Here Come Trump's Judges

[martybegan]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

 

[depotoo]

Coming from the Washington Post it kinda worries me. Lol

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

 

[martybegan]

Coming from the Washington Post it kinda worries me. Lol

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

its actually from the old "Volokh Conspiracy" blog part of the Washington post. These guys bend libertarian/strict constructionist.

 

[depotoo]

Well that helps ease my mind. Thank you.

Coming from the Washington Post it kinda worries me. Lol

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

its actually from the old "Volokh Conspiracy" blog part of the Washington post. These guys bend libertarian/strict constructionist.

 

[JakeStarkey]

oh, vey

 

[martybegan]

oh, vey

it's actually "Oy vey"

Get it right.

 

[JakeStarkey]

oh, vey

it's actually "Oy vey"

Get it right.

I was being half Jewish.

 

[Care4all]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

 

[JakeStarkey]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

wanna bet?

 

[martybegan]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

What is that supposed to mean?

 

[koshergrl]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

What is that supposed to mean?

she doesn't know, she's just repeating commie mantra.

 

[yiostheoy]

The GOP has 2 years to fill numerous court vacancies while they can.

Harry Reid did the same thing and also clipped the filibuster rules of the Senate to do so.

This has given the GOP much power now to influence judicial appointments in a tit for tat sequence.

What goes around comes around.

 

[yiostheoy]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

Pretty much, yes. That's because a corporation has the same rights as an individual.

A corporation is a synthetic person created for doing business.

 

[yiostheoy]

oh, vey

it's actually "Oy vey"

Get it right.

Yiddish right ?!

 

[Care4all]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

What is that supposed to mean?

when you looked at Gorsuch's decisions, he tended to side with corporation's rights OVER individual citizens....

are the judicial picks more likely to favor big business and corporations in their decisions?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Will they be impeached when Trump is found guilty of treason?

 

[yiostheoy]

Will they be impeached when Trump is found guilty of treason?

There is no evidence of any crimes by DJ Trump yet.

So don't hold your breath.

I know lots of people who are holding their breath and turning blue.

 

[martybegan]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

What is that supposed to mean?

when you looked at Gorsuch's decisions, he tended to side with corporation's rights OVER individual citizens....

are the judicial picks more likely to favor big business and corporations in their decisions?

It depends on what is the topic, and what is exactly being decided on. If you are referring to Hobby Lobby, that is more about an owner of a company being able to decide how to run their company.

 

[martybegan]

Will they be impeached when Trump is found guilty of treason?

Right around the same time you win your Nobel Prize.

 

[Care4all]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

Pretty much, yes. That's because a corporation has the same rights as an individual.

A corporation is a synthetic person created for doing business.

no it's not and people who think it is are wrong imo.

Corporations when first even allowed to be created were not even allowed to talk or speak or donate to or endorse any political stance or candidate....if they did, then they lost their corporation status....