High Crimes and Misdemeanors

[Wry Catcher]

Hillary lied to the FBI and Congress and destroyed public property.

Next

She was not indicted, not convicted and thus is not a crook. Trump is not prosecutor, nor judge nor jury. Trump fooled the fools and it appears he fooled you too.

The law you quoted deals with extortion, not libel or slander. You highlighted a portion of the law, but you failed to highlight the part that defines intent. Had you done so you would have known that Trump did not commit a felony under the quoted statute when he accused Clinton of being dishonest. I will restate the law you cited (which is a Florida Statute) and will highlight the part you ignored:

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

This law makes it illegal to accuse someone of a crime or offense with the intent to extort money or get the person to act in a certain way. Intent is an essential element of the crime. All Trump did was publicly accuse Hillary of dishonesty. He did not threaten to expose her if she didn't give him money or special favors. Falsely accusing someone of dishonesty would be classified is either libel or slander depending on whether the accusations were written or spoken; however, truth is an absolute defense to these charges and the evidence that Hillary repeatedly lied is overwhelming. The fact she was not convicted is irrelevant.

Conclusion: trump did not violate the Florida Statue which prohibits what is commonly referred to as blackmail.

Note: When it comes to libel or slander, truth is an absolute defense. But when it comes to blackmail, truth is not necessarily a defense. It is a crime to threaten to expose a persons secrets for the purpose of extortion. My advice: (1) always tell the truth and you will never have to worry about being charged with libel or slander; and (2) never threaten to defame someone unless they pay you off.

I could make an argument that Trump's action were culpable if I put in the time to research the law in other states, or in the common law***; however, your point is valid and I agree with your conclusion.

That said, Trump who repeated this accusation lacking evidence is morally culpable, as there is no probative evidence attached to his accusations; it is in fact nothing more than a Big Lie, without substantive proof (i.e. an indictment with a conviction after trial) it is defamation and a civil tort.

***See for example,

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/2/pdfs/ukpga_19830002_en.pdf

with attention to 106, to wit: "False statements as to candidates".

Such a law would seems to be necessary given the current state of affairs in our country.

 

[Windship]

""MELBOURNE, Fla. — After refraining from calling Hillary Clinton names at the first presidential debate on Monday night, Donald Trump took the stage at a rally in an airplane hangar here on Tuesday night and declared: "Almost every single poll had us winning the debate against 'Crooked Hillary Clinton' big league. Big league. She is as crooked as they come.""
At Florida rally, Trump resumes attacking ‘Crooked Hillary Clinton’

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 42, sub-ch. 3, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2420; GS 3261; RGS 5092; CGL 7194; s. 1, ch. 57-254; s. 991, ch. 71-136; s. 1307, ch. 97-102.
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine

Food for thought!

Your as bad as the hellery sheep crying about trumps win. Why not you just shut the fuck up you shill. And why dont you watch trump using this widowed Navy Seal wife as a prop for trumps military build up. Op, Your a piece of dirt. This is just miserable.

 

[Skull Pilot]

sounds like more schoolyard whining to me

 

[Windship]

...you dont give a fuck about about high crimes and misdemeanors.

 

[Wry Catcher]

""MELBOURNE, Fla. — After refraining from calling Hillary Clinton names at the first presidential debate on Monday night, Donald Trump took the stage at a rally in an airplane hangar here on Tuesday night and declared: "Almost every single poll had us winning the debate against 'Crooked Hillary Clinton' big league. Big league. She is as crooked as they come.""
At Florida rally, Trump resumes attacking ‘Crooked Hillary Clinton’

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 42, sub-ch. 3, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2420; GS 3261; RGS 5092; CGL 7194; s. 1, ch. 57-254; s. 991, ch. 71-136; s. 1307, ch. 97-102.
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine

Food for thought!

Your as bad as the hellery sheep crying about trumps win. Why not you just shut the fuck up you shill. And why dont you watch trump using this widowed Navy Seal wife as a prop for trumps military build up. Op, Your a piece of dirt. This is just miserable.

To quote Dick Cheney, the former Vice President of the United States, "go fuck yourself".

 

[Avatar4321]

Hillary lied to the FBI and Congress and destroyed public property.

Next

She was not indicted, not convicted and thus is not a crook. Trump is not prosecutor, nor judge nor jury. Trump fooled the fools and it appears he fooled you too.

The law you quoted deals with extortion, not libel or slander. You highlighted a portion of the law, but you failed to highlight the part that defines intent. Had you done so you would have known that Trump did not commit a felony under the quoted statute when he accused Clinton of being dishonest. I will restate the law you cited (which is a Florida Statute) and will highlight the part you ignored:

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

This law makes it illegal to accuse someone of a crime or offense with the intent to extort money or get the person to act in a certain way. Intent is an essential element of the crime. All Trump did was publicly accuse Hillary of dishonesty. He did not threaten to expose her if she didn't give him money or special favors. Falsely accusing someone of dishonesty would be classified is either libel or slander depending on whether the accusations were written or spoken; however, truth is an absolute defense to these charges and the evidence that Hillary repeatedly lied is overwhelming. The fact she was not convicted is irrelevant.

Conclusion: trump did not violate the Florida Statue which prohibits what is commonly referred to as blackmail.

Note: When it comes to libel or slander, truth is an absolute defense. But when it comes to blackmail, truth is not necessarily a defense. It is a crime to threaten to expose a persons secrets for the purpose of extortion. My advice: (1) always tell the truth and you will never have to worry about being charged with libel or slander; and (2) never threaten to defame someone unless they pay you off.

I could make an argument that Trump's action were culpable if I put in the time to research the law in other states, or in the common law***; however, your point is valid and I agree with your conclusion.

That said, Trump who repeated this accusation lacking evidence is morally culpable, as there is no probative evidence attached to his accusations; it is in fact nothing more than a Big Lie, without substantive proof (i.e. an indictment with a conviction after trial) it is defamation and a civil tort.

***See for example,

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/2/pdfs/ukpga_19830002_en.pdf

with attention to 106, to wit: "False statements as to candidates".

Such a law would seems to be necessary given the current state of affairs in our country.

No self respecting individual would accept any analysis you produced on the law after that sloppy op absent you going to law school and educating yourself first. You seriously tried to argue that trump is guilty of extortion for calling Hillary crooked. Nevermind that she is crooked.

And you think you could scour the law and find something that works and anyone would take that claim seriously?

Oh and democrats would never adopt that UK law. They'd all be in jail within a year.

 

[Dragonlady]

Hillary lied to the FBI and Congress and destroyed public property.

Next

She was not indicted, not convicted and thus is not a crook. Trump is not prosecutor, nor judge nor jury. Trump fooled the fools and it appears he fooled you too.

Yet. She may still go Scott-free. However, she will end up the epicenter of Watergate and Watergate II if not ever tried and convicted.

One word: Karma.

Karma is what is happening to Trump right now. The man is losing his shit on a regular basis.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Hillary lied to the FBI and Congress and destroyed public property.

Next

She was not indicted, not convicted and thus is not a crook. Trump is not prosecutor, nor judge nor jury. Trump fooled the fools and it appears he fooled you too.

Yet. She may still go Scott-free. However, she will end up the epicenter of Watergate and Watergate II if not ever tried and convicted.

One word: Karma.

Karma is what is happening to Trump right now. The man is losing his shit on a regular basis.

It applies equally to everybody, indeed it does.

 

[Avatar4321]

""MELBOURNE, Fla. — After refraining from calling Hillary Clinton names at the first presidential debate on Monday night, Donald Trump took the stage at a rally in an airplane hangar here on Tuesday night and declared: "Almost every single poll had us winning the debate against 'Crooked Hillary Clinton' big league. Big league. She is as crooked as they come.""
At Florida rally, Trump resumes attacking ‘Crooked Hillary Clinton’

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 42, sub-ch. 3, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2420; GS 3261; RGS 5092; CGL 7194; s. 1, ch. 57-254; s. 991, ch. 71-136; s. 1307, ch. 97-102.
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine

Food for thought!

Your as bad as the hellery sheep crying about trumps win. Why not you just shut the fuck up you shill. And why dont you watch trump using this widowed Navy Seal wife as a prop for trumps military build up. Op, Your a piece of dirt. This is just miserable.

To quote Dick Cheney, the former Vice President of the United States, "go fuck yourself".

Then stop commiting extortion. By your logic you should be in jail for falsely accusing trump of a crime.

But then you don't really care that trump has not committed a crime. You just want grounds to impeach him. Why? You are getting many policies you claim to love.

Solely because he has an R.

Pathetic

 

[Avatar4321]

Hillary lied to the FBI and Congress and destroyed public property.

Next

She was not indicted, not convicted and thus is not a crook. Trump is not prosecutor, nor judge nor jury. Trump fooled the fools and it appears he fooled you too.

Yet. She may still go Scott-free. However, she will end up the epicenter of Watergate and Watergate II if not ever tried and convicted.

One word: Karma.

Karma is what is happening to Trump right now. The man is losing his shit on a regular basis.

Really? Cause the guy is rich, has a beautiful wife and family, just became president of the united states and his political enemies have gone insane. If this is karma for his "bad" behavior, then karma is screwed up

 

[Wry Catcher]

Hillary lied to the FBI and Congress and destroyed public property.

Next

She was not indicted, not convicted and thus is not a crook. Trump is not prosecutor, nor judge nor jury. Trump fooled the fools and it appears he fooled you too.

The law you quoted deals with extortion, not libel or slander. You highlighted a portion of the law, but you failed to highlight the part that defines intent. Had you done so you would have known that Trump did not commit a felony under the quoted statute when he accused Clinton of being dishonest. I will restate the law you cited (which is a Florida Statute) and will highlight the part you ignored:

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

This law makes it illegal to accuse someone of a crime or offense with the intent to extort money or get the person to act in a certain way. Intent is an essential element of the crime. All Trump did was publicly accuse Hillary of dishonesty. He did not threaten to expose her if she didn't give him money or special favors. Falsely accusing someone of dishonesty would be classified is either libel or slander depending on whether the accusations were written or spoken; however, truth is an absolute defense to these charges and the evidence that Hillary repeatedly lied is overwhelming. The fact she was not convicted is irrelevant.

Conclusion: trump did not violate the Florida Statue which prohibits what is commonly referred to as blackmail.

Note: When it comes to libel or slander, truth is an absolute defense. But when it comes to blackmail, truth is not necessarily a defense. It is a crime to threaten to expose a persons secrets for the purpose of extortion. My advice: (1) always tell the truth and you will never have to worry about being charged with libel or slander; and (2) never threaten to defame someone unless they pay you off.

I could make an argument that Trump's action were culpable if I put in the time to research the law in other states, or in the common law***; however, your point is valid and I agree with your conclusion.

That said, Trump who repeated this accusation lacking evidence is morally culpable, as there is no probative evidence attached to his accusations; it is in fact nothing more than a Big Lie, without substantive proof (i.e. an indictment with a conviction after trial) it is defamation and a civil tort.

***See for example,

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/2/pdfs/ukpga_19830002_en.pdf

with attention to 106, to wit: "False statements as to candidates".

Such a law would seems to be necessary given the current state of affairs in our country.

No self respecting individual would accept any analysis you produced on the law after that sloppy op absent you going to law school and educating yourself first. You seriously tried to argue that trump is guilty of extortion for calling Hillary crooked. Nevermind that she is crooked.

And you think you could scour the law and find something that works and anyone would take that claim seriously?

Oh and democrats would never adopt that UK law. They'd all be in jail within a year.

Thank you for echoing the opinion of The Professor, while not thinking, per se, it is an example of plagiarism.

That said, defamation without truth as a defense is wrong, and should be punished. Thinking people will respond rationally, you respond emotionally and that's okay, thinking can be very difficult for people like you.

 

[Avatar4321]

Hillary lied to the FBI and Congress and destroyed public property.

Next

She was not indicted, not convicted and thus is not a crook. Trump is not prosecutor, nor judge nor jury. Trump fooled the fools and it appears he fooled you too.

The law you quoted deals with extortion, not libel or slander. You highlighted a portion of the law, but you failed to highlight the part that defines intent. Had you done so you would have known that Trump did not commit a felony under the quoted statute when he accused Clinton of being dishonest. I will restate the law you cited (which is a Florida Statute) and will highlight the part you ignored:

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

This law makes it illegal to accuse someone of a crime or offense with the intent to extort money or get the person to act in a certain way. Intent is an essential element of the crime. All Trump did was publicly accuse Hillary of dishonesty. He did not threaten to expose her if she didn't give him money or special favors. Falsely accusing someone of dishonesty would be classified is either libel or slander depending on whether the accusations were written or spoken; however, truth is an absolute defense to these charges and the evidence that Hillary repeatedly lied is overwhelming. The fact she was not convicted is irrelevant.

Conclusion: trump did not violate the Florida Statue which prohibits what is commonly referred to as blackmail.

Note: When it comes to libel or slander, truth is an absolute defense. But when it comes to blackmail, truth is not necessarily a defense. It is a crime to threaten to expose a persons secrets for the purpose of extortion. My advice: (1) always tell the truth and you will never have to worry about being charged with libel or slander; and (2) never threaten to defame someone unless they pay you off.

I don't think the elements matter to him.

Nothing you've posted which I've read suggest you think.

Why would it? That would require you to actually read what I wrote and understand it.

Yet as foolish as I am I was able to read the statute, see that it was absolutely absurd for you to claim that trump calling Hillary crooked violated an extortion law, and see that you unwittingly violated the fake law you accused trump of doing.

So if I'm a fool who can't think, what the heck does that make you?

 

[Avatar4321]

Hillary lied to the FBI and Congress and destroyed public property.

Next

She was not indicted, not convicted and thus is not a crook. Trump is not prosecutor, nor judge nor jury. Trump fooled the fools and it appears he fooled you too.

The law you quoted deals with extortion, not libel or slander. You highlighted a portion of the law, but you failed to highlight the part that defines intent. Had you done so you would have known that Trump did not commit a felony under the quoted statute when he accused Clinton of being dishonest. I will restate the law you cited (which is a Florida Statute) and will highlight the part you ignored:

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

This law makes it illegal to accuse someone of a crime or offense with the intent to extort money or get the person to act in a certain way. Intent is an essential element of the crime. All Trump did was publicly accuse Hillary of dishonesty. He did not threaten to expose her if she didn't give him money or special favors. Falsely accusing someone of dishonesty would be classified is either libel or slander depending on whether the accusations were written or spoken; however, truth is an absolute defense to these charges and the evidence that Hillary repeatedly lied is overwhelming. The fact she was not convicted is irrelevant.

Conclusion: trump did not violate the Florida Statue which prohibits what is commonly referred to as blackmail.

Note: When it comes to libel or slander, truth is an absolute defense. But when it comes to blackmail, truth is not necessarily a defense. It is a crime to threaten to expose a persons secrets for the purpose of extortion. My advice: (1) always tell the truth and you will never have to worry about being charged with libel or slander; and (2) never threaten to defame someone unless they pay you off.

I could make an argument that Trump's action were culpable if I put in the time to research the law in other states, or in the common law***; however, your point is valid and I agree with your conclusion.

That said, Trump who repeated this accusation lacking evidence is morally culpable, as there is no probative evidence attached to his accusations; it is in fact nothing more than a Big Lie, without substantive proof (i.e. an indictment with a conviction after trial) it is defamation and a civil tort.

***See for example,

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/2/pdfs/ukpga_19830002_en.pdf

with attention to 106, to wit: "False statements as to candidates".

Such a law would seems to be necessary given the current state of affairs in our country.

No self respecting individual would accept any analysis you produced on the law after that sloppy op absent you going to law school and educating yourself first. You seriously tried to argue that trump is guilty of extortion for calling Hillary crooked. Nevermind that she is crooked.

And you think you could scour the law and find something that works and anyone would take that claim seriously?

Oh and democrats would never adopt that UK law. They'd all be in jail within a year.

Thank you for echoing the opinion of The Professor, while not thinking, per se, it is an example of plagiarism.

That said, defamation without truth as a defense is wrong, and should be punished. Thinking people will respond rationally, you respond emotionally and that's okay, thinking can be very difficult for people like you.

I responded before the professor

Defamation is a civil, not a criminal matter. And trump actually has truth here for a defense

 

[Windship]

""MELBOURNE, Fla. — After refraining from calling Hillary Clinton names at the first presidential debate on Monday night, Donald Trump took the stage at a rally in an airplane hangar here on Tuesday night and declared: "Almost every single poll had us winning the debate against 'Crooked Hillary Clinton' big league. Big league. She is as crooked as they come.""
At Florida rally, Trump resumes attacking ‘Crooked Hillary Clinton’

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 42, sub-ch. 3, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2420; GS 3261; RGS 5092; CGL 7194; s. 1, ch. 57-254; s. 991, ch. 71-136; s. 1307, ch. 97-102.
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine

Food for thought!

Your as bad as the hellery sheep crying about trumps win. Why not you just shut the fuck up you shill. And why dont you watch trump using this widowed Navy Seal wife as a prop for trumps military build up. Op, Your a piece of dirt. This is just miserable.

To quote Dick Cheney, the former Vice President of the United States, "go fuck yourself".

You first.

 

[Avatar4321]

""MELBOURNE, Fla. — After refraining from calling Hillary Clinton names at the first presidential debate on Monday night, Donald Trump took the stage at a rally in an airplane hangar here on Tuesday night and declared: "Almost every single poll had us winning the debate against 'Crooked Hillary Clinton' big league. Big league. She is as crooked as they come.""
At Florida rally, Trump resumes attacking ‘Crooked Hillary Clinton’

"836.05 Threats; extortion.—Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 42, sub-ch. 3, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2420; GS 3261; RGS 5092; CGL 7194; s. 1, ch. 57-254; s. 991, ch. 71-136; s. 1307, ch. 97-102.
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine

Food for thought!

Your as bad as the hellery sheep crying about trumps win. Why not you just shut the fuck up you shill. And why dont you watch trump using this widowed Navy Seal wife as a prop for trumps military build up. Op, Your a piece of dirt. This is just miserable.

To quote Dick Cheney, the former Vice President of the United States, "go fuck yourself".

Then stop commiting extortion. By your logic you should be in jail for falsely accusing trump of a crime.

But then you don't really care that trump has not committed a crime. You just want grounds to impeach him. Why? You are getting many policies you claim to love.

Solely because he has an R.

Pathetic

You sign you posts, "Pathetic"? Maybe you have some ability to see yourself, I couldn't think of a better description for someone like you.

Really? What posts did I sign pathetic?

What I've called pathetic is trying to trump up charges because someone who agrees with you on alot doesn't have the right letter next to their name.

Not surprisingly you didn't understand

 

[Avatar4321]

Your as bad as the hellery sheep crying about trumps win. Why not you just shut the fuck up you shill. And why dont you watch trump using this widowed Navy Seal wife as a prop for trumps military build up. Op, Your a piece of dirt. This is just miserable.

To quote Dick Cheney, the former Vice President of the United States, "go fuck yourself".

Then stop commiting extortion. By your logic you should be in jail for falsely accusing trump of a crime.

But then you don't really care that trump has not committed a crime. You just want grounds to impeach him. Why? You are getting many policies you claim to love.

Solely because he has an R.

Pathetic

You sign you posts, "Pathetic"? Maybe you have some ability to see yourself, I couldn't think of a better description for someone like you.

Really? What posts did I sign pathetic?

What I've called pathetic is trying to trump up charges because someone who agrees with you on alot doesn't have the right letter next to their name.

Not surprisingly you didn't understand

Maybe you are a thinker, a Concrete one.

One day I hope you will learn and feel obligated to do what is right