Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Read what Moscow is saying.I started another one, just dropped the US part that we all know is true
www.themoscowtimes.com
I started another one, just dropped the US part that we all know is true
www.themoscowtimes.com
www.theguardian.com
Environmental damage from the US attack is absolutely NOT a conspiracy theory. Environmental damage is not some kind of hoax, it belongs in environmental. The US involvement IS critical in discussing the environmental impact, since only the US had enough TNT to create this environmental disaster. The political narrative is being manipulated here to conform to what the left wants.I started another one, just dropped the US part that we all know is true
So No impact?
Natural gas and the environment - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Environmental issues, effects, and impacts of natural gas production and use.www.eia.gov
Natural gas exploration, drilling, and production affects the environment
When geologists explore for natural gas deposits on land, they may disturb vegetation and soil with their vehicles. Drilling a natural gas well on land may require clearing and leveling an area around the well site. Well drilling activities produce air pollution and may disturb people, wildlife, and water resources. Laying pipelines that transport natural gas from wells usually requires clearing land to bury the pipe. Natural gas production can also produce large volumes of contaminated water. This water requires proper handling, storage, and treatment so that it does not pollute land and other waters. Natural gas wells and pipelines often have engines to run equipment and compressors, which produce air pollutants and noise.
In areas where natural gas is produced at oil wells but is not economical to transport for sale or contains high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (a toxic gas), it is burned (flared) at well sites. Natural gas flaring produces CO2, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and many other compounds, depending on the chemical composition of the natural gas and on how well the natural gas burns in the flare. However, flaring is safer than releasing natural gas into the air and results in lower overall greenhouse gas emissions because CO2 is not as strong a greenhouse gas as methane.
Environmental damage from the US attack is absolutely NOT a conspiracy theory. Environmental damage is not some kind of hoax, it belongs in environmental. The US involvement IS critical in discussing the environmental impact, since only the US had enough TNT to create this environmental disaster. The political narrative is being manipulated here to conform to what the left wants.
Raw natural gas causes extreme pollution to the water and to the atmosphere, genius ,but that's what I like about you-- your attention to details normally overlooked by the mainstream.
Not just natural gas, don't forget the 500kg of tnt per pipeline that only the USA had available to create such an environmental mess.
Environmental damage from the US attack is absolutely NOT a conspiracy theory. Environmental damage is not some kind of hoax, it belongs in environmental. The US involvement IS critical in discussing the environmental impact, since only the US had enough TNT to create this environmental disaster. The political narrative is being manipulated here to conform to what the left wants.
www.themoscowtimes.com
TNT in a 500kg per blast quantityOnly the US has TNT?
I have a few threads about this corruption...We agree. Apparently at least one moderator does not.
TNT in a 500kg per blast quantity
Yes, pretty much no impact.
Interesting. You work for Putin, don't you?We may never know how the impact on the environment.
The US caused massive pollution in the Baltic.
How are we going to clean up the pollution from the Nord Stream sabotage?
Was it raw? Link? Explain the "extreme pollution to the water".
We may never know how the impact on the environment.
The US caused massive pollution in the Baltic.
How are we going to clean up the pollution from the Nord Stream sabotage?
I suppose we could give that to somebody else, but we'd still be complicit. I think the brits may have similar capability, but I don't recall them making threats like Beijing Biden made.Why do you feel only the US has that capability?
Is it methane?There's no pollution caused by natural gas.
What is his definition of raw natural gas?
I suppose we could give that to somebody else, but we'd still be complicit. I think the brits may have similar capability, but I don't recall them making threats like Beijing Biden made.
