bodecea
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 185,066
- 66,558
Any excuse in a trumpanzee storm, eh?Liar. There was no active investigation and it wasn't only Biden whi wanted him out.Liar. Shokin was not actively investigating Burisma when he was fired.So clueless.
Biden was acting in faith of Many Countries that wanted Shokin Fired, for NOT investigating Burisma.
I'm doubting that buckeye has any idea who Shokin actually is.
Google it dude. You might learn something, besides that RWI talking points.
Do you on the left just accept any ridiculous thing your puppet masters tell you without question? Don't you see how silly they make you look when you repeat them????
You are trying to tell us, that Joe forced Ukraine to fire Shokin FOR NOT investigating a company that his son was working for; a job he was never qualified for; a job that paid him 83K every month and he had to do nothing for that money? You really expect anybody to believe that???
Sure, that makes a lot of sense. To a leftist, that makes more sense than Shoking WAS investigating Burisma and possibly money laundering by Hunter, and that's why Joe made sure he was fired.
Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim
But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
he was in the process of opening an investigation and joe biden had him fired for it,,,
but you already knew that didnt you,,,
Needless to say, after Shokin was removed, the Burisma investigation was re-opened. Burisma's owner was fined millions and only then was the investigation concluded.
when did I say active you stupid fuck???