flacaltenn
Diamond Member
Nope, that still doesn't make him a judge. It also doesn't show judges can revoke an immunity deal.Holyfuckingshit!"One thing's for certain.. An immunized person can be COMPELLED to testify"One thing's for certain.. An immunized person can be COMPELLED to testify.. And that's dangerous enough. Because any NEW perjuries or lying they commit constitutes an "uncovered independent" matter... So the computer tech and her aides can be compelled to give further testimony even if they have their own immunity deals....
LOL
Who said otherwise?
What remains unproven, is the claim a judge can revoke an immunity deal.
Mueller just revoked Comey's immunity and for all practical purposes special counsels are pretty much judge and jury.. Especially with the bogus plea deals that Mueller came up with in multiple cases where he added charges that had ZERO CHANCE of being proven at trial....
When did Mueller become a judge??
When he starts weighing in on whether on Trump was "exonerated" or not for starters.. The legal system doesn't grant exonerations unless you were proven guilty and later reversed...
But when he indicted the 13 Russian trolls KNOWING the case would never see a courtroom, you can pad all the all goofy evidence you want to make yourself look manly... Or stick in an indictment in the Cohen matter that is POLITICALLY important but would probably get tossed on pre-trial motions....
In cases under DOJ jurisdiction, no judge can revoke properly granted immunity.. BUT APPARENTLY, the Attorney General might be able to -- even if it was given thru special counsel....
9-23.000 - Witness Immunity
9-23.400 - AUTHORIZATION TO PROSECUTE AFTER COMPULSION
After a person has testified or provided information pursuant to a compulsion order—except in the case of act-of-production immunity—an attorney for the government shall not initiate or recommend prosecution of the person for an offense or offenses first disclosed in, or closely related to, such testimony or information without the express written authorization of the Attorney General. Such requests for authorization should be sent to the Assistant Attorney General for the division that issued the letter of authority for requesting the original compulsion order.
The request to prosecute should indicate the circumstances justifying prosecution and the method by which the government will be able to establish that the evidence it will use against the witness will meet the government's burden under Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972).