Has the Bible ever been proven wrong?

[Mr.Conley]

Food for thought:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viMPB_rXZrk[/ame]

 

[LOki]

Food for thought:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viMPB_rXZrk

"Actual Footage"

LOLsome!

It's so unfortunate that folks feel that Bible stories are somehow less valid because they are less than absolutely factual--I think they miss the point.

 

[Mr.Conley]

Proves the Bible wrong though.

 

[LOki]

Proves the Bible wrong though.

I suppose that depends upon what you need it to be right about.

 

[manu1959]

"Actual Footage"

LOLsome!

It's so unfortunate that folks feel that Bible stories are somehow less valid because they are less than absolutely factual--I think they miss the point.

at our church the teach the bible as parables and life leasons....not fact

 

[glockmail]

Proves the Bible wrong though.

Proves a comedy team can BS, that's all.

 

[Mr.Conley]

Prove it.

 

[Mr.Conley]

I suppose that depends upon what you need it to be right about.

Well if the question is "has the Bible EVER been proven wrong?" I think we can hang the mission accomplished banner.

 

[Bullypulpit]

What's amusing about this whole debate is that the Bible is allegory. To take it literally is to miss its point entirely.

 

[dilloduck]

What's amusing about this whole debate is that the Bible is allegory. To take it literally is to miss its point entirely.

You're really not going to claim that there are no historical facts in the Bible, are you?

 

[Bullypulpit]

You're really not going to claim that there are no historical facts in the Bible, are you?

Not at all. But we must see the religious teachings contained therein within their historical context and for the allegory which they are.

 

[dilloduck]

Not at all. But we must see the religious teachings contained therein within their historical context and for the allegory which they are.

"Thou shalt not kill" seems pretty straight foreward

 

[glockmail]

Well if the question is "has the Bible EVER been proven wrong?" I think we can hang the mission accomplished banner.

You sound just like Al Gore and hid global warming campaign: "The argument is over". Meanwhile everone else is laughing.

 

[LOki]

Food for thought:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viMPB_rXZrk

"Actual Footage"

LOLsome!

It's so unfortunate that folks feel that Bible stories are somehow less valid because they are less than absolutely factual--I think they miss the point.

Proves the Bible wrong though.

I suppose that depends upon what you need it to be right about.

Well if the question is "has the Bible EVER been proven wrong?" I think we can hang the mission accomplished banner.

Ever been wrong about "what?" is my question.

If you say "Universal Flood," I'll just say, "So what? That's not what it needs to be right about", and your "mission" becomes pointless.

 

[Mr.Conley]

Ever been wrong about "what?" is my question.

If you say "Universal Flood," I'll just say, "So what? That's not what it needs to be right about", and your "mission" becomes pointless.

How about "The Supposed Infallability of God's Word in the Bible."

 

[Mr.Conley]

You sound just like Al Gore and hid global warming campaign: "The argument is over". Meanwhile everone else is laughing.

I'm still waiting for you to, I don't know, actually discredit anything they or I said.

You can say they're wrong all you want, that doesn't make it wrong. Prove them wrong.

 

[glockmail]

I'm still waiting for you to, I don't know, actually discredit anything they or I said.

You can say they're wrong all you want, that doesn't make it wrong. Prove them wrong.

That's not the point of this thread. The burden is one you atheists.

 

[Mr.Conley]

Thats' what the video does:
Explain the Genesis contradiction

Explain the feasability of the Flood and the Ark

Oh, here's a simple one: if the Bible is inerrant, then why does it give a value for pi (3.14159...) that, screw correctness, isn't even an approximation?

 

[LOki]

How about "The Supposed Infallability of God's Word in the Bible."

I think you'll have to first establish which part of the bible are "God's Words" and not a man's words inspired by God, and then demonstrate (in only those cases where we are discussing God's Words) that there is proof of error.

 

[MissileMan]

I think you'll have to first establish which part of the bible are "God's Words" and not a man's words inspired by God

There is absolutely no way of determining the difference.