Procrustes Stretched
Dante's Manifesto
- Banned
- #21
"Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown." - from the article
Say it aint so
Oh Hillary! Oh No!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown." - from the article
Zander pulled some useful info up in another thread:what has been done under Obama and Hillary is criminal. the middle east is exploding all around us, they are in bed with Russia evidently and Iran.
remember when Obama was caught off mic telling Russia: he'll have more flexibility when he RE-ELECTED?
what they are bringing down us we have yet to see
and yet people are still wanting to vote for her
OMG frikken criminal flexibility exploding raison oats okra chocolate chip pot wood shavings trailer court cookies dumb dumb dumb dumb demcraot voters deer leeder aaaaarrrrgh!!!!!!
Now, to the worthless OP title:
NY Times: Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians pressed for control of uranium company
And when did Hillary Clinton receive this money personally? Hmmm?
The money went to the Clinton Foundation that has an inordinate number of Clinton suckups on high salaries and pays for private air travel for them, both Clintons, 5 star hotels, etc, etc.
Who knew that the New York Times was part of the 'Vast Right Wing Conspiracy'!
Well, as soon as you can show me the disbursements listing, I would love to look at that!!!
seriously boe? You want me to think of you as an adult with that kind of childish peanut gallery response... and a lie no less?How does Hillary and Bill make money off of Donations to a Non profit Charity?
The $290M that's classified as other out of the $500M the foundation collected in 2009-2012. What's that spent on? Then there is the $25M on travel for the trips when Bubba wasn't jet setting with a pedophile to an orgy island. The Clinton Foundation is not a charity. It spends 15% on "programs" with the rest used to support their permanent campaign staff organization and to fund their lavish lifestyles on TAX FREE donations.
Did you fact check and review what this person/this author is ''claiming'' on the 15%?
The data comes from IRS filings and audited financials. Here are the links -
2008- https://www.clintonfoundation.org/files/2008_audited_financials.pdf
2009- https://www.clintonfoundation.org/files/cf_audited_financials_2008-2009.pdf
2010 - http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2010/311/580/2010-311580204-07ca817f-9.pdf
2011 -http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2011/311/580/2011-311580204-08d3f620-9.pdf
2012- http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2012/311/580/2012-311580204-09d3e966-9.pdf
The Clinton's define "sleazy".
I thought the media was supposed to backing the Clintons?what has been done under Obama and Hillary is criminal. the middle east is exploding all around us, they are in bed with Russia evidently and Iran.
remember when Obama was caught off mic telling Russia: he'll have more flexibility when he RE-ELECTED?
what they are bringing down us we have yet to see
and yet people are still wanting to vote for her
OMG frikken criminal flexibility exploding raison oats okra chocolate chip pot wood shavings trailer court cookies dumb dumb dumb dumb demcraot voters deer leeder aaaaarrrrgh!!!!!!
Now, to the worthless OP title:
NY Times: Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians pressed for control of uranium company
And when did Hillary Clinton receive this money personally? Hmmm?
The money went to the Clinton Foundation that has an inordinate number of Clinton suckups on high salaries and pays for private air travel for them, both Clintons, 5 star hotels, etc, etc.
Who knew that the New York Times was part of the 'Vast Right Wing Conspiracy'!
And apparently this is just the tip of the iceberg according to Bret Baier.I just ran across this. I haven't watched it yet, but you can see at the site
SNIP:
MUST WATCH: Fox News explains how Bill Clinton and Kazakhstan fits into uranium sale to Russians
Posted by The Right Scoop on Apr 23, 2015 at 11:14 AM in Politics | 19 Comments
By The Right Scoop
MUST WATCH: Fox News explains how Bill Clinton and Kazakhstan fits into uranium sale to Russians
And apparently this is just the tip of the iceberg according to Bret Baier.
Watch: at the site
Read more: MUST WATCH Fox News explains how Bill Clinton and Kazakhstan fits into uranium sale to Russians The Right Scoop -
OMFG!
Zander pulled some useful info up in another thread:what has been done under Obama and Hillary is criminal. the middle east is exploding all around us, they are in bed with Russia evidently and Iran.
remember when Obama was caught off mic telling Russia: he'll have more flexibility when he RE-ELECTED?
what they are bringing down us we have yet to see
and yet people are still wanting to vote for her
OMG frikken criminal flexibility exploding raison oats okra chocolate chip pot wood shavings trailer court cookies dumb dumb dumb dumb demcraot voters deer leeder aaaaarrrrgh!!!!!!
Now, to the worthless OP title:
NY Times: Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians pressed for control of uranium company
And when did Hillary Clinton receive this money personally? Hmmm?
The money went to the Clinton Foundation that has an inordinate number of Clinton suckups on high salaries and pays for private air travel for them, both Clintons, 5 star hotels, etc, etc.
Who knew that the New York Times was part of the 'Vast Right Wing Conspiracy'!
Well, as soon as you can show me the disbursements listing, I would love to look at that!!!
seriously boe? You want me to think of you as an adult with that kind of childish peanut gallery response... and a lie no less?How does Hillary and Bill make money off of Donations to a Non profit Charity?
The $290M that's classified as other out of the $500M the foundation collected in 2009-2012. What's that spent on? Then there is the $25M on travel for the trips when Bubba wasn't jet setting with a pedophile to an orgy island. The Clinton Foundation is not a charity. It spends 15% on "programs" with the rest used to support their permanent campaign staff organization and to fund their lavish lifestyles on TAX FREE donations.
Did you fact check and review what this person/this author is ''claiming'' on the 15%?
The data comes from IRS filings and audited financials. Here are the links -
2008- https://www.clintonfoundation.org/files/2008_audited_financials.pdf
2009- https://www.clintonfoundation.org/files/cf_audited_financials_2008-2009.pdf
2010 - http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2010/311/580/2010-311580204-07ca817f-9.pdf
2011 -http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2011/311/580/2011-311580204-08d3f620-9.pdf
2012- http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2012/311/580/2012-311580204-09d3e966-9.pdf
The Clinton's define "sleazy".
You have an awesome signature.We need to have Hildebeast testify during congressional hearings about this.
Did you notice this all took place in 2005?
Who was President and who was SecState in 2005?
Say it ain't so!
Did you notice this all took place in 2005?
Who was President and who was SecState in 2005?
Is that a you don’t care about political families taking money from foreign interests and then not claiming them?Hilarious, NY Times still attacking Clintons and promoting Pocahontas.
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians Pressed for Control of Uranium Company
By JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIREAPRIL 23, 2015
The headline in Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when the newspaper served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
----------------------------------------------
Do not worry, the clintons will continue to call this a "right wing conspiracy" even though it is the left that is putting out the information. Much like the emails scandals.
The left, of course ignore the facts like they always do.
Fucking disgraces. All of them. Especially their moron voters.![]()
I find that VERY circumspect.
The donations and wheeling and dealing began on Bush's watch. The final acquisition of UraniumOne did not happen until a couple years ago, and would have had to be approved by Secretary Clinton, among others.Say it ain't so!
Did you notice this all took place in 2005?
Who was President and who was SecState in 2005?
![]()
That is what should be done. You want to take a guess on what will actually happen though?The donations and wheeling and dealing began on Bush's watch. The final acquisition of UraniumOne did not happen until a couple years ago, and would have had to be approved by Secretary Clinton, among others.Say it ain't so!
Did you notice this all took place in 2005?
Who was President and who was SecState in 2005?
![]()
I would suggest the financial situation of all those involved in the approval process be closely examined.
This uranium story needs to be aggressively pursued. This may finally be the wolf the Right has been screaming about all too often.
If the Russians have managed to buy a Canadian uranium company which in turn controls a significant portion of uranium produced in the United States, and Bill and Hillary aided and abetted that deal in exchange for cash, then they need to be destroyed.
This reminds me of something Joseph Stalin said. "When we hang the capitalists they will sell us the rope we use."
The donations and wheeling and dealing began on Bush's watch. The final acquisition of UraniumOne did not happen until a couple years ago, and would have had to be approved by Secretary Clinton, among others.Say it ain't so!
Did you notice this all took place in 2005?
Who was President and who was SecState in 2005?
![]()
I would suggest the financial situation of all those involved in the approval process be closely examined.