Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
In such cases, it's the AG who signs one.
Capo Holder recused himself. It was a sub-Capo who signed them. There are questions whether they were even submitted to a FISA judge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In such cases, it's the AG who signs one.
In such cases, it's the AG who signs one.
Capo Holder recused himself. It was a sub-Capo who signed them. There are questions whether they were even submitted to a FISA judge.
In such cases, it's the AG who signs one.
Capo Holder recused himself. It was a sub-Capo who signed them. There are questions whether they were even submitted to a FISA judge.
FISA is required for surveillance, like wiretapping phones. Unless other information is revealed about the gov't monitoring actual phone calls, FISA wouldn't be applicable in this case since the gov't was only looking for phone records, not pursuing surveillance of phone calls.
FISA is required for surveillance, like wiretapping phones. Unless other information is revealed about the gov't monitoring actual phone calls, FISA wouldn't be applicable in this case since the gov't was only looking for phone records, not pursuing surveillance of phone calls.
Then the concept of a warrant is an absurdity. The DoJ grants the DoJ a warrant to do whatever the fuck the DoJ wants to do?
Now THAT is some checks and balances....
So what the sub-Capo did was issue subpoenas - no warrants were involved. Ergo, this is IDENTICAL to what you of the left SCREAMED about Bush doing....
Alas, there is no hypocrisy like demopocrisy.
You've already proven that you don't know what you're talking about. Hence, I predict you could get your own conservative talk show on AM radio. The only question is whether you would be any good at selling gold coins and/or get rich schemes about how to flip houses.
Weren't the phone records obtained AFTER a subpoena was issued?
Yet, for some reason, conservatives have a problem with that despite the fact that they didn't have a problem with Bush authorizing wiretaps without a FISA court warrant?
Could someone explain that to me?
have you seen a subpoena? Only speculation on who may have signed off on one.
In such cases, it's the AG who signs one.
BOOOOOOOSSSHHHH!
Hmmm, sounds kind of hollow.
I think you'll need more to save the toddler in chief.
Stop with the deflection. If the press is in tank for Obama, it's hard to explain why he's received much more criticism for doing the same things Bush did.
Except he didnt. Well, he did some of the same things. Gitmo? The thing that libs bashed Bush for and Obama has continued. Afghanistan? Bush got bashed for winning, Obama gets kudos for losing. Iraq, ditto. Drones, ditto.
Yes, Bush got attacked for doing what Obama gets praised for doing.
It will be interesting to see how AG Holder spins THIS one.
WASHINGTON (AP) The Justice Department secretly obtained two months of telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press in what the news cooperative's top executive called a "massive and unprecedented intrusion" into how news organizations gather the news.
The records obtained by the Justice Department listed incoming and outgoing calls, and the duration of each call, for the work and personal phone numbers of individual reporters, general AP office numbers in New York, Washington and Hartford, Conn., and the main number for AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery, according to attorneys for the AP.