🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Gun Porn

Magnum Research BFR : 45-70


BFR_45-70_1.jpg



magnumresearchbfr45-70-jpg.25282



Shadow 355
 


The "Belt" of ammo. Seriously - Is that the ammo that goes to that Machine Gun?

It don't even look like 7.62X39 ammo let alone any other LONGER caliber / casing ( ?? 7.62x54 R )

Why is the ammo box on the right side of the weapon and the belt is to the left of the Machine Gun?

Cheek on weapon - good sight picture - estimate distance to target and make sight or barrel elevation adjustments - check back stop & beyond of target - butt of weapon in shoulder firmly - control breathing - squeeze the trigger and follow through with your shots.


Shadow 355
Never fired a belt fed have ya........ :eusa_whistle:


Looks like an old Kalashnikov (of some sort) Might even be ChiCom, it's a little hard to tell. At any rate it is definitely WWII. it's not link fed, and it IS a belt

Yep, just as I thought:

Modern Firearms - Kalashnikov PK / PKM


A good video.



The belt is a non-disintegrating belt, feeding from right to left.

It is a backwards gun - the belt feeds from right to left instead of left to right. And the rear sight raises ( elevates for range ) toward the rear of the weapon instead of the front. It is as I thought 7.62x54 R ( russian ) caliber.

Shadow 355


I want




Shoot, I couldn't afford the ammo to shoot it :(

I remember when I was stationed at Fort Knox, there was a privately owned range just North (I think) of the Fort that sponsored a "gun shoot" each year (just recalled the name - Knob Creek) at folks would go out there each year and fire pistols, rifles, sub machine guns, M2s, M60s and the like. You had to pay for the ammo - but you were free to fire after that. If memory serves - the 50 cal rounds were like $4.00 per.....it's better to be IN the Army....you get to shoot for free!!
 
160321123810-smartphone-gun-780x439.jpg


.380 Derringer

New gun coming out this year, looks like a smartphone
 
One of the foremen in my department whom retired, he was 4th shift foreman .

He tryed to coerce me into buying a Sig M-11. The new 9mm.

About the fall of 2009, he left a picture from an ad on the left side of his desk. Between the phone and the wall. That picture as I recall, was there for weeks.

I never had any interest in the Sig Sauer M-11, but someone evidently thought I did.

My next gun is going to be a .40 caliber.

Shadow 355
 
One of the foremen in my department whom retired, he was 4th shift foreman .

He tryed to coerce me into buying a Sig M-11. The new 9mm.

About the fall of 2009, he left a picture from an ad on the left side of his desk. Between the phone and the wall. That picture as I recall, was there for weeks.

I never had any interest in the Sig Sauer M-11, but someone evidently thought I did.

My next gun is going to be a .40 caliber.

Shadow 355


I (personally) never had much interest in the .40. Just didn't do much for me. Sort of like the .10mm. I made the decision years ago to hang my hat on the .45 and the 9mm. But that's just a personal choice (that works for me). Hell, I went crazy with both the 5.56 and the 7.62. I have a couple of AR10s as well as the AR15 (M4). However, if I need to reach out there - I still prefer Remington and Leupold.

But I did settle on one builder from my Army days - Sig Sauer. I HATED when my office made the switch from the 1911s to follow the NATO 9mm. But after a few trips to the range, I got used to it.

So, yes, I still have 1911 frames (in both .45 and 9mm) and I love them, but my P220 has YET to ever let me down. Never once, in nearly 5000 rounds. And, another "hidden" gem, is the SP2022 ($400). I have now fired about 2000 rounds through her and have yet to have a FTF or FTE. Pretty damned remarkable for a "budget" pistol. :)
 

Forum List

Back
Top