Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't the Bible teach that money is the root of all evil?
No.
Then why does it say so?
No he wasnt, as history shows. A localized collapse (and there can be different reasons such as weather change) does not prove Mathus' theory. You could even argue the Mayans collapsed because they introduced socialism and people stopped working.He was actually right. Easter Island and the Mayan civilization collapsed due to overpopulation .LOL! No, it isnt. And btw Malthus predicted overpopulation would be a threat, yeah over 100 years ago. He was wrong then and that view is wrong now In fact the opposite is the problem.“If machines produce everything we need, the outcome will depend on how things are distributed.” Hawking continued, “Everyone can enjoy a life of luxurious leisure if the machine-produced wealth is shared, or most people can end up miserably poor if the machine-owners successfully lobby against wealth redistribution. So far, the trend seems to be toward the second option, with technology driving ever-increasing inequality."
We have been warned.
Stephen Hawking Warns About The Greatest Threat To Humanity | Zero Hedge
So we've been warned about the greatest "thread"? Ok, thanks.
What a bunch of liberal drivel. Capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty and has created more prosperity and societal growth than any other system in human history.
China is a good example of a country that used to follow all the economic policies that our liberals advocate but that has ditched them and become far wealthier as a result.
Context man, context . Take into account the context.
Was overpopulation a threat to mankind 100 years ago ? No.
Is overpopulation a threat to mankid today.Yes, it is.
Conversely , full automation and capitalism combined pose a threat to humanity.
A given territory can only sustain about 1,400 people per square kilometre, so an actuall worldwide collapse can only happen if such threshold is reached. In the mean time we can expect local collapses if countries surpass such limit.
I do ... now get some free (gratis) economic education courtesy of me and some other 3,500 donnors :why dont you left-wingnutjobs just give more of what you have??
Easter Island collapsed due to a lack of environmental policy : they cut down all the trees. No trees, no timber , no fishing boats, followed by deaths until they reached a sustainable level.No he wasnt, as history shows. A localized collapse (and there can be different reasons such as weather change) does not prove Mathus' theory. You could even argue the Mayans collapsed because they introduced socialism and people stopped working.He was actually right. Easter Island and the Mayan civilization collapsed due to overpopulation .LOL! No, it isnt. And btw Malthus predicted overpopulation would be a threat, yeah over 100 years ago. He was wrong then and that view is wrong now In fact the opposite is the problem.“If machines produce everything we need, the outcome will depend on how things are distributed.” Hawking continued, “Everyone can enjoy a life of luxurious leisure if the machine-produced wealth is shared, or most people can end up miserably poor if the machine-owners successfully lobby against wealth redistribution. So far, the trend seems to be toward the second option, with technology driving ever-increasing inequality."
We have been warned.
Stephen Hawking Warns About The Greatest Threat To Humanity | Zero Hedge
So we've been warned about the greatest "thread"? Ok, thanks.
What a bunch of liberal drivel. Capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty and has created more prosperity and societal growth than any other system in human history.
China is a good example of a country that used to follow all the economic policies that our liberals advocate but that has ditched them and become far wealthier as a result.
Context man, context . Take into account the context.
Was overpopulation a threat to mankind 100 years ago ? No.
Is overpopulation a threat to mankid today.Yes, it is.
Conversely , full automation and capitalism combined pose a threat to humanity.
A given territory can only sustain about 1,400 people per square kilometre, so an actuall worldwide collapse can only happen if such threshold is reached. In the mean time we can expect local collapses if countries surpass such limit.
Many places have population density well over 1400/sq meter. They seem to be doing fine.
You can never win against a conservative ... ah , but anyway , thanks.CultureCitizen has won the debate!
So actualluy none of them collapsed due to overpopulation. Another liberal claim refuted.Easter Island collapsed due to a lack of environmental policy : they cut down all the trees. No trees, no timber , no fishing boats, followed by deaths until they reached a sustainable level.No he wasnt, as history shows. A localized collapse (and there can be different reasons such as weather change) does not prove Mathus' theory. You could even argue the Mayans collapsed because they introduced socialism and people stopped working.He was actually right. Easter Island and the Mayan civilization collapsed due to overpopulation .LOL! No, it isnt. And btw Malthus predicted overpopulation would be a threat, yeah over 100 years ago. He was wrong then and that view is wrong now In fact the opposite is the problem.So we've been warned about the greatest "thread"? Ok, thanks.
What a bunch of liberal drivel. Capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty and has created more prosperity and societal growth than any other system in human history.
China is a good example of a country that used to follow all the economic policies that our liberals advocate but that has ditched them and become far wealthier as a result.
Context man, context . Take into account the context.
Was overpopulation a threat to mankind 100 years ago ? No.
Is overpopulation a threat to mankid today.Yes, it is.
Conversely , full automation and capitalism combined pose a threat to humanity.
A given territory can only sustain about 1,400 people per square kilometre, so an actuall worldwide collapse can only happen if such threshold is reached. In the mean time we can expect local collapses if countries surpass such limit.
Many places have population density well over 1400/sq meter. They seem to be doing fine.
Mayans were not socialists. They collapsed because they overpopulated the zone, and then a drought hit them.
A similar situation is happening in California, luckily the US is centuries more advanced than the mayans, so I am confident the outcome will be different.
I do ... now get some free (gratis) economic education courtesy of me and some other 3,500 donnors :why dont you left-wingnutjobs just give more of what you have??
Easter Island collapsed due to a lack of environmental policy : they cut down all the trees. No trees, no timber , no fishing boats, followed by deaths until they reached a sustainable level.No he wasnt, as history shows. A localized collapse (and there can be different reasons such as weather change) does not prove Mathus' theory. You could even argue the Mayans collapsed because they introduced socialism and people stopped working.He was actually right. Easter Island and the Mayan civilization collapsed due to overpopulation .LOL! No, it isnt. And btw Malthus predicted overpopulation would be a threat, yeah over 100 years ago. He was wrong then and that view is wrong now In fact the opposite is the problem.So we've been warned about the greatest "thread"? Ok, thanks.
What a bunch of liberal drivel. Capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty and has created more prosperity and societal growth than any other system in human history.
China is a good example of a country that used to follow all the economic policies that our liberals advocate but that has ditched them and become far wealthier as a result.
Context man, context . Take into account the context.
Was overpopulation a threat to mankind 100 years ago ? No.
Is overpopulation a threat to mankid today.Yes, it is.
Conversely , full automation and capitalism combined pose a threat to humanity.
A given territory can only sustain about 1,400 people per square kilometre, so an actuall worldwide collapse can only happen if such threshold is reached. In the mean time we can expect local collapses if countries surpass such limit.
Many places have population density well over 1400/sq meter. They seem to be doing fine.
Mayans were not socialists. They collapsed because they overpopulated the zone, and then a drought hit them.
A similar situation is happening in California, luckily the US is centuries more advanced than the mayans, so I am confident the outcome will be different.
CultureCitizen has won the debate!
Easter Island collapsed due to a lack of environmental policy : they cut down all the trees. No trees, no timber , no fishing boats, followed by deaths until they reached a sustainable level.No he wasnt, as history shows. A localized collapse (and there can be different reasons such as weather change) does not prove Mathus' theory. You could even argue the Mayans collapsed because they introduced socialism and people stopped working.He was actually right. Easter Island and the Mayan civilization collapsed due to overpopulation .LOL! No, it isnt. And btw Malthus predicted overpopulation would be a threat, yeah over 100 years ago. He was wrong then and that view is wrong now In fact the opposite is the problem.Context man, context . Take into account the context.
Was overpopulation a threat to mankind 100 years ago ? No.
Is overpopulation a threat to mankid today.Yes, it is.
Conversely , full automation and capitalism combined pose a threat to humanity.
A given territory can only sustain about 1,400 people per square kilometre, so an actuall worldwide collapse can only happen if such threshold is reached. In the mean time we can expect local collapses if countries surpass such limit.
Many places have population density well over 1400/sq meter. They seem to be doing fine.
Mayans were not socialists. They collapsed because they overpopulated the zone, and then a drought hit them.
A similar situation is happening in California, luckily the US is centuries more advanced than the mayans, so I am confident the outcome will be different.
You are talking about Carrying Capacity. In simplest terms take a square mile of forest, it will support a maximum number of deer, say 100. However, at the maximum they will eat all the food, cause alot of waste and destruction of the fauna, and cause a drastic die out until the level of deer that square mile can sustain has come back down to a sustainable level. The example of Easter Island is spot on. The most sustainable level for any population per its limited environment is 1/2 Carrying Capacity.
Because of our technology humans have extended the Carrying Capacity of a square mile of land for our species. But that technology only extends it, it doesn't extend it to infinity. The growing lack of fresh water and greatly reduced fishing grounds around the world is a visible indication that resources are finite regardless of technology. And most of the human population on Earth reside in areas where technology has NOT extended the Carrying Capacity of an area.
And good lord, some people here have 'socialism' on the brain. WTF is that.
Easter Island collapsed due to a lack of environmental policy : they cut down all the trees. No trees, no timber , no fishing boats, followed by deaths until they reached a sustainable level.No he wasnt, as history shows. A localized collapse (and there can be different reasons such as weather change) does not prove Mathus' theory. You could even argue the Mayans collapsed because they introduced socialism and people stopped working.He was actually right. Easter Island and the Mayan civilization collapsed due to overpopulation .LOL! No, it isnt. And btw Malthus predicted overpopulation would be a threat, yeah over 100 years ago. He was wrong then and that view is wrong now In fact the opposite is the problem.
A given territory can only sustain about 1,400 people per square kilometre, so an actuall worldwide collapse can only happen if such threshold is reached. In the mean time we can expect local collapses if countries surpass such limit.
Many places have population density well over 1400/sq meter. They seem to be doing fine.
Mayans were not socialists. They collapsed because they overpopulated the zone, and then a drought hit them.
A similar situation is happening in California, luckily the US is centuries more advanced than the mayans, so I am confident the outcome will be different.
You are talking about Carrying Capacity. In simplest terms take a square mile of forest, it will support a maximum number of deer, say 100. However, at the maximum they will eat all the food, cause alot of waste and destruction of the fauna, and cause a drastic die out until the level of deer that square mile can sustain has come back down to a sustainable level. The example of Easter Island is spot on. The most sustainable level for any population per its limited environment is 1/2 Carrying Capacity.
Because of our technology humans have extended the Carrying Capacity of a square mile of land for our species. But that technology only extends it, it doesn't extend it to infinity. The growing lack of fresh water and greatly reduced fishing grounds around the world is a visible indication that resources are finite regardless of technology. And most of the human population on Earth reside in areas where technology has NOT extended the Carrying Capacity of an area.
And good lord, some people here have 'socialism' on the brain. WTF is that.
good lord look at the self-impressed left-wing losers and their 70-line posts of stupid shit nobody will read!1
it's a message board you idiot
Easter Island collapsed due to a lack of environmental policy : they cut down all the trees. No trees, no timber , no fishing boats, followed by deaths until they reached a sustainable level.No he wasnt, as history shows. A localized collapse (and there can be different reasons such as weather change) does not prove Mathus' theory. You could even argue the Mayans collapsed because they introduced socialism and people stopped working.He was actually right. Easter Island and the Mayan civilization collapsed due to overpopulation .
A given territory can only sustain about 1,400 people per square kilometre, so an actuall worldwide collapse can only happen if such threshold is reached. In the mean time we can expect local collapses if countries surpass such limit.
Many places have population density well over 1400/sq meter. They seem to be doing fine.
Mayans were not socialists. They collapsed because they overpopulated the zone, and then a drought hit them.
A similar situation is happening in California, luckily the US is centuries more advanced than the mayans, so I am confident the outcome will be different.
You are talking about Carrying Capacity. In simplest terms take a square mile of forest, it will support a maximum number of deer, say 100. However, at the maximum they will eat all the food, cause alot of waste and destruction of the fauna, and cause a drastic die out until the level of deer that square mile can sustain has come back down to a sustainable level. The example of Easter Island is spot on. The most sustainable level for any population per its limited environment is 1/2 Carrying Capacity.
Because of our technology humans have extended the Carrying Capacity of a square mile of land for our species. But that technology only extends it, it doesn't extend it to infinity. The growing lack of fresh water and greatly reduced fishing grounds around the world is a visible indication that resources are finite regardless of technology. And most of the human population on Earth reside in areas where technology has NOT extended the Carrying Capacity of an area.
And good lord, some people here have 'socialism' on the brain. WTF is that.
good lord look at the self-impressed left-wing losers and their 70-line posts of stupid shit nobody will read!1
it's a message board you idiot
So don't read it. You aren't the person I'm talking to, yours is a world of Flintstone vitamins, nascar, and butterfly nets. Ignorance does not recognize its own ignorance, and therefore does not see the need to correct it.
I'm sure you didn't read that, or this, or this, or this.....
This thread has gone in the perfect directionEaster Island collapsed due to a lack of environmental policy : they cut down all the trees. No trees, no timber , no fishing boats, followed by deaths until they reached a sustainable level.No he wasnt, as history shows. A localized collapse (and there can be different reasons such as weather change) does not prove Mathus' theory. You could even argue the Mayans collapsed because they introduced socialism and people stopped working.He was actually right. Easter Island and the Mayan civilization collapsed due to overpopulation .LOL! No, it isnt. And btw Malthus predicted overpopulation would be a threat, yeah over 100 years ago. He was wrong then and that view is wrong now In fact the opposite is the problem.Context man, context . Take into account the context.
Was overpopulation a threat to mankind 100 years ago ? No.
Is overpopulation a threat to mankid today.Yes, it is.
Conversely , full automation and capitalism combined pose a threat to humanity.
A given territory can only sustain about 1,400 people per square kilometre, so an actuall worldwide collapse can only happen if such threshold is reached. In the mean time we can expect local collapses if countries surpass such limit.
Many places have population density well over 1400/sq meter. They seem to be doing fine.
Mayans were not socialists. They collapsed because they overpopulated the zone, and then a drought hit them.
A similar situation is happening in California, luckily the US is centuries more advanced than the mayans, so I am confident the outcome will be different.
You are talking about Carrying Capacity. In simplest terms take a square mile of forest, it will support a maximum number of deer, say 100. However, at the maximum they will eat all the food, cause alot of waste and destruction of the fauna, and cause a drastic die out until the level of deer that square mile can sustain has come back down to a sustainable level. The example of Easter Island is spot on. The most sustainable level for any population per its limited environment is 1/2 Carrying Capacity.
Because of our technology humans have extended the Carrying Capacity of a square mile of land for our species. But that technology only extends it, it doesn't extend it to infinity. The growing lack of fresh water and greatly reduced fishing grounds around the world is a visible indication that resources are finite regardless of technology. And most of the human population on Earth reside in areas where technology has NOT extended the Carrying Capacity of an area.
And good lord, some people here have 'socialism' on the brain. WTF is that.
Idiots. It is amazing how some of the smartest people can be so dumb.“If machines produce everything we need, the outcome will depend on how things are distributed.” Hawking continued, “Everyone can enjoy a life of luxurious leisure if the machine-produced wealth is shared, or most people can end up miserably poor if the machine-owners successfully lobby against wealth redistribution. So far, the trend seems to be toward the second option, with technology driving ever-increasing inequality."
We have been warned.
Stephen Hawking Warns About The Greatest Threat To Humanity | Zero Hedge
Capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty than anything else. IT's benefits are literally without precedence.
Why are you bringing politics into this. It's clearly a scientific discussion.bedowin62 said:Memo to left-wing losers; while you were reading a book your PROGRESSIVE POLICIES FAILED.
idiots and hypocrites
Why the obsfucation?what happened in Detroit?? lol
