grandfather Short Bus, maybe pretend to be an adult after you pass a highschool biology class.Of course you did. Isn’t it nap time for ya lil fella?
Depends. You can only say they're similar situated depending on the context.Is a Cis male similarly situated to a pre op male tranny?
This really ain’t that hard
You're talking to grandfather Short Bus, maybe pretend to be an adult after you pass a highschool biology class.![]()