Hillary Admits She Knew She Was Breaking The Law

[easyt65]

Did you know that just by having classified, especially Top Secret Compartmentalized info in her possession, Hillary BROKE THE LAW, Jake? (By the way you completely ignore this fact, like the media, I would say you either did not know it or are trying to avoid it.)

When Clinton left the State Department she was required to hand over all work-related material (which we know she did not do - violation of the FOIA and the Federal Records Act, 2 laws broken). She was 'Read Out' of highly top Secret Compartmentalized Programs, which meant she was debriefed and informed that from that day forward she was not allowed to talk about that program, was not allowed to have access to the program, and was not legally allowed to have in her possession anything about that / those programs. When she walked out the door of the State Department as a CIVILIAN / CITIZEN she was not legally allowed to have ANY classified information in her possession. To have this information in her possession would be ILLEGAL.

She didn't just have 'Classified' information - according to the WH she had in her possession information SO classified that it 'could not be released in ANY format because it would cause GRAVE DAMAGE to our National Security'. The FBI said they found a LOT of freakin' classified on her servers, EACH ONE CARRYING A CRIMINAL CHARGE (if truly held accountable instead of being protected from charges/prosecution). SHE BROKE THE LAEW JUST HAVING CLASSIFIED ON HER SERVERS AND IN HER E-MAILS!

Some one such as yourself who proclaims to be an expert on this Jake ('expert' enough to ignorantly and falsely call someone else a liar) should know all this, Jake....so what is it with YOU? Are you ignorant of all this or are you just PLAYING ignorant in defense of Hillary?

 

[easyt65]

You guys still hung up on e-mails?

Everyone except libs and Hillary, praying this goes away, are. National Security is actually important to everyone else.

This is an excellent point, showing why Hillary in her own way is no more fit for the office than Comrade Trump.

too funny Jake....She isn't fit mentally, physically, emotionally, spiritually, ethically, morally, etc.................................She is a lying criminal...and you like her. What does that say about you?

Neither of them are fit is the point. You show you are a liar. I don't like her, and I support Johnson, as you well know. You are also a hypocrite, because though you are saying you hate HRC's neo-imperialism, we both know that Trump will send more troops overseas.

Let's make it easy for libertarians and those who oppose overseas adventurism: bad = Trump and Clinton. Good = Johnson.

How do you know..."Trump will send more troops overseas?" We certainly know Hillary is a warmonger, because her past years in government prove it. Trump has no such history, so we don't know. You are not only guessing, but assuming he would be worse than Cankles. Now that is dumb Jake.

Trump was against the Iraq War and condemned it harshly in the R debates, making Little Jebby and the RNC squirm. Trump has also stated a willingness to work with Putin. His approach is clearly at odds with NATO, the Oligarchy, the two parties, Pentagon....plus Big Ears and Cankles clearly have no intention of working with Putin. So does Trump deserve any points for this, in your mind?

Hillary condemned Al Qaeida for the 9/11/01 attack on the US.

Hillary argued for the Iraq War.

Hillary VOTED for the Iraq War.

Hillary then condemned the decision to go to war in Iraq.

Hillary's State department was working with Qaddafi who was helping the US fight terrorists in Nrthrn Africa

Hillary then helped Obama ALLY themselves with Al Qaeida

Hillary then helped barry drag the US into their own personal war to help Al Qaeida kill Qaddafi & take over Libya


...damn, Hillary is eligible for the Nobel Peace Prize the day she steps into office, just like Barry.

 

[gipper]

Everyone except libs and Hillary, praying this goes away, are. National Security is actually important to everyone else.

This is an excellent point, showing why Hillary in her own way is no more fit for the office than Comrade Trump.

too funny Jake....She isn't fit mentally, physically, emotionally, spiritually, ethically, morally, etc.................................She is a lying criminal...and you like her. What does that say about you?

Neither of them are fit is the point. You show you are a liar. I don't like her, and I support Johnson, as you well know. You are also a hypocrite, because though you are saying you hate HRC's neo-imperialism, we both know that Trump will send more troops overseas.

Let's make it easy for libertarians and those who oppose overseas adventurism: bad = Trump and Clinton. Good = Johnson.

How do you know..."Trump will send more troops overseas?" We certainly know Hillary is a warmonger, because her past years in government prove it. Trump has no such history, so we don't know. You are not only guessing, but assuming he would be worse than Cankles. Now that is dumb Jake.

Trump was against the Iraq War and condemned it harshly in the R debates, making Little Jebby and the RNC squirm. Trump has also stated a willingness to work with Putin. His approach is clearly at odds with NATO, the Oligarchy, the two parties, Pentagon....plus Big Ears and Cankles clearly have no intention of working with Putin. So does Trump deserve any points for this, in your mind?

Hillary condemned Al Qaeida for the 9/11/01 attack on the US.

Hillary argued for the Iraq War.

Hillary VOTED for the Iraq War.

Hillary then condemned the decision to go to war in Iraq.

Hillary's State department was working with Qaddafi who was helping the US fight terrorists in Nrthrn Africa

Hillary then helped Obama ALLY themselves with Al Qaeida

Hillary then helped barry drag the US into their own personal war to help Al Qaeida kill Qaddafi & take over Libya


...damn, Hillary is eligible for the Nobel Peace Prize the day she steps into office, just like Barry.

She was also gung-ho for Bubba's stupid war in the former Yugoslavia.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Liar?

She admitted that she is experienced with handling classified information...but she claims she could not recognize Top Secret Compartmentalized information - from a program she had to be 'read into' - when she saw it on her e-mail.

She claimed to know how the classified markings and system works, but according to the testimony f several of her staff members Hillary ordered them to strip the classified markings off of documents so they could send them out instead of being delayed because the classified systems for sending them out were down / not working.

She claimed to know how the classified markings and system works but did not know that Top Secret satellite imagery from a Top Secret Satellite that did not have markings on them were still classified due to the source.

You can't have it both ways, Jake - was she lying before now or lying now. (Trick question - we KNOW she was lying before because Comey pointed it out under oath/testimony AND because she received 1 x 'FALSE', 1 x 'PANTS ON FIRE' & 4 x 'PINOCCHIOS' from 3 Fact-Check sites!)

She either KNEW the information was classified and did not give a damn, intentionally choosing to break the law OR she was clueless and low would rather seem criminal than stupid so she is making the claim she knew better.

Which is it, Jake?

Yep, your opinion is not accepted by the House or the FBI or the AG. You know it, I know it, and everybody here knows it. Yeah, you are a liar.

 

[JakeStarkey]

This is an excellent point, showing why Hillary in her own way is no more fit for the office than Comrade Trump.

too funny Jake....She isn't fit mentally, physically, emotionally, spiritually, ethically, morally, etc.................................She is a lying criminal...and you like her. What does that say about you?

Neither of them are fit is the point. You show you are a liar. I don't like her, and I support Johnson, as you well know. You are also a hypocrite, because though you are saying you hate HRC's neo-imperialism, we both know that Trump will send more troops overseas.

Let's make it easy for libertarians and those who oppose overseas adventurism: bad = Trump and Clinton. Good = Johnson.

How do you know..."Trump will send more troops overseas?" We certainly know Hillary is a warmonger, because her past years in government prove it. Trump has no such history, so we don't know. You are not only guessing, but assuming he would be worse than Cankles. Now that is dumb Jake.

Trump was against the Iraq War and condemned it harshly in the R debates, making Little Jebby and the RNC squirm. Trump has also stated a willingness to work with Putin. His approach is clearly at odds with NATO, the Oligarchy, the two parties, Pentagon....plus Big Ears and Cankles clearly have no intention of working with Putin. So does Trump deserve any points for this, in your mind?

Hillary condemned Al Qaeida for the 9/11/01 attack on the US.

Hillary argued for the Iraq War.

Hillary VOTED for the Iraq War.

Hillary then condemned the decision to go to war in Iraq.

Hillary's State department was working with Qaddafi who was helping the US fight terrorists in Nrthrn Africa

Hillary then helped Obama ALLY themselves with Al Qaeida

Hillary then helped barry drag the US into their own personal war to help Al Qaeida kill Qaddafi & take over Libya


...damn, Hillary is eligible for the Nobel Peace Prize the day she steps into office, just like Barry.

She was also gung-ho for Bubba's stupid war in the former Yugoslavia.

Yet, you, supposedly a libertarian, want to elect a man who will become Mr. NeoCon.

 

[easyt65]

Liar?

She admitted that she is experienced with handling classified information...but she claims she could not recognize Top Secret Compartmentalized information - from a program she had to be 'read into' - when she saw it on her e-mail.

She claimed to know how the classified markings and system works, but according to the testimony f several of her staff members Hillary ordered them to strip the classified markings off of documents so they could send them out instead of being delayed because the classified systems for sending them out were down / not working.

She claimed to know how the classified markings and system works but did not know that Top Secret satellite imagery from a Top Secret Satellite that did not have markings on them were still classified due to the source.

You can't have it both ways, Jake - was she lying before now or lying now. (Trick question - we KNOW she was lying before because Comey pointed it out under oath/testimony AND because she received 1 x 'FALSE', 1 x 'PANTS ON FIRE' & 4 x 'PINOCCHIOS' from 3 Fact-Check sites!)

She either KNEW the information was classified and did not give a damn, intentionally choosing to break the law OR she was clueless and low would rather seem criminal than stupid so she is making the claim she knew better.

Which is it, Jake?

Yep, your opinion is not accepted by the House or the FBI or the AG. You know it, I know it, and everybody here knows it. Yeah, you are a liar.

Ah, so now you claim to speak for Congress, for the FBI, and for the AG?!


The FBI has already called you, Hillary, and the AG a liar.

Three Fact Check sites have already awarded Hillary and you 1 x 'FALSE', 1 x 'PANTS ON FIRE', & 4 x 'PINOCCHIOS'.

Go peddle that shit to your Liberals friends who will eat it up, Jake.

 

[easyt65]

Yet, you, supposedly a libertarian, want to elect a man who will become Mr. NeoCon.

You're a LIAR, Jake. I have NEVER said I am a Libertarian. I never said who I will vote for. You keep trying to TELL people what they said, what they believe, what they think, etc...and you keep being proven to be a liar. You need to stick to making your own case because you $UCK at trying to speak for others. You try, but you keep getting exposed as a liar.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yet, you, supposedly a libertarian, want to elect a man who will become Mr. NeoCon.

You're a LIAR, Jake. I have NEVER said I am a Libertarian. I never said who I will vote for. You keep trying to TELL people what they said, what they believe, what they think, etc...and you keep being proven to be a liar. You need to stick to making your own case because you $UCK at trying to speak for others. You try, but you keep getting exposed as a liar.

Read more closely. I said that to gipper in #25, not you. You mixed it up above, so please fix it. I won't let you say misconstrue what others say. Neither Congress, nor the FBI, nor the AG's office have said she has broken the law. You have your opinion for what it's worth. This OP is a fail.

 

[depotoo]

The last 2 did not use a private server! When will you listen?!?

SHE NEVER BROKE THE LAW! It isn't illegal to use a private server as the last two sec of states before her used one.

 

[gipper]

too funny Jake....She isn't fit mentally, physically, emotionally, spiritually, ethically, morally, etc.................................She is a lying criminal...and you like her. What does that say about you?

Neither of them are fit is the point. You show you are a liar. I don't like her, and I support Johnson, as you well know. You are also a hypocrite, because though you are saying you hate HRC's neo-imperialism, we both know that Trump will send more troops overseas.

Let's make it easy for libertarians and those who oppose overseas adventurism: bad = Trump and Clinton. Good = Johnson.

How do you know..."Trump will send more troops overseas?" We certainly know Hillary is a warmonger, because her past years in government prove it. Trump has no such history, so we don't know. You are not only guessing, but assuming he would be worse than Cankles. Now that is dumb Jake.

Trump was against the Iraq War and condemned it harshly in the R debates, making Little Jebby and the RNC squirm. Trump has also stated a willingness to work with Putin. His approach is clearly at odds with NATO, the Oligarchy, the two parties, Pentagon....plus Big Ears and Cankles clearly have no intention of working with Putin. So does Trump deserve any points for this, in your mind?

Hillary condemned Al Qaeida for the 9/11/01 attack on the US.

Hillary argued for the Iraq War.

Hillary VOTED for the Iraq War.

Hillary then condemned the decision to go to war in Iraq.

Hillary's State department was working with Qaddafi who was helping the US fight terrorists in Nrthrn Africa

Hillary then helped Obama ALLY themselves with Al Qaeida

Hillary then helped barry drag the US into their own personal war to help Al Qaeida kill Qaddafi & take over Libya


...damn, Hillary is eligible for the Nobel Peace Prize the day she steps into office, just like Barry.

She was also gung-ho for Bubba's stupid war in the former Yugoslavia.

Yet, you, supposedly a libertarian, want to elect a man who will become Mr. NeoCon.

Again Jake, you do not know that. You constantly dump on Trump, but not Hillary. Hillary is clearly a Neocon, but we don't know about Trump. You would vote Cankles before Trump. Proving what a hypocrite you are.

 

[gipper]

The last 2 did not use a private server! When will you listen?!?

SHE NEVER BROKE THE LAW! It isn't illegal to use a private server as the last two sec of states before her used one.

There is no reaching Mattieboy with logic and reason....he is out where the buses don't run.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You do not know that, gipper. If it were only Trump or Clinton, I would write in Mickey Mouse. Neither of them are qualified. They are both neo-cons, and they will bring us to war. If Clinton were not a neo-con, you would vote for her.

 

[AntonToo]

No other secretary of state used a private server, though they might have used a private email, there is a difference, not that an idiot like you would know this.

Nonsense

Private email = storage of emails on un-authorized server.

If you have GMAIL account for example, guess what, your emails are stored on government-un-authorized google servers.

 

[easyt65]

Neither Congress, nor the FBI, nor the AG's office have said she has broken the law.

When someone says something that is not true ONCE it can be credited as a 'mistake', simply 'not knowing any better'. When someone REPEATEDLY says the same thing over and over again AFTER being corrected, then the 'error' is proven to be INTENTIONAL and thus has now been exposed as a 'LIE'.

Jake, YOU LIE! Let's do this one more time, to kill any credibility you have left:

----------

"FBI Director James Comey testified Thursday that Hillary Clinton’s claims -- some made under oath -- about her use of a private email server were “not true”. (LIES!)

1. Clinton had claimed when testifying before Congress that nothing she sent or received was marked classified.
- COMEY: “That’s not true. … There was classified material emailed.”

Hillary LIED - YOU LIE!



2. On her claim that she used one device:
- COMEY: “She used multiple devices.”

Hillary LIED - YOU LIE!



3. And on her claim that she turned over all work-related emails:
- COMEY: “No, we found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned.”

** HILLARY BROKE THE LAW, SPECIFICALLY THE FOIA & THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT

Hillary LIED - YOU LIE!



“It’s apparent (AS IN 'OBVIOUS') that she lied to the American people,” Rep. Mark Meadows.


Comey testifies Clinton email claims ‘not true’ at heated Hill hearing | Fox News
--------------------

Comey, DIRECTOR of the FBI, made it clear that Hillary Clinton PERJURED herself, that she most certainly DID lie before Congress, that she used more than one device, that she DID send/receive classified material, that she DID break the law...and you and other liberals on this board continue to repeat the same LIE over and over again.


Hillary claimed after his testimony that what he had said was not true. For this declaration she was given 4 x 'PINOCCHIOS' for lying.

After she received her 'dubious award' she once again claimed Comey's testimony was false. For her continues LYING she received 1 x 'FALSE', 1 x 'PANTS ON FIRE', & '4 x PINOCCHIOS' for LYING about LYING....and yet you and others on this board insist that Hillary is telling the truth and that it is Comey and 3 fact Check sites that are the ones who are lying.




As I said, saying something false once and being corrected is an 'error'. Repeating the same false statement over and over after being shown it is false is a LIE! YOU LIE, Jake!



And, AGAIN, as a CITIZEN - which is what she was - having any classified information / material on her private server AFTER leaving the State Department WAS / IS ILLEGAL!

By having Top Secret+ information on her unauthorized personal server in her possession, let alone in the bathroom of an IT company that didn't have the required security clearance to have that information, SHE BROKE THE LAW!

 

[depotoo]

They were not private, period. And according to Comey, gmail, hotmail, etc. would have been more secure than her setup. And you really need to read the documents the fbi released on the investigation. It is even worse than what you could begin to imagine.

No other secretary of state used a private server, though they might have used a private email, there is a difference, not that an idiot like you would know this.

Nonsense

Private email = storage of emails on un-authorized server.

If you have GMAIL account for example, guess what, your emails are stored on government-un-authorized google servers.

 

[Theowl32]

SHE NEVER BROKE THE LAW! It isn't illegal to use a private server as the last two sec of states before her used one.

Hi stupid. Don't you pay for carbon credits?

 

[gipper]

Neither Congress, nor the FBI, nor the AG's office have said she has broken the law.

When someone says something that is not true ONCE it can be credited as a 'mistake', simply 'not knowing any better'. When someone REPEATEDLY says the same thing over and over again AFTER being corrected, then the 'error' is proven to be INTENTIONAL and thus has now been exposed as a 'LIE'.

Jake, YOU LIE! Let's do this one more time, to kill any credibility you have left:

----------

"FBI Director James Comey testified Thursday that Hillary Clinton’s claims -- some made under oath -- about her use of a private email server were “not true”. (LIES!)

1. Clinton had claimed when testifying before Congress that nothing she sent or received was marked classified.
- COMEY: “That’s not true. … There was classified material emailed.”

Hillary LIED - YOU LIE!



2. On her claim that she used one device:
- COMEY: “She used multiple devices.”

Hillary LIED - YOU LIE!



3. And on her claim that she turned over all work-related emails:
- COMEY: “No, we found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned.”

** HILLARY BROKE THE LAW, SPECIFICALLY THE FOIA & THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT

Hillary LIED - YOU LIE!



“It’s apparent (AS IN 'OBVIOUS') that she lied to the American people,” Rep. Mark Meadows.


Comey testifies Clinton email claims ‘not true’ at heated Hill hearing | Fox News
--------------------

Comey, DIRECTOR of the FBI, made it clear that Hillary Clinton PERJURED herself, that she most certainly DID lie before Congress, that she used more than one device, that she DID send/receive classified material, that she DID break the law...and you and other liberals on this board continue to repeat the same LIE over and over again.


Hillary claimed after his testimony that what he had said was not true. For this declaration she was given 4 x 'PINOCCHIOS' for lying.

After she received her 'dubious award' she once again claimed Comey's testimony was false. For her continues LYING she received 1 x 'FALSE', 1 x 'PANTS ON FIRE', & '4 x PINOCCHIOS' for LYING about LYING....and yet you and others on this board insist that Hillary is telling the truth and that it is Comey and 3 fact Check sites are the ones who are lying.




As I said, saying something false once and being corrected is an 'error'. Repeating the same false statement over and over after being shown it is false is a LIE! YOU LIE, Jake!



And, AGAIN, as a CITIZEN - which is what she was - having any classified information / material on her private server AFTER leaving the State Department WAS / IS ILLEGAL!

By having Top Secret+ information on her unauthorized personal server in her possession, let alone in the bathroom of an IT company that didn't have the required security clearance to have that information, SHE BROKE THE LAW!

One thing is certain about Jake, he is a liar...in a funny kind of dofusy way. He believes whatever MSLSD tells him.

I bet if you asked him about Trump's hands, he would give a long dissertation.

 

[candycorn]

 

[gipper]

Oh my sweet Candycane is here...but you know that quote does not apply to you and your beloved Cankles.

 

[Votto]

Thanks to the Press, Her Story Keeps On Changing

Hillary initially claimed she had no idea that the 'C' was in the margins of par of documents in parapraphs in her e-mails. (C = Confidential, which is a classified marking)

It was also falsely reported Hillary had never completed security training required to obtain her security training, which according to her camp meant 'she didn't know'. It has since been reported that she DID complete the training. (That claim may have something to do with it being ILLEGAL not to have done so, not to mention extremely careless for a presidential nominee.)

Now her claim that she didn't know what 'C' stood for goes down.

I just finished watching a video clip of Hillary on her brand new plane, confined in a small, inescapable space with the media she decided to invite on her latest campaign trip, a decision I am sure she partly regrets now.

On the flight, the media asked her what she did know and what she didn't. Ever hear the old saying 'Damned if you do, Damned if you don't'?! Hillary had the option of looking clueless about classified markings - not appealing for a presidential candidate, or bragging about her experience...and looking criminal. Hillary chose the latter.

Hillary declared 'of course' she knew what 'C' meant and that she is fully aware of he classification system, as she was in several key Congressional boards that involved classification markings.

So, in that admission, she admitted she broke the law when she used illegal unauthorized unencrypted personal servers and sent/received emails/documents that were classified.




https://www.google.com/amp/nypost.c...documents-on-clinton-email-investigation/amp/

Define "illegal".