No one seems to wonder if Conservatives can somehow get more graphic and explicit than Liberals. "Seriously" seems to be as far as the Kelly woman is able to go. The matter involves Hedi, the "Snarlinator," vs. Melania, "The Billionaire Avengeress."
Megyn Kelly blasts Trump for posting unflattering Heidi Cruz picture
Usual 19th Century Republican thinking centers on a limited role for central government. This could be said that(?). The actual Republican Response to Immigration is a larger role for Central Government, instead. The Republican Response to suicidal kamikazes is a larger role for Central Government instead. In the midst of all that, the centerpiece concept in support of that seems to be to abolish the IRS, or start a tariff-based trade war?
On its face, the Republicans offer not much clear thinking at--with the Centerpiece "Wall/Fence" concept even. Even in Brussels there is outcry about the security agencies, going fortress medieval, walling themselves off from one another. Little gets done. Lethal conflict is the usual outcome. Eisenhower started rounding up illegals, possibly based on his experience of walking through the death camps of WWII. They were German and Japanese. The Italian army may have been sent to them too.
The Wall goes up: To Stem the current outflow of illegal entrants, able to start raping back at home? Maybe that's why Mexico will pay for it?
Centerpiece Republican, substantive debate--no longer even centers on the "Girly-Guys" theme anymore(?). There is somewhere a videotape of Secretary Clinton actually barking--apparently an appeal Republicans to cross-over(?)! Now there are photographs, surfacing! Courtrooms appear to understand how this works!
I would have suggested that the Secretary's performance indicated a Foreign Policy that little kids might want to take home--in opposition to the Conservative, apparent agendas.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations--understand community. . . .things!)
Megyn Kelly blasts Trump for posting unflattering Heidi Cruz picture
Usual 19th Century Republican thinking centers on a limited role for central government. This could be said that(?). The actual Republican Response to Immigration is a larger role for Central Government, instead. The Republican Response to suicidal kamikazes is a larger role for Central Government instead. In the midst of all that, the centerpiece concept in support of that seems to be to abolish the IRS, or start a tariff-based trade war?
On its face, the Republicans offer not much clear thinking at--with the Centerpiece "Wall/Fence" concept even. Even in Brussels there is outcry about the security agencies, going fortress medieval, walling themselves off from one another. Little gets done. Lethal conflict is the usual outcome. Eisenhower started rounding up illegals, possibly based on his experience of walking through the death camps of WWII. They were German and Japanese. The Italian army may have been sent to them too.
The Wall goes up: To Stem the current outflow of illegal entrants, able to start raping back at home? Maybe that's why Mexico will pay for it?
Centerpiece Republican, substantive debate--no longer even centers on the "Girly-Guys" theme anymore(?). There is somewhere a videotape of Secretary Clinton actually barking--apparently an appeal Republicans to cross-over(?)! Now there are photographs, surfacing! Courtrooms appear to understand how this works!
I would have suggested that the Secretary's performance indicated a Foreign Policy that little kids might want to take home--in opposition to the Conservative, apparent agendas.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations--understand community. . . .things!)
