shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 29,372
- 26,433
- 2,405
The numbers themselves are astounding.
He says that not only are these people pretending to be independent, but he stated that once you have high powered lawyers on the case they won't stop until they get someone. 97% Of the DOJ giving to Clinton defies logic to me, she was possibly the most corrupt politician "on the take" in U.S history, fully distrusted by the U.S voter.
Is he completely accurate about this witch hunt being conducted against the President of the United States of America, lead by Mueller? I'm not sure how such a heavy bias can engage in an investigation without some of this subjectivity guiding their decisions.
If this is in fact a witch hunt, what recourse does the President have at this point? If it's not legitimate it's costing the taxpayer a great deal of cash while they drag it out. Will it take another month or another three years?
He says that not only are these people pretending to be independent, but he stated that once you have high powered lawyers on the case they won't stop until they get someone. 97% Of the DOJ giving to Clinton defies logic to me, she was possibly the most corrupt politician "on the take" in U.S history, fully distrusted by the U.S voter.
Is he completely accurate about this witch hunt being conducted against the President of the United States of America, lead by Mueller? I'm not sure how such a heavy bias can engage in an investigation without some of this subjectivity guiding their decisions.
If this is in fact a witch hunt, what recourse does the President have at this point? If it's not legitimate it's costing the taxpayer a great deal of cash while they drag it out. Will it take another month or another three years?
Last edited:
