Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,828
- 1,790
All right, I'm prejudiced, alma mater. Links and such at site.
Chicago Boyz Blog Archive Avoiding the Stalemate State
Chicago Boyz Blog Archive Avoiding the Stalemate State
Avoiding the Stalemate State
Posted by TM Lutas on October 20th, 2010
Get ready for a lot of stories bemoaning the coming period of political gridlock in the federal government. Jacob S Hacker and Paul Pierson offer up a typical sample of the genre in The American Prospect. But it doesnt have to be that way if the GOP in the House acts in a pro-government/small-government way.
A united GOP in the House could insist on a new paradigm for passing legislation, passing all the good stuff first. Yes, it gets less passed, but isnt that the point? The House can, legitimately, say that its not shutting down the government. It can bang out funding for the essential programs in each department in the spring, pass (or not) the middle tier popularity programs in the summer, and then present the real stinkers in the fall, right before elections.
There would be no government shut down. The Parks people could not shut down Mt. Rushmore and the George Washington Monument because their operations would be funded. Programs that could not get a majority to vote for them would be shut down but that happens every year. Its how the system is supposed to work.
The political choices for Democrats would be very unattractive. Their attempts to stuff in budget stinkers into the must-pass bill will be turned back with the reasonable explanation that the program is funded in a different bill and that it will get a vote, but not here. Once the early bills pass, government shutdown is averted.
Is the GOP going to be smart enough to create a better way to fund the government? I hope so. What concerns me is that nobody else seems to be talking about appropriation sequence passage reform.