Hobby Lobby

Hobby Lobby - who felt so strongly about the use of "abortion causing drugs" (even though they do not cause abortions), because of the deep deep deep "religion of the corporation" (ha!) are fully able to direct their investment managers to buy only stocks or funds that match the "religion of the corporation."

Yet they didn't.

Nor did they care enough to know whether they covered these items prior to 2013.

Which they did.

Nor do they care the majority of products they buy come from a country where forced abortions happen.

Their "deep" religion on this matter is about as superficial as a mucous membrane.

Once agin the left is trying to dedicate what people do and think,its every bit their right,to challenge this regardless of what has happened in the past.

People after evolve right?? we were told that is perfectly ok to change ones mind,right?
 
Atheist says,

401(k) contribution is controlled by the employee, not the corporation.

It's not a Hobby Lobby decision.

Mother Jones is a liberal hack publication doing nothing but stirring up shit and making false comparisons.

Liberal fools eat it up, based upon emotion, not fact.

Sigh.


Kind of like believing Plan B is an abortion pill?


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
Yep, kinda like that.
But we let people believe what they want to until facts prove otherwise.
 
Atheist says,
401(k) contribution is controlled by the employee, not the corporation.
It's not a Hobby Lobby decision.
Mother Jones is a liberal hack publication doing nothing but stirring up shit and making false comparisons.
Liberal fools eat it up, based upon emotion, not fact.
Sigh.

BUt here's the point. Hobby Lobby chooses the funds that the 401K can invest in.

They could say to the company running it, "We don't want any abortion pill manufacturers to be offered as options".

But much like they didn't make a big deal about the kinds of contraception offered before the ACA passed, they probably didnt look at this, either.
 
Atheist says,



401(k) contribution is controlled by the employee, not the corporation.



It's not a Hobby Lobby decision.



Mother Jones is a liberal hack publication doing nothing but stirring up shit and making false comparisons.



Liberal fools eat it up, based upon emotion, not fact.



Sigh.





Kind of like believing Plan B is an abortion pill?





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Yep, kinda like that.

But we let people believe what they want to until facts prove otherwise.


That makes no sense.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
 
it is entirely accurate.
No it isn't.

The corporation Hobby Lobby didn't invest their money in any of these pharm companies, their employees did in their 401ks. Have you ever had a 401k? You know that belongs to you as an individual investor right? When you leave you take the money, it isn't Hobby Lobby's and they certainly don't dictate which mutual funds employees choose.


reality: corporations don't practice ANY religion.
Agreed 100%.

That doesn't make your headline accurate.

If HL offers the 401k and particularly if it contributes to the owner's fund, then, yeah, HL has just lost the SCOTUS decision.
 
it is entirely accurate.
No it isn't.

The corporation Hobby Lobby didn't invest their money in any of these pharm companies, their employees did in their 401ks. Have you ever had a 401k? You know that belongs to you as an individual investor right? When you leave you take the money, it isn't Hobby Lobby's and they certainly don't dictate which mutual funds employees choose.


reality: corporations don't practice ANY religion.
Agreed 100%.

That doesn't make your headline accurate.

If HL offers the 401k and particularly if it contributes to the owner's fund, then, yeah, HL has just lost the SCOTUS decision.

I don't see how. SCOTUS can't consider facts brought up outside the arguments made in front of it.
 
No it isn't.

The corporation Hobby Lobby didn't invest their money in any of these pharm companies, their employees did in their 401ks. Have you ever had a 401k? You know that belongs to you as an individual investor right? When you leave you take the money, it isn't Hobby Lobby's and they certainly don't dictate which mutual funds employees choose.



Agreed 100%.

That doesn't make your headline accurate.

If HL offers the 401k and particularly if it contributes to the owner's fund, then, yeah, HL has just lost the SCOTUS decision.

I don't see how. SCOTUS can't consider facts brought up outside the arguments made in front of it.

Do you truly think SCOTUS members unofficially do not consider material other than what is put before them?
 
If HL offers the 401k and particularly if it contributes to the owner's fund, then, yeah, HL has just lost the SCOTUS decision.

I don't see how. SCOTUS can't consider facts brought up outside the arguments made in front of it.

Do you truly think SCOTUS members unofficially do not consider material other than what is put before them?

Mostly.

I also think that if SCOTUS shoots this argument down, it will because of the wider implication that corporations are indistinguishable from the people who run them, which would destroy the "Corporate Viel" that keeps CEO's and Stockholders from being personally sued.

Which means they'll do the right thing, for the wrong reason.
 
Atheist says,
401(k) contribution is controlled by the employee, not the corporation.
It's not a Hobby Lobby decision.
Mother Jones is a liberal hack publication doing nothing but stirring up shit and making false comparisons.
Liberal fools eat it up, based upon emotion, not fact.
Sigh.

BUt here's the point. Hobby Lobby chooses the funds that the 401K can invest in.

They could say to the company running it, "We don't want any abortion pill manufacturers to be offered as options".

But much like they didn't make a big deal about the kinds of contraception offered before the ACA passed, they probably didnt look at this, either.
But when weemen take slut pills for their lady parts after they have oops sex, it makes baby Jesus cry.
 

Forum List

Back
Top