Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
70% of this country thinks these people should have the right to live their lives the way they see fit. Why is it such a problem?
Do you really want to make life hell for these people or what? It isn't right and I think some people need to learn to respect peoples personal liberties.
Conservatives are only interested in personal liberties they agree with. When they don't approve of what you're doing then they run straight to Big Brother government to put a stop to it.
The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.70% of this country thinks these people should have the right to live their lives the way they see fit. Why is it such a problem?
Do you really want to make life hell for these people or what? It isn't right and I think some people need to learn to respect peoples personal liberties.
Conservatives are only interested in personal liberties they agree with. When they don't approve of what you're doing then they run straight to Big Brother government to put a stop to it.
No, actually, we're pretty consistent about being interested in personal liberties THAT DO NOT HARM OTHER PEOPLE. It's only leftists who pick and choose their freedoms according to momentary circumstance and who wants it.
If I have a tendency toward violence, do I have the personal liberty to cut myself? Do I also have the personal liberty to beat my children?
(Hint: the answers are "yes" and "no" in that order.)
Nobody in this country (at least nobody that pretends to be sane) thinks that people have the right to live their lives they way they see fit..if in doing that they are actively damaging/abusing children.
Apparently, Jessica123 thinks that. This is not the first thread in which I have seen her make a similar remark in defense of the sexual abuse of children.
There is no sexual abuse of children taking place here and how other people choose to raise their children is none of your business.
The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.
The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.70% of this country thinks these people should have the right to live their lives the way they see fit. Why is it such a problem?
Do you really want to make life hell for these people or what? It isn't right and I think some people need to learn to respect peoples personal liberties.
Conservatives are only interested in personal liberties they agree with. When they don't approve of what you're doing then they run straight to Big Brother government to put a stop to it.
No, actually, we're pretty consistent about being interested in personal liberties THAT DO NOT HARM OTHER PEOPLE. It's only leftists who pick and choose their freedoms according to momentary circumstance and who wants it.
If I have a tendency toward violence, do I have the personal liberty to cut myself? Do I also have the personal liberty to beat my children?
(Hint: the answers are "yes" and "no" in that order.)
Perhaps you should preface your statement by a "generally speaking" clause there... or are we all to digress to the point of making blanket, absolutistist statements here... lol70% of this country thinks these people should have the right to live their lives the way they see fit. Why is it such a problem?
Do you really want to make life hell for these people or what? It isn't right and I think some people need to learn to respect peoples personal liberties.
Conservatives are only interested in personal liberties they agree with. When they don't approve of what you're doing then they run straight to Big Brother government to put a stop to it.
If you're referring to the two videos from the idiotic OP, please explain exactly what that has to do with parenting by gay people. If there is something else that I'm missing spell it out. You seem to have some strange ideas. Gay people are now allowed to adopt kids in every state, and in some states, have been for quite some time. That would not be the case if they were being harmed.The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.70% of this country thinks these people should have the right to live their lives the way they see fit. Why is it such a problem?
Do you really want to make life hell for these people or what? It isn't right and I think some people need to learn to respect peoples personal liberties.
Conservatives are only interested in personal liberties they agree with. When they don't approve of what you're doing then they run straight to Big Brother government to put a stop to it.
No, actually, we're pretty consistent about being interested in personal liberties THAT DO NOT HARM OTHER PEOPLE. It's only leftists who pick and choose their freedoms according to momentary circumstance and who wants it.
If I have a tendency toward violence, do I have the personal liberty to cut myself? Do I also have the personal liberty to beat my children?
(Hint: the answers are "yes" and "no" in that order.)
The simple and irrefutable fact is that all the videos being posted on this thread are credible evidence that same-sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harm children. Yet leftists insist there's "no evidence" by simple virtue of the fact that they refuse to ACCEPT any evidence. "I don't want to believe that's bad" is not the same thing as "that's not bad".
There is nothing more disgusting than people who will cover for other people who abuse children. Or anybody, for that matter.Nobody in this country (at least nobody that pretends to be sane) thinks that people have the right to live their lives they way they see fit..if in doing that they are actively damaging/abusing children.
Apparently, Jessica123 thinks that. This is not the first thread in which I have seen her make a similar remark in defense of the sexual abuse of children.
There is no sexual abuse of children taking place here and how other people choose to raise their children is none of your business.
What's it like, being a scumbag? Because I'm pretty sure that's what a person would have to be to figure out, let alone understand, where it is you're drawing the line of "sexual abuse".
I completely agree !!There is nothing more disgusting than people who will cover for other people who abuse children. Or anybody, for that matter.Nobody in this country (at least nobody that pretends to be sane) thinks that people have the right to live their lives they way they see fit..if in doing that they are actively damaging/abusing children.
Apparently, Jessica123 thinks that. This is not the first thread in which I have seen her make a similar remark in defense of the sexual abuse of children.
There is no sexual abuse of children taking place here and how other people choose to raise their children is none of your business.
What's it like, being a scumbag? Because I'm pretty sure that's what a person would have to be to figure out, let alone understand, where it is you're drawing the line of "sexual abuse".
No, it is what INSANE PEOPLE call indoctrination and grooming. It is what SANE PEOPLE call efforts to keep kids safe from pregnancy and STDs . You are so fucking pathetic !
The slower & more deliberate message was " come on kiddies & see a sex show!"
There is nothing more disgusting than people who will cover for other people who abuse children. Or anybody, for that matter.Nobody in this country (at least nobody that pretends to be sane) thinks that people have the right to live their lives they way they see fit..if in doing that they are actively damaging/abusing children.
Apparently, Jessica123 thinks that. This is not the first thread in which I have seen her make a similar remark in defense of the sexual abuse of children.
There is no sexual abuse of children taking place here and how other people choose to raise their children is none of your business.
What's it like, being a scumbag? Because I'm pretty sure that's what a person would have to be to figure out, let alone understand, where it is you're drawing the line of "sexual abuse".
The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.
Except the reams and reams and tomes and tomes of research showing that a boy not having a father or a girl not having a mother for life is deleterious to them. Just that. And that uniquely of all parenting situations, "gay marrieds" possess a contract they share with prospective children that guarantees them the absence of a father or mother under their roof for life.
Just that. Same sex marriage actually, truly, provenly, and proximally hurts children for the duration of their entire lives; using a contract no less. That is illegal also per contract laws where both adults and children share vital benefits. See Obergefell Opinion page 15 for details; and the Infancy Doctrine.. Fun fact, children's interests in the contract re: their stated benefits and shared-status, was not separately briefed to the court in Obergefell. That means the USSC in Obergefell did not follow law in rendering its decision.
The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.70% of this country thinks these people should have the right to live their lives the way they see fit. Why is it such a problem?
Do you really want to make life hell for these people or what? It isn't right and I think some people need to learn to respect peoples personal liberties.
Conservatives are only interested in personal liberties they agree with. When they don't approve of what you're doing then they run straight to Big Brother government to put a stop to it.
No, actually, we're pretty consistent about being interested in personal liberties THAT DO NOT HARM OTHER PEOPLE. It's only leftists who pick and choose their freedoms according to momentary circumstance and who wants it.
If I have a tendency toward violence, do I have the personal liberty to cut myself? Do I also have the personal liberty to beat my children?
(Hint: the answers are "yes" and "no" in that order.)
The simple and irrefutable fact is that all the videos being posted on this thread are credible evidence that same-sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harm children. .
If you're referring to the two videos from the idiotic OP, please explain exactly what that has to do with parenting by gay people. If there is something else that I'm missing spell it out. You seem to have some strange ideas. Gay people are now allowed to adopt kids in every state, and in some states, have been for quite some time. That would not be the case if they were being harmed.The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.70% of this country thinks these people should have the right to live their lives the way they see fit. Why is it such a problem?
Do you really want to make life hell for these people or what? It isn't right and I think some people need to learn to respect peoples personal liberties.
Conservatives are only interested in personal liberties they agree with. When they don't approve of what you're doing then they run straight to Big Brother government to put a stop to it.
No, actually, we're pretty consistent about being interested in personal liberties THAT DO NOT HARM OTHER PEOPLE. It's only leftists who pick and choose their freedoms according to momentary circumstance and who wants it.
If I have a tendency toward violence, do I have the personal liberty to cut myself? Do I also have the personal liberty to beat my children?
(Hint: the answers are "yes" and "no" in that order.)
The simple and irrefutable fact is that all the videos being posted on this thread are credible evidence that same-sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harm children. Yet leftists insist there's "no evidence" by simple virtue of the fact that they refuse to ACCEPT any evidence. "I don't want to believe that's bad" is not the same thing as "that's not bad".
The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.
Except the reams and reams and tomes and tomes of research showing that a boy not having a father or a girl not having a mother for life is deleterious to them. Just that. And that uniquely of all parenting situations, "gay marrieds" possess a contract they share with prospective children that guarantees them the absence of a father or mother under their roof for life.
Just that. Same sex marriage actually, truly, provenly, and proximally hurts children for the duration of their entire lives; using a contract no less. That is illegal also per contract laws where both adults and children share vital benefits. See Obergefell Opinion page 15 for details; and the Infancy Doctrine.. Fun fact, children's interests in the contract re: their stated benefits and shared-status, was not separately briefed to the court in Obergefell. That means the USSC in Obergefell did not follow law in rendering its decision.
It is stunning to me that anyone can look at the complex, complicated, difficult job of effective parenting and raising a sane, functional, productive human being, which is incredibly hard to do even when you have a mother and father working at it together, and just casually decide that it's no big hairy deal if you simply subtract one of them from the equation. Meh. It's like looking at the schematics for building a nuclear reactor, and then deciding that the lead shielding isn't necessary.
Let's see, what just happened here. You stated that there is proof on this thread that gay parenting is harmful. I called you on it and asked you to point it out instead of doing so , you post this gibberish? Thank you for clearly demonstrating that you nothing but appeals to ignorance logical fallacies at your disposalIf you're referring to the two videos from the idiotic OP, please explain exactly what that has to do with parenting by gay people. If there is something else that I'm missing spell it out. You seem to have some strange ideas. Gay people are now allowed to adopt kids in every state, and in some states, have been for quite some time. That would not be the case if they were being harmed.The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.Conservatives are only interested in personal liberties they agree with. When they don't approve of what you're doing then they run straight to Big Brother government to put a stop to it.
No, actually, we're pretty consistent about being interested in personal liberties THAT DO NOT HARM OTHER PEOPLE. It's only leftists who pick and choose their freedoms according to momentary circumstance and who wants it.
If I have a tendency toward violence, do I have the personal liberty to cut myself? Do I also have the personal liberty to beat my children?
(Hint: the answers are "yes" and "no" in that order.)
The simple and irrefutable fact is that all the videos being posted on this thread are credible evidence that same-sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harm children. Yet leftists insist there's "no evidence" by simple virtue of the fact that they refuse to ACCEPT any evidence. "I don't want to believe that's bad" is not the same thing as "that's not bad".
Yes, because human societies NEVER collectively decide to do things that are bad, harmful, or even evil. Governments are ALWAYS benevolent, omniscient, infallible, and unswayed by the imbecilic, selfish whims of special interest groups. And I fart rainbow glitter when I eat too much Mexican food.
The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.
Except the reams and reams and tomes and tomes of research showing that a boy not having a father or a girl not having a mother for life is deleterious to them..
The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.
Except the reams and reams and tomes and tomes of research showing that a boy not having a father or a girl not having a mother for life is deleterious to them. Just that. And that uniquely of all parenting situations, "gay marrieds" possess a contract they share with prospective children that guarantees them the absence of a father or mother under their roof for life.
Just that. Same sex marriage actually, truly, provenly, and proximally hurts children for the duration of their entire lives; ...... See Obergefell Opinion page .
Let's see, what just happened here. You stated that there is proof on this thread that gay parenting is harmful. I called you on it and asked you to point it out instead of doing so , you post this gibberish? Thank you for clearly demonstrating that you nothing but appeals to ignorance logical fallacies at your disposalIf you're referring to the two videos from the idiotic OP, please explain exactly what that has to do with parenting by gay people. If there is something else that I'm missing spell it out. You seem to have some strange ideas. Gay people are now allowed to adopt kids in every state, and in some states, have been for quite some time. That would not be the case if they were being harmed.The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.No, actually, we're pretty consistent about being interested in personal liberties THAT DO NOT HARM OTHER PEOPLE. It's only leftists who pick and choose their freedoms according to momentary circumstance and who wants it.
If I have a tendency toward violence, do I have the personal liberty to cut myself? Do I also have the personal liberty to beat my children?
(Hint: the answers are "yes" and "no" in that order.)
The simple and irrefutable fact is that all the videos being posted on this thread are credible evidence that same-sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harm children. Yet leftists insist there's "no evidence" by simple virtue of the fact that they refuse to ACCEPT any evidence. "I don't want to believe that's bad" is not the same thing as "that's not bad".
Yes, because human societies NEVER collectively decide to do things that are bad, harmful, or even evil. Governments are ALWAYS benevolent, omniscient, infallible, and unswayed by the imbecilic, selfish whims of special interest groups. And I fart rainbow glitter when I eat too much Mexican food.
The simple and irrefutable fact is that there is no credible evidence to show that same sex marriage and parenting by gay folks harms anyone. Yet conservatives won't leave it alone.
Except the reams and reams and tomes and tomes of research showing that a boy not having a father or a girl not having a mother for life is deleterious to them. Just that. And that uniquely of all parenting situations, "gay marrieds" possess a contract they share with prospective children that guarantees them the absence of a father or mother under their roof for life.
Just that. Same sex marriage actually, truly, provenly, and proximally hurts children for the duration of their entire lives; using a contract no less. That is illegal also per contract laws where both adults and children share vital benefits. See Obergefell Opinion page 15 for details; and the Infancy Doctrine.. Fun fact, children's interests in the contract re: their stated benefits and shared-status, was not separately briefed to the court in Obergefell. That means the USSC in Obergefell did not follow law in rendering its decision.
It is stunning to me that anyone can look at the complex, complicated, difficult job of effective parenting and raising a sane, functional, productive human being, which is incredibly hard to do even when you have a mother and father working at it together, and just casually decide that it's no big hairy deal if you simply subtract one of them from the equation. Meh. It's like looking at the schematics for building a nuclear reactor, and then deciding that the lead shielding isn't necessary.
