skye
Diamond Member
- Oct 19, 2012
- 62,154
- 61,225
- 3,635
Well, if that's true (though this is a rather partisan website) then I would be against that aspect of the bill. I don't think that should be covered.
Nothing should be covered except for what you want covered.
I agree about gender reassignment but not about women's preventative care. That is very important, and it WILL actually save you and I money in the long run, I think. The goal is less unwanted pregnancies, less abortions, less children who become wards of the state, which is VERY expensive. Much, much more expensive than any birth control.
So you're a libertarian, except when it isn't convenient? Is that what you're saying? Read the party platform and see if you agree with that. I guarantee you that you don't.
don;t waste your time,,,
lonely woman ...poster of the month...what do you expect?
no Einstein there
Agreed. I think I'm going to bed.
Yes
sleept tight!