🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Holder institutes mandatory minimum sentencing reform

mamooth

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2012
34,767
17,955
1,915
Indianapolis, Indiana
Hey, it's a good start.

Welcome to the United States Department of Justice
---
We will start by fundamentally rethinking the notion of mandatory minimum sentences for drug-related crimes. Some statutes that mandate inflexible sentences – regardless of the individual conduct at issue in a particular case – reduce the discretion available to prosecutors, judges, and juries. Because they oftentimes generate unfairly long sentences, they breed disrespect for the system. When applied indiscriminately, they do not serve public safety. They – and some of the enforcement priorities we have set – have had a destabilizing effect on particular communities, largely poor and of color. And, applied inappropriately, they are ultimately counterproductive.

This is why I have today mandated a modification of the Justice Department’s charging policies so that certain low-level, nonviolent drug offenders who have no ties to large-scale organizations, gangs, or cartels will no longer be charged with offenses that impose draconian mandatory minimum sentences. They now will be charged with offenses for which the accompanying sentences are better suited to their individual conduct, rather than excessive prison terms more appropriate for violent criminals or drug kingpins. By reserving the most severe penalties for serious, high-level, or violent drug traffickers, we can better promote public safety, deterrence, and rehabilitation – while making our expenditures smarter and more productive.
---
 
Holder institutes mandatory minimum sentencing reform

Yeah, they are reaching out in desperation for the Libertarian vote......( read Independents )
 
If it was possible to tempt libertarians out of the the GOP embrace by liberty, that would have happened long ago. The administration knows that. This latest falls more under the category of "doing the right thing."
 
It is NOT the right thing, the right thing is to actually CHANGE the laws. Holder has no authority nor does the President to not enforce laws they find offensive or to draconian.

Only Congress can change the law. Put the Conservatives and the Liberals on the hot seat, make new laws repealing the old laws. Lets see who supports what.

Other wise this in itself is criminal conduct and Unconstitutional.
 
Hey, it's a good start.

While I stand against mandatory minimum sentencing, I wonder if you'll support the next AG that decides to arbitrarily violate the Constitution by picking and choosing which laws to enforce or overturn.

A slippery slope if there ever was one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top