History of Traditional Marriage

[JakeStarkey]

 

[Yurt]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

In case anyone is interested -

History of Traditional Marriage US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

and

CDZ - What is traditional marriage US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[Luddly Neddite]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

 

[Yurt]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

 

[aaronleland]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

So traditionally marriage is what society deems it to be? Get ready for gay marriage.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

First you said "the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman". Then when you saw the proof that there is no such thing as "traditional" marriage, you changed it to "virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman".

Next, you'll write that 'a lot, many, some were beteen a man and woman'.

A yurt's gotta yurtle.

 

[Yurt]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

First you said "the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman". Then when you saw the proof that there is no such thing as "traditional" marriage, you changed it to "virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman".

Next, you'll write that 'a lot, many, some were beteen a man and woman'.

A yurt's gotta yurtle.

you obviously don't understand what traditional means. traditional means what the vast majority of people or a society do. in marriage, it has been traditionally between a man and a woman. this is because 99.9% of marriages have been between a man and a woman. using .01% to claim there is no traditional marriage between a man and a woman is ignorant.

you didn't present facts so much as you presented bullshit propaganda. you do that all the time. and then you run away. you troll like that.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Troll like Yurt count, 'one', 'two', 'lots', 'many'.

 

[Yurt]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

So traditionally marriage is what society deems it to be? Get ready for gay marriage.

traditions change. and so does society. in our society you can get divorced in 1 day, marry and divorce as many times as you want. this blows the religious argument out of the water. if we allow such marriages and given that marriage is a contract in the US, there is absolutely no reason to deny gays the same access to marriage. the traditional argument falls flat given many marriages are no longer traditional.

but, traditionally, it is true that marriage has been between a man and a woman. Luddly Neddite can't grasp that simple fact.

 

[Yurt]

Troll like Yurt count, 'one', 'two', 'lots', 'many'.

i'm having rational discussions with people about your thread topic and this is your first response? to troll....you can't debate your way out of a wet paper bag so all you do is insult, troll, lie and whatever else it is you do

you're so dumb fakey

 

[aaronleland]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

So traditionally marriage is what society deems it to be? Get ready for gay marriage.

traditions change. and so does society. in our society you can get divorced in 1 day, marry and divorce as many times as you want. this blows the religious argument out of the water. if we allow such marriages and given that marriage is a contract in the US, there is absolutely no reason to deny gays the same access to marriage. the traditional argument falls flat given many marriages are no longer traditional.

but, traditionally, it is true that marriage has been between a man and a woman. Luddly Neddite can't grasp that simple fact.

"Tradition" in marriage has been fluid throughout history. Just because gender has been the one constant doesn't make it exempt from change.

 

[Derideo_Te]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

How many wives did Solomon have?

How about Abraham?

How many did Jesus have?

Oh wait, he just hung around with a bunch of sailors and the only women in his life were his mother and a prostitute.

Oh, and did I forget to mention that he had two fathers?

 

[Yurt]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

How many wives did Solomon have?

How about Abraham?

How many did Jesus have?

Oh wait, he just hung around with a bunch of sailors and the only women in his life were his mother and a prostitute.

Oh, and did I forget to mention that he had two fathers?

were they married to men?

 

[Yurt]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

So traditionally marriage is what society deems it to be? Get ready for gay marriage.

traditions change. and so does society. in our society you can get divorced in 1 day, marry and divorce as many times as you want. this blows the religious argument out of the water. if we allow such marriages and given that marriage is a contract in the US, there is absolutely no reason to deny gays the same access to marriage. the traditional argument falls flat given many marriages are no longer traditional.

but, traditionally, it is true that marriage has been between a man and a woman. Luddly Neddite can't grasp that simple fact.

"Tradition" in marriage has been fluid throughout history. Just because gender has been the one constant doesn't make it exempt from change.

i agree. but saying that there is no traditional marriage between a man and a woman is a weak argument. the fact remains that, as you say, it has been the one constant, thus, it is absolutely true that in the traditional sense, marriage has been between a man and a woman.

 

[Derideo_Te]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

How many wives did Solomon have?

How about Abraham?

How many did Jesus have?

Oh wait, he just hung around with a bunch of sailors and the only women in his life were his mother and a prostitute.

Oh, and did I forget to mention that he had two fathers?

were they married to men?

His mother wasn't when she conceived him.

 

[Yurt]

i see what you're trying to show...but it really doesn't negate the fact that traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

the traditional marriage argument is a weak one in today's society and with our laws.

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

How many wives did Solomon have?

How about Abraham?

How many did Jesus have?

Oh wait, he just hung around with a bunch of sailors and the only women in his life were his mother and a prostitute.

Oh, and did I forget to mention that he had two fathers?

were they married to men?

His mother wasn't when she conceived him.

yet, she still married a man....you're not doing very well here.

 

[Yurt]

Troll like Yurt count, 'one', 'two', 'lots', 'many'.

how is my discussing your thread topic trolling, but this post is not?

 

[Derideo_Te]

Nope.

Check out the links here.

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

How many wives did Solomon have?

How about Abraham?

How many did Jesus have?

Oh wait, he just hung around with a bunch of sailors and the only women in his life were his mother and a prostitute.

Oh, and did I forget to mention that he had two fathers?

were they married to men?

His mother wasn't when she conceived him.

yet, she still married a man....you're not doing very well here.

If she never consummated the marriage then it wasn't a genuine marriage.

 

[Yurt]

nice try, but that does not dispel the fact that virtually all marriages have been between a man and a woman...thus, traditionally marriage has been between a man and a woman.

How many wives did Solomon have?

How about Abraham?

How many did Jesus have?

Oh wait, he just hung around with a bunch of sailors and the only women in his life were his mother and a prostitute.

Oh, and did I forget to mention that he had two fathers?

were they married to men?

His mother wasn't when she conceived him.

yet, she still married a man....you're not doing very well here.

If she never consummated the marriage then it wasn't a genuine marriage.

when proven wrong, move the goal posts....