Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, you think you are being clever?Water vapor is a more powerful GHG that CO2. H2O is Mike Tyson and CO2 is Woody Allen
The "theory" of Manmade Global Climate Warming Change is that the relatively recent CO2 increase from 280 to 420PPM will cause an extinction level event rivaled by the dinosaur killing asteroid. "
But..."Water vapor is Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas. It’s responsible for about half of Earth’s greenhouse effect — the process that occurs when gases in Earth’s atmosphere trap the Sun’s heat." Steamy Relationships: How Atmospheric Water Vapor Amplifies Earth's Greenhouse Effect – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
If H2O is more powerful where are the studies showing H2O back in 1850? What are they today? Does an additional 100PPM H2O raise temperature more that CO2
Wow, you think you are being clever?
Here's the reality. You have to get water up to 212 F to get it to gaseous form. Obviously, it turns into vapor at lower temps, but the increase in water vapor in the atmosphere is effected by other greenhouse gases, not the other way around.
Wow, you think you are being clever?
Here's the reality. You have to get water up to 212 F to get it to gaseous form. Obviously, it turns into vapor at lower temps, but the increase in water vapor in the atmosphere is effected by other greenhouse gases, not the other way around.
Clouds aren't vapor, Frank, they're liquid water droplets.Cloud are 212F? Are you sure? I'm talking about on planet Earth
Joe, the boiling point of a liquid is the temperature at which its vapor pressure exceeds ambient pressure so that vapor can form below its surface. At all temperatures above freezing (in normal pressure regimes) vapor constantly escapes a liquid's surface. Molecules below the surface are bound in all directions to other molecules. At the surface, they lack any bounds above them and can obtain enough kinetic energy via normal Brownian motion to escape the other bounds and fly off into the air.Wow, you think you are being clever?
Here's the reality. You have to get water up to 212 F to get it to gaseous form. Obviously, it turns into vapor at lower temps, but the increase in water vapor in the atmosphere is effected by other greenhouse gases, not the other way around.
What question ? You’re just babbling.To a parrot, only parroting counts, there is no thinking....
Funny, none of your taxpayer funded climate "scientists" can answer the question
How did Co2 melt North America and freeze Greenland AT THE SAME TIME...
Nothing for your beaked birdbrain to parrot on that one - LOL!!
I answered that question for you here:How did Co2 melt North America and freeze Greenland AT THE SAME TIME...
www.usmessageboard.com
These crazy things called "thermometers" provide the evidence.Where's the "evidence" that increasing CO2 form 280 to 400PPM raises temperature, at all, much less 1.5C?
They didn't. Your cult just made that up. Being that you're kind of stupid even by conservative standards (and that's saying something), you fell for it hard.Why did Michael Mann’s team at Penn State deliberately manipulate the temperature data t show an abrupt spike in their infamous hockey stick graph?
That's not correct. It shows CO2 trailing temps only for a little while. After that, the two move together.So you mean the Vostok ice cores showing CO2 trailing temperature for 450,000 consecutive years mean CO2 is also a product of global warming too, right?
I answered that question for you here:
Congressman LaMalfa stumps entire panel with climate questions
Too late to do anything now except clean up after each natural disaster. $$$$$$$$$ that's been done for over a million years. right?
Needless to say, you ignored my answer. And you were reading the thread, so you saw my response.
I predicted you'd pretend to have not seen the answer, and then you'd keep repeating the same dishonest question. Gutless trolls are predictable that way.
Don’t be a Commie!H2O is a far bigger problem that CO2! Rather than grind US industry to a halt and expend $78 Trillion in the process, a far more economy friendly solution is to take fewer hot showers!
Who is with me on this?
They didn't. Your cult just made that up. Being that you're kind of stupid even by conservative standards (and that's saying something), you fell for it hard.
Generally, "Your side is just lying again" will be the answer to any of your faked questions.
That's not correct. It shows CO2 trailing temps only for a little while. After that, the two move together.
This is basic stuff, and you faceplant at it every time. Given the degree of your ignorance, you shouldn't be bothering the adults.
CO2 lags by 1,000 year on average on BOTH INCREASE AND DECREASE
No, it doesn't say that. You're just a sad cult perv who gets off on lying. That's why you spend your days trolling in a SafeSpace.According to your Failed AGW Theory CO2 rising should NEVER result in falling temperature
Your answer is a pile of garbage summed up with YOU HAVE NO CLUE...
No, you're antisemite filth because you hate Jews. Then, like the bitch you are, you go full metal Nazi and declare that you don't hate Jews, you hate Zionists. You're still antisemite filth.It is Co2, but when Co2 cannot explain it, well, then, you are anti semitic
That's right, kook, Greenland moving a few miles totally changed the climate.Land near the pole theory explains all of climate change.
CO2 lags by 1,000 year on average on BOTH INCREASE AND DECREASE
Run, cult boi, run!
Don't worry. Given your history, everyone expected you to cry and run, so you're not disappointing anyone. And you earned a whole lot of cult brownie points by humiliating yourself on behalf of the cult.
No, you're antisemite filth because you hate Jews. Then, like the bitch you are, you go full metal Nazi and declare that you don't hate Jews, you hate Zionists. You're still antisemite filth.
That's right, kook, Greenland moving a few miles totally changed the climate.
Sweet Jeebus, even by denier standards, you're a dim one.
No, that's not correct. You're just too freakin' stupid to read a graph.
Orbital factors kick off a little warming.
That makes the oceans warmer, so they can hold CO2, so they release more CO2.
That causes the more warming, so more CO2, more warming, more CO2, more warming ... the two move together. CO2 is a forcing and a feedback.
YOur inability to grasp the science does not make the science wrong. It just makes you an imbecile.
No, it doesn't say that. You're just a sad cult perv who gets off on lying. That's why you spend your days trolling in a SafeSpace.
