GOP's Fear Mongering Backfiring on GOP Leaders

[rightwinger]

It is more than fear

Republicans are a party of hate. They do not disagree politically with Obama or Hillary..... They hate them

How do you convince your base that you need to negotiate with the president when your base hates him and considers him evil

 

[Picaro]

Hilarious stuff here, babbling about 'fear mongering' when the entire Democratic Party platform consists of nothing but fear mongering, and built entirely on lying. Here's a recap of one of the Democratic Party's favorite new cult 'movements' and fictions, one that has had deadly results for both police officers and hapless victims of the explosion of hate crimes and murders committed by its followers and fans, incited by the blatant media lies Democrats rely on totally in place of real policies. They have no record of anything they can point to, and it's all they're left with.

A Movement Built on Lies

 

[jc456]

As it turns out. Democrats made it all up.

Yeah, right, because we all know the Republican Party leaders are all for Trump.......

Well, they shouldn't be. He is not one of them. They are terrified of losing the lined pockets.

What do you mean he is not one of them? He has an "R" by his name....or did he start another party without telling anyone?

You know exactly what I am saying. He is not Establishment.

Establishment or not, he represents the Republican party, which is now in total chaos, and mostly because of loose lips Trump, who thinks that nasty quips and insults is the way to appear Presidential, never mind that he knows nothing. The leaders knew it all along and thought that he wouldn't get far....little did they realize that the Republican base was made up of racist bigots that would love his attitude and would care little that he is clueless and shows that he is clueless every time he opens his mouth.

there are those two words again. I'm still waiting for an example of Trump being a bigot or racist. Got one yet? It's been months now.

 

[jc456]

It is more than fear

Republicans are a party of hate. They do not disagree politically with Obama or Hillary..... They hate them

How do you convince your base that you need to negotiate with the president when your base hates him and considers him evil

says the guy spreading hate.

 

[Picaro]

Yeah, right, because we all know the Republican Party leaders are all for Trump.......

Well, they shouldn't be. He is not one of them. They are terrified of losing the lined pockets.

What do you mean he is not one of them? He has an "R" by his name....or did he start another party without telling anyone?

You know exactly what I am saying. He is not Establishment.

Establishment or not, he represents the Republican party, which is now in total chaos, and mostly because of loose lips Trump, who thinks that nasty quips and insults is the way to appear Presidential, never mind that he knows nothing. The leaders knew it all along and thought that he wouldn't get far....little did they realize that the Republican base was made up of racist bigots that would love his attitude and would care little that he is clueless and shows that he is clueless every time he opens his mouth.

there are those two words again. I'm still waiting for an example of Trump being a bigot or racist. Got one yet? It's been months now.

they have nothing factual to back up anything they claim about Trump, and they know they're openly lying, they just don't have any morals or principles and don't care.

 

[rightwinger]

Republicans have been headed for this for twenty five years. The low information voters, fed their daily ration of hate from the rightwing media are finally getting the candidate they want....Trump

 

[jasonnfree]

The Republican party is known for instilling fear on party members and now the very leaders who instill said fear, are experiencing some fear of their own. Since Trump has been acting so erratically lately claiming that the system is rigged, the election is rigged and the media conspires against him, they are afraid that Donald is going to quit....so they are discussing what they are going to do if he does quit.

It's a toss up now, as to who is whackier....the Donald or the Republican party. Of course he isn't going to quit....he's just setting himself up for the beating he is going to take and looking for an excuse as to why he lost, once the election is over.

They had their chance at ousting him at the start of their convention, but like fools they believed that they could control Donald, make him look presidential and then tell him what to do once he was President. Little did they know that he would just feign obedience long enough to get their support and then like the idiot that he is, self destruct right before their eyes.

It's a sad time for the Republican party....most of it's members here on this forum no longer claim to be Republican and the wiser ones claim to not support Trump....but they don't fool anybody....they're still hoping that "Unicorn" fairytales still come true and Donald will all of a sudden become the intelligent, experienced President they have always dreamed of.


Donald Trump’s relations with the Republican Party – and his political fortunes – worsened dramatically Wednesday, as party leaders fretted openly about the inability of his campaign staff to control him and even began to discuss what to do if their unpredictable nominee suddenly quit the race.

“A sense of panic is rising” among GOP elected officials and operatives, said Ed Rogers, a former Republican White House official.

“Serious, senior lawyers” have begun researching how the rules would work if the party had to replace Trump on the ticket, a senior GOP figure in Washington with close ties to the party hierarchy confirmed.
'A sense of panic is rising' among Republicans over Trump, including talk of what to do if he quits

Fear mongering. Like the silly fear of thousands of muslim refugees (mostly young males), being a danger to the USA even though muslims seem to have cornered the market on terrorism. The democrat candidate is guaranteed to not only continue obama's invasion of these people, but to outdo him. Fear isn't necessarily an uncalled for reaction.

 

[tigerred59]

Are you crazy? If Trump quit, that would make it a 100 times easier to vote against Hillary.

I know DOZENS of people right now, that the only reason...... THE ONLY REASON, they are voting for Hillary, is because they don't like Trump.

If Trump were to step down, Hillary would lose millions of votes. Besides you people on the left have been wrong about Trump for an entire year. You are lacking on the credibility side of Trumps inevitable doom.

I agree, if Trump were to step down, anybody but Hillary would win the white house. People do not like Hillary, they just don't have better choices.

 

[rightwinger]

Are you crazy? If Trump quit, that would make it a 100 times easier to vote against Hillary.

I know DOZENS of people right now, that the only reason...... THE ONLY REASON, they are voting for Hillary, is because they don't like Trump.

If Trump were to step down, Hillary would lose millions of votes. Besides you people on the left have been wrong about Trump for an entire year. You are lacking on the credibility side of Trumps inevitable doom.

I agree, if Trump were to step down, anybody but Hillary would win the white house. People do not like Hillary, they just don't have better choices.

Republicans had 17 candidates of which four were capable of beating Hillary

They chose Trump

 

[jasonnfree]

Republicans have been headed for this for twenty five years. The low information voters, fed their daily ration of hate from the rightwing media are finally getting the candidate they want....Trump

And he's less ethically challenged and carries less baggage than clinton. She makes mistakes like endangering the security of this country with her emails and then sez "whoops, I won't do that any more. She's either too stupid to be prez, or too dishonest, and I don't think she's stupid. Just can't be trusted, same as her hubby.

 

[tigerred59]

Republicans have been headed for this for twenty five years. The low information voters, fed their daily ration of hate from the rightwing media are finally getting the candidate they want....Trump

It was bound to happen, a Trump. The GOP for decades have ran fear campaigns just to get elected and once elected, they do absolutely nothing for the idiots that fell for their bullshit and these people are pissed. Has nothing to do with Obama, minorities etc...and everything to do with their voting failures. And I don't blame these people one bit. The GOP will do just about anything to get elected, cheat, gerrymander districts, disenfranchise minority voters, scare the hell out of whites, promise jobs and walls, etc and they never do a gotdamned thing once in office, but fillerbuster, hold bs hearings and take endless vacations.

 

[jasonnfree]

Are you crazy? If Trump quit, that would make it a 100 times easier to vote against Hillary.

I know DOZENS of people right now, that the only reason...... THE ONLY REASON, they are voting for Hillary, is because they don't like Trump.

If Trump were to step down, Hillary would lose millions of votes. Besides you people on the left have been wrong about Trump for an entire year. You are lacking on the credibility side of Trumps inevitable doom.

I agree, if Trump were to step down, anybody but Hillary would win the white house. People do not like Hillary, they just don't have better choices.

Republicans had 17 candidates of which four were capable of beating Hillary

They chose Trump

The average american didn't trust the other four it looks like. Trump was the most unrepublican of the bunch.

 

[charwin95]

Hitlery couldn't draw flies to her campaign appearances and we now know that caucuses and some primaries were rigged for Hitlery and she had the " super delegate card" to play. If leftards don't understand how rigged the system is? Nothing will...they are lost in an abyss of stupidity.

You are clearly delusional. Hillary has received more votes than Trump. And the Democratic convention was everything the Republican party hoped their convention could have been. And you are full of crap that the caucuses were rigged. Post some proof of it. That the DNC leaders showed some bias on e-mails does not translate to rigging any caucuses. Where do you come up with such crap?

Your party is so disjointed and the Republican leaders are trying to save it before buffoon Trump (who makes G W Bush look like a Rhodes scholar) completely destroys it. But they aren't smart enough to figure out what to do. Now they are plotting to dump him, even at this late date and it is not going to go in their favor. Trump isn't going to win, but he is going to destroy the Republican party either way.

"You are clearly delusional. Hillary has received more votes than Trump. And the Democratic convention was everything the Republican party hoped their convention could have been"

Actually, no one knows how many votes Hitlery ACTUALLY got because as we have all learned is that the vote totals were compromised. As far as the convention goes? They had to hire people to come sit in the seats after Sanders supporters walked out so they could protest outside the convention but if you want to call that a "blue ribbon day" for leftards? Be my guest and this was right on the heels of Bill ":drop trou" meeting with Lorretta Lynch privately while her staff waited on the tarmac just before Comey declared that "yeah, she did mishandled sensitive security documents with an unsecured server and she was less than forthcoming with ALL her e-mails but no charges will be filed" . Anyone that can look at that and not see how the fix was in is utterly stupid, deaf AND dumb.

No votes were compromised. You're the one that mouths off and never posts any proof.....just like Trump, lying is your best asset. Please post some proof that votes were compromised, otherwise I'll just regard your comment as more BS from the lying "right-wing-for-Trump-brigade".


"And you are full of crap that the caucuses were rigged. Post some proof of it"

Two words..... "Super delegates"....nuff said.

That's not proof...just your own conjecture. Super delegates have been there way before the primaries began and Bernie Sanders is one himself.....so, no, you can't dismiss your fat lie with that answer. They voted for who they wanted, that's legitimate. Sanders tried to convince them to change, they didn't, so you're grossly mistaken and have no proof to back up your bs.


"That the DNC leaders showed some bias on e-mails does not translate to rigging any caucuses. Where do you come up with such crap?"

Showed some bias????? That's like saying you can buy a few things at Wal-Mart. They were plotting against Sanders and were trying to come up with strategies to hurt him....I thought they were on the same side and it was about "may the best man or woman win"?

They may have been discussing ways to derail Sanders but those ideas never came to fruition....just written words. Again, show some proof how they affected votes if voters didn't even know about the e-mails until after the primaries were over. You can't can you?



"Your party is so disjointed and the Republican leaders are trying to save it before buffoon Trump (who makes G W Bush look like a Rhodes scholar) completely destroys it. But they aren't smart enough to figure out what to do. Now they are plotting to dump him, even at this late date and it is not going to go in their favor. Trump isn't going to win, but he is going to destroy the Republican party either way."

I do not participate in elections because I am not a U.S citizen and thus no longer under the UCC because I reclaimed my birthright so now I am simply an American. I know that elections are nothing but theater and that a "shadow government" has been calling the shots since the Federal Reserve Act was illegally passed in 1913. The last president that tried to do right by us was JFK and he was murdered for doing so. Since that coup de'etat, the "establishment" has made sure that whichever candidate is selected is "on board" with their agenda. I will say that if I had to vote, I would pick Trump over the Hitlkery simply because he has hacked off the establishment puppets on both sides of the aisle and Trump has said things (as did Sanders) that needed to be said but cultural marxism is still doing it's dirty work of keeping people from saying what they are seeing...fuck 'em...I will never stop speaking my mind and if someone is insulted? They can get over it ....or not.....

You're not even a US citizen? 'Nuf said.....you have no say so in this election. You can post all the bs that you want....it has no meaning because you really don't even count.

While I have no use for the neocons, I especially despise the Fabian socialist left that are really communists at heart. They would cheer the fact that non-commies were sent off to "re-education camps" or simply eradicated....because that is what commies are all about. Do you get the message that I am sending?

I have one word for you......"LEAVE". If you don't like our country nobody is forcing you to remain. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Your message/s don't count....get it? You're of no relevance.

I know more than you and I write the truth regardless of how it might offend people from either bought and paid for political party. I am an American and I opted out of the UCC that defined me as a U.S citizen (this pledging allegiance to the city/state corporate entity that is Washington D.C headquarters of USA.INC via the Act of 1871) by reclaiming my all caps strawman that was created with the birth certificate that was written on bond paper. Due to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of 1933, all future citizens became surety/collateral on the debt. Under the UCC, anything can be monetized and used as a negotiable instrument. A collateral trust/account was created with your all-caps strawman and when you sign up for a Social Security card, you make "da gubermint" the trustee of that situs trust. I will do whatever I want and I don't need your permission or advice to do a damn thing. Are we clear on that? I will keep on sharing the things I know due to thousands upon thousands of hours of research and reading that I do anywhere from 8 to 14 hours a day. I have woken up HUNDREDS of people over the last four years and in turn they have shared their knowledge as well. We don't want communism, we don't want socialism and we don't need a central bank owned by international bankers to "manage" our currency while charging us usury for fiat money created from nothing. We don't believe that the government should be a "for profit" entity that is owned by the same banking oligarchs that own the Federal Reserve....you see, I know more than you....infinitely more. You are a mere child.

Hope this helps!!!

Nope..... Only people like you believed that kind of non sense.

 

[charwin95]

Yeah, right, because we all know the Republican Party leaders are all for Trump.......

Well, they shouldn't be. He is not one of them. They are terrified of losing the lined pockets.

What do you mean he is not one of them? He has an "R" by his name....or did he start another party without telling anyone?

You know exactly what I am saying. He is not Establishment.

Establishment or not, he represents the Republican party, which is now in total chaos, and mostly because of loose lips Trump, who thinks that nasty quips and insults is the way to appear Presidential, never mind that he knows nothing. The leaders knew it all along and thought that he wouldn't get far....little did they realize that the Republican base was made up of racist bigots that would love his attitude and would care little that he is clueless and shows that he is clueless every time he opens his mouth.

there are those two words again. I'm still waiting for an example of Trump being a bigot or racist. Got one yet? It's been months now.

Hope this helps. Just wondering where you've been in the last 12 months? Or you just ignoring the fact that Trump is a bad boy.


Donald Trump's racial comments about Hispanic judge in Trump University case.
By Tom Kertscher on Wednesday, June 8th, 2016 at 4:29 p.m.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (left), a Wisconsin Republican, criticized GOP presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump for Trump's racial remarks about a federal judge.
House Speaker Paul Ryan (left), a Wisconsin Republican, criticized GOP presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump for Trump's racial remarks about a federal judge.
Condemnation of comments made by Donald Trump about a federal judge reached the heights of the national Republican leadership when U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan rebuked the GOP's presumptive presidential nominee on June 7, 2016.

"I disavow these comments," the Wisconsin Republican said. "Claiming a person can’t do the job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment. I think that should be absolutely disavowed. It’s absolutely unacceptable."

 

[jc456]

Well, they shouldn't be. He is not one of them. They are terrified of losing the lined pockets.

What do you mean he is not one of them? He has an "R" by his name....or did he start another party without telling anyone?

You know exactly what I am saying. He is not Establishment.

Establishment or not, he represents the Republican party, which is now in total chaos, and mostly because of loose lips Trump, who thinks that nasty quips and insults is the way to appear Presidential, never mind that he knows nothing. The leaders knew it all along and thought that he wouldn't get far....little did they realize that the Republican base was made up of racist bigots that would love his attitude and would care little that he is clueless and shows that he is clueless every time he opens his mouth.

there are those two words again. I'm still waiting for an example of Trump being a bigot or racist. Got one yet? It's been months now.

Hope this helps. Just wondering where you've been in the last 12 months? Or you just ignoring the fact that Trump is a bad boy.


Donald Trump's racial comments about Hispanic judge in Trump University case.
By Tom Kertscher on Wednesday, June 8th, 2016 at 4:29 p.m.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (left), a Wisconsin Republican, criticized GOP presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump for Trump's racial remarks about a federal judge.
House Speaker Paul Ryan (left), a Wisconsin Republican, criticized GOP presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump for Trump's racial remarks about a federal judge.
Condemnation of comments made by Donald Trump about a federal judge reached the heights of the national Republican leadership when U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan rebuked the GOP's presumptive presidential nominee on June 7, 2016.

"I disavow these comments," the Wisconsin Republican said. "Claiming a person can’t do the job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment. I think that should be absolutely disavowed. It’s absolutely unacceptable."

so what's the comment?

 

[charwin95]

What do you mean he is not one of them? He has an "R" by his name....or did he start another party without telling anyone?

You know exactly what I am saying. He is not Establishment.

Establishment or not, he represents the Republican party, which is now in total chaos, and mostly because of loose lips Trump, who thinks that nasty quips and insults is the way to appear Presidential, never mind that he knows nothing. The leaders knew it all along and thought that he wouldn't get far....little did they realize that the Republican base was made up of racist bigots that would love his attitude and would care little that he is clueless and shows that he is clueless every time he opens his mouth.

there are those two words again. I'm still waiting for an example of Trump being a bigot or racist. Got one yet? It's been months now.

Hope this helps. Just wondering where you've been in the last 12 months? Or you just ignoring the fact that Trump is a bad boy.


Donald Trump's racial comments about Hispanic judge in Trump University case.
By Tom Kertscher on Wednesday, June 8th, 2016 at 4:29 p.m.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (left), a Wisconsin Republican, criticized GOP presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump for Trump's racial remarks about a federal judge.
House Speaker Paul Ryan (left), a Wisconsin Republican, criticized GOP presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump for Trump's racial remarks about a federal judge.
Condemnation of comments made by Donald Trump about a federal judge reached the heights of the national Republican leadership when U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan rebuked the GOP's presumptive presidential nominee on June 7, 2016.

"I disavow these comments," the Wisconsin Republican said. "Claiming a person can’t do the job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment. I think that should be absolutely disavowed. It’s absolutely unacceptable."

so what's the comment?

Trump is a racist, bigot etc. etc....... That number of GOPs are abandoning him........ A danger to national security.

 

[LuckyDuck]

Am considering voting for my dead dog. At least he can't implement far-right wing nonsense and reward fat-cat wealthy donors or far-left wing nonsense and their goal to change this nation to an Islamic one over time. He also won't send troops into some far off nation based upon false flags of hidden WMD's.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Am considering voting for my dead dog. At least he can't implement far-right wing nonsense and reward fat-cat wealthy donors or far-left wing nonsense and their goal to change this nation to an Islamic one over time. He also won't send troops into some far off nation based upon false flags of hidden WMD's.

".......their goal to change this nation to an Islamic one over time""" Seriously Bubba.? Get help!

 

[LuckyDuck]

Am considering voting for my dead dog. At least he can't implement far-right wing nonsense and reward fat-cat wealthy donors or far-left wing nonsense and their goal to change this nation to an Islamic one over time. He also won't send troops into some far off nation based upon false flags of hidden WMD's.

".......their goal to change this nation to an Islamic one over time""" Seriously Bubba.? Get help!

Pew polls have found that the significant majority of Muslims favor Sharia Law (which is incompatible with a free secular western society). Sunnis tend to follow a more radical form of Islam than Shiites and the majority of Muslims entering the US as so-called refugees are Sunni. Read the Pew Research Foundation, it cites that the Muslim population in the US will expand by 197% by 2050. Muslims have 3.1 children compared with the 2.3 of average westerners in the states.
Our generation will not live to see this become an Islamic nation, however, our great-great-great granddaughters/sons will be enslaved to it. As the numbers of Muslims increased in Belgium, they eventually started a political Islamic Party. Once the numbers are sufficient here, the same will happen and once they have enough politicians in the government, the US Constitution will be tossed in favor of Sharia Law. To believe otherwise is to be naïve and to have not learned from history.

 

[Correll]

The Republican party is known for instilling fear on party members... if he quits

Says the man who's side is telling everyone that their enemy is a NAZI.