NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2009
- 117,063
- 13,888
The Benghazi 'nuts are now, officially, at 653 pm on November 1st,
crazier than the birthers.
crazier than the birthers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Our Messiah is about to kick your elitist, out of touch millionaire Mormon's coon dawg ass come next week......take that to the bank.
Your Messiah is about to be kicked to the curb like the cheap $2 whore that he is...
I'll tell you what a whore is......a multi millionaire who buys into failing companies with other people's money, engineers layoffs, loss of pensions, healthcare, benefits etc. then banks tens of millions of dollars when the company relocates to another country and hires day laborers for $10 a day.
Sound like any millionaire mormon you know??
Your Messiah is about to be kicked to the curb like the cheap $2 whore that he is...
I'll tell you what a whore is......a multi millionaire who buys into failing companies with other people's money, engineers layoffs, loss of pensions, healthcare, benefits etc. then banks tens of millions of dollars when the company relocates to another country and hires day laborers for $10 a day.
Sound like any millionaire mormon you know??
Sounds like Barry and GM to me... Ask the non-union folks at Delphi...
I'll tell you what a whore is......a multi millionaire who buys into failing companies with other people's money, engineers layoffs, loss of pensions, healthcare, benefits etc. then banks tens of millions of dollars when the company relocates to another country and hires day laborers for $10 a day.
Sound like any millionaire mormon you know??
Sounds like Barry and GM to me... Ask the non-union folks at Delphi...
You've got your head so far up your right wing ass you'll never smell fresh air again. Romney is worth a quarter billion dollars and a few years ago Obama was paying back his student loans...though it's the way You, Fox News, Ann Coulter and Lush Rambo think.
Anyone got a suggestion on why Romney took a complete pass on the Benghazi question during the last debate?
They can try to make hay with that issue, but the only people who are paying attention are right wing tools.
Anyone got a suggestion on why Romney took a complete pass on the Benghazi question during the last debate?
He didn't want to be accused of exploiting the tragedy for political gain which the left surly would have done and people are focused more on the economy. In any event some the mainstream media are starting to ask more questions about Benghazi so reelected or not Obama will have to deal with this.
So I guess that little fact of Al Qaeda taking responsibility for the Benghazi attacks mere hours after it happened should be dismissed as pesky little details that don't fit your argument.
Buy it or don't being portrayed as someone trying to exploit a tragedy for political gain in a close election can cost you the election that was a risk Romney decided not to take in my view.Anyone got a suggestion on why Romney took a complete pass on the Benghazi question during the last debate?
He didn't want to be accused of exploiting the tragedy for political gain which the left surly would have done and people are focused more on the economy. In any event some the mainstream media are starting to ask more questions about Benghazi so reelected or not Obama will have to deal with this.
So Romney did not bring up the 'facts' because he was afraid of being attacked from the left? You realize that makes absolutely no sense. If the President was in such negligence would that be something Romney could use to show he would be a better president? Yet he took a pass. Sorry, just not buying it.
So I guess that little fact of Al Qaeda taking responsibility for the Benghazi attacks mere hours after it happened should be dismissed as pesky little details that don't fit your argument.
They totally didn't, and it wasn't even Al Qaeda that supposedly took credit. Those guys you're talking about actually said they didn't take part like 24 hours later. Also don't think he's post mentioned terrorist groups or not.
Buy it or don't being portrayed as someone trying to exploit a tragedy for political gain in a close election can cost you the election that was a risk Romney decided not to take in my view.He didn't want to be accused of exploiting the tragedy for political gain which the left surly would have done and people are focused more on the economy. In any event some the mainstream media are starting to ask more questions about Benghazi so reelected or not Obama will have to deal with this.
So Romney did not bring up the 'facts' because he was afraid of being attacked from the left? You realize that makes absolutely no sense. If the President was in such negligence would that be something Romney could use to show he would be a better president? Yet he took a pass. Sorry, just not buying it.