High school uses loophole for Nativity scene

566dd6431f00002d00e9ba1f.jpg


Drunk Driver Found Hiding In Nativity Scene After Crashing Car, Police Say

Well, that's a good place for drunks and perverts to hide.
 
Then you are a Goddamned fool. it won't happen at that school, by that school, ever again.
Yes it will. Supreme Court Justices Alan Keyes and Sarah Palin will see to it. Our judges will return sanity to American life. And guess what? You'll still be able to live your life as an atheist and you can't force us to be atheists either. That's freedom the Christan founders intended.
 
The kids are the primary part of 'we'.
Nope. They didn't even pay for the fucking thing, they just go there to learn what we teach them.
Brainwashed dupe. We pay for it through taxes.
The adults pay, not the kiddos, and while they do have religious freedom, the school does not, and it is promoting religion, which is illegal here.
No, they're celebrating American culture. Fascists like you want to impose one closeminded view of all things and try to defend that fascism with the constitution.
The public schools are required, by law, to remain religiously neutral like the rest of the state, county, and federal government. Promoting Christianity is not remaining neutral.
Explain how a nativity scene is establishing a religion? That requires action. A nativity is passive like a religious painting in a public museum. Oh? Do you want to burn paintings and the Bible and books about them in our public libraries? Sounds fascist.
 
Ah, loopholes, ain't they grand? I wonder if the little snowflake and father who filed suit stroked out?

Banned live Nativity scene at Indiana high school goes on with mannequins

ELKHART, Ind. (December 13, 2015) — After a federal judge banned Concord High School from performing a live nativity scene at their yearly Christmas Spectacular, the school compromised and used mannequins instead of student actors.

According to FOX28, there was applause at the Concord High performing arts center and some people were even moved to tears when the curtain rose to reveal a static Nativity scene.

The Freedom from Religion Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union sued the school district on behalf of a Concord High School student and his father, arguing that a Nativity scene conveyed an endorsement of religion. And a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction last Wednesday to stop this year’s live scene.

Banned live Nativity scene at Indiana high school goes on with mannequins
And, once again, they need to be sued. Keep your fucking gods out of our secular public schools.

Sounds like these Christians were pretty creative. So shove that up your ass asshole. LOL
 
it is nothing of the kind, and it's not even true. Jesus was born in the spring as far as they can tell.
The season is part of the American/western cultural history aspect. The scene itself is part of a Christian history, a religion history context.

If someone lets a Nativity scene get under their skin they have some deep rooted issues going on
In a Public, you're goddamned right it gets under liberal skin, Keep your fucking gods out of our secular public schools. You have your churches for that bullshit.
Fucking gods? This isn't about islam.
Your God didn't fuck, Mary? Ah, he certainly did, in the body no less according to the Mormons.
The Mormon god is not God. Don't confuse them for Christians. Thanks.
 
Ah, loopholes, ain't they grand? I wonder if the little snowflake and father who filed suit stroked out?

Banned live Nativity scene at Indiana high school goes on with mannequins

ELKHART, Ind. (December 13, 2015) — After a federal judge banned Concord High School from performing a live nativity scene at their yearly Christmas Spectacular, the school compromised and used mannequins instead of student actors.

According to FOX28, there was applause at the Concord High performing arts center and some people were even moved to tears when the curtain rose to reveal a static Nativity scene.

The Freedom from Religion Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union sued the school district on behalf of a Concord High School student and his father, arguing that a Nativity scene conveyed an endorsement of religion. And a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction last Wednesday to stop this year’s live scene.

Banned live Nativity scene at Indiana high school goes on with mannequins
And, once again, they need to be sued. Keep your fucking gods out of our secular public schools.

Sounds like these Christians were pretty creative. So shove that up your ass asshole. LOL
When the judge spanks them tomorrow, do the same, asswipe.
 
Last edited:
No, they do not.
Oh yes they do, dupe. Tell a muslim student to remove her headgear. I dare you, phony.
That is a person, dumbass. The kids have freedom of religion, the school does not.
The school is comprised of kids, moron.
Nope. We own it, and it doesn't not have Freedom of Religion.
go read the bill of rights again.
I have, my people wrote it.
 
In a Public, you're goddamned right it gets under liberal skin, Keep your fucking gods out of our secular public schools. You have your churches for that bullshit.
So, do you consider it a Christmas tree or a holiday tree? Do you say Merry Christmas or happy holidays? Or just humbug?
I don't say any of that fucking nonsense.
That explains plenty. Do you celebrate any holidays?
You mean Holy Days (AKA holiday), no.
So you object to any government-recognized holiday?
Yep.
 
So, do you consider it a Christmas tree or a holiday tree? Do you say Merry Christmas or happy holidays? Or just humbug?
I don't say any of that fucking nonsense.
That explains plenty. Do you celebrate any holidays?
You mean Holy Days (AKA holiday), no.
So you object to any government-recognized holiday?
Yep.
Miserable sod.
 
Nope. They didn't even pay for the fucking thing, they just go there to learn what we teach them.
Brainwashed dupe. We pay for it through taxes.
The adults pay, not the kiddos, and while they do have religious freedom, the school does not, and it is promoting religion, which is illegal here.
No, they're celebrating American culture. Fascists like you want to impose one closeminded view of all things and try to defend that fascism with the constitution.
The public schools are required, by law, to remain religiously neutral like the rest of the state, county, and federal government. Promoting Christianity is not remaining neutral.
Explain how a nativity scene is establishing a religion? That requires action. A nativity is passive like a religious painting in a public museum. Oh? Do you want to burn paintings and the Bible and books about them in our public libraries? Sounds fascist.
The Nativity is a Christian story, that cannot be presented, legally, by a secular public school. Neither can the stories of Moses, or Muhammad.
 
Then you are a Goddamned fool. it won't happen at that school, by that school, ever again.
Yes it will. Supreme Court Justices Alan Keyes and Sarah Palin will see to it. Our judges will return sanity to American life. And guess what? You'll still be able to live your life as an atheist and you can't force us to be atheists either. That's freedom the Christan founders intended.
You're an idiot, beyond question.
 
Brainwashed dupe. We pay for it through taxes.
The adults pay, not the kiddos, and while they do have religious freedom, the school does not, and it is promoting religion, which is illegal here.
No, they're celebrating American culture. Fascists like you want to impose one closeminded view of all things and try to defend that fascism with the constitution.
The public schools are required, by law, to remain religiously neutral like the rest of the state, county, and federal government. Promoting Christianity is not remaining neutral.
Explain how a nativity scene is establishing a religion? That requires action. A nativity is passive like a religious painting in a public museum. Oh? Do you want to burn paintings and the Bible and books about them in our public libraries? Sounds fascist.
The Nativity is a Christian story, that cannot be presented, legally, by a secular public school. Neither can the stories of Moses, or Muhammad.
Until Justice Palin says otherwise.
 
Nope. They didn't even pay for the fucking thing, they just go there to learn what we teach them.
Brainwashed dupe. We pay for it through taxes.
The adults pay, not the kiddos, and while they do have religious freedom, the school does not, and it is promoting religion, which is illegal here.
No, they're celebrating American culture. Fascists like you want to impose one closeminded view of all things and try to defend that fascism with the constitution.
The public schools are required, by law, to remain religiously neutral like the rest of the state, county, and federal government. Promoting Christianity is not remaining neutral.
Explain how a nativity scene is establishing a religion? That requires action. A nativity is passive like a religious painting in a public museum. Oh? Do you want to burn paintings and the Bible and books about them in our public libraries? Sounds fascist.

So, you're saying that Muslims have the same right to place their Islamic religious scenes on U.S. public property? That would also apply to all other religions, right?
 
Brainwashed dupe. We pay for it through taxes.
The adults pay, not the kiddos, and while they do have religious freedom, the school does not, and it is promoting religion, which is illegal here.
No, they're celebrating American culture. Fascists like you want to impose one closeminded view of all things and try to defend that fascism with the constitution.
The public schools are required, by law, to remain religiously neutral like the rest of the state, county, and federal government. Promoting Christianity is not remaining neutral.
Explain how a nativity scene is establishing a religion? That requires action. A nativity is passive like a religious painting in a public museum. Oh? Do you want to burn paintings and the Bible and books about them in our public libraries? Sounds fascist.

So, you're saying that Muslims have the same right to place their Islamic religious scenes on U.S. public property? That would also apply to all other religions, right?
If they want to erect a scene of Mohammed raping a little girl during their Holy Week and they pay for it, I don't have a problem with it. I suspect they won't. Question is are you going to tell them they can't?
 

Forum List

Back
Top