taichiliberal
Rookie
- Aug 11, 2010
- 3,517
- 239
- 0
- Banned
- #3,861
I'll warn you, arguing with me about Civil War history is a losing venture for you. Know that upfront.About 30% of Southern families owned slaves.
Wrong.
In today's $$$ a slave costs around $45,000 a piece on average and a young female was around $65,000 and a young strong male was as high as $90,000.
Your quote is from a whacky Yahoo statistic that quotes "families"
A family could have 4 brothers with their families, 8 cousins with their families and 11 grandsons with their families for a total of 117 people all "owning" slaves.
Your stats, which only a fool would believe as most Americans do not know anything about statistics, lump all of them together as ONE family.
5 year olds do not own slaves, 12 year olds also but they were counted in the 1860 census as "potential" slave owners.
Only 2 % of southerners that were adults owned slaves.
My statistic is correct, and it's not from some "whacky yahoo" site, it's from reputable historians.
If a family owned slaves, they reaped the financial benefit of those slaves. It was considered a household "asset."
Here's some numbers for you to munch on.
Selected Statistics on Slavery in the United States
(unless otherwise noted, all data is as of the 1860 census)
Total number of slaves in the Lower South : 2,312,352 (47% of total population).
Total number of slaves in the Upper South: 1,208758 (29% of total population).
Total number of slaves in the Border States: 432,586 (13% of total population).
Almost one-third of all Southern families owned slaves. In Mississippi and South Carolina it approached one half. The total number of slave owners was 385,000 (including, in Louisiana, some free Negroes).
As for the number of slaves owned by each master, 88% held fewer than twenty, and nearly 50% held fewer than five. (A complete table on slave-owning percentages is given at the bottom of this page.)
For comparison's sake, let it be noted that in the 1950's, only 2% of American families owned corporation stocks equal in value to the 1860 value of a single slave. Thus, slave ownership was much more widespread in the South than corporate investment was in 1950's America.
On a typical plantation (more than 20 slaves) the capital value of the slaves was greater than the capital value of the land and implements.
Slavery was profitable, although a large part of the profit was in the increased value of the slaves themselves. With only 30% of the nation's (free) population, the South had 60% of the "wealthiest men." The 1860 per capita wealth in the South was $3,978; in the North it was $2,040.
Selected Bibliography
- Battle Cry of Freedom, by James McPherson
- Ordeal by Fire, by James McPherson
- The Confederate Nation, by Emory Thomas
- Civil War Day by Day, by E.B. Long
- Ordeal of the Union (8 vols.) by Allan Nevins
- Reader's Companion to American History, by Eric Foner and John Garrity
Selected Statistics
Need pictures?
In the eleven states that formed the Confederacy, there were in aggregate just over 1 million free households, which between them represented 316,632 slaveholdersmeaning that somewhere between one-quarter and one-third of households in the Confederate States counted among its assets at least one human being.
Interesting how the conversation gravitated to this subject from a discussion about the culpability and guilt of George Zimmerman....but it is satisfying to see yet another Confederate flag waving apologist get his ass handed to him.