martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 84,255
- 35,114
- 2,300
Mandatory insurance for any damage that is done by an owners gun doesn't seem that all that outrageous.
After all, we all have to buy insurance for damages that might be done with our vehicles.
If a gun ower buys a gun and loses it, and that gun ends up hurting somebody else, isn't the gun owner partially responsible, too?
Its because vehicles are not a constitutionally protected right. The right to travel is protected, but not the method.
On the second point if someone steals your car and then crashes it into some else, are you liable?