How can a 9 -0 Court Decision = A 'MAGA' Court?

In the mind of today’s left anyone who doesn’t agree with them one hundred percent of the time is MAGA.
.

I love how they took a phrase about loving the country that has given them so much more than they deserve, and turned it into a slur.

Shows us over and over how they tremble with fear of what MAGA is going to bring.

.
 
It wasn't a 9-0 decision but what the fuck else would you expect from the "news" organization that's $800 million lighter (and counting) because of its well-documented lies?
The decision was 9-0 dummy, how embarrassing for you idiot. Read the decision to look less retarded next time. Further down after the decision there was a 5-4 opinion on clarifying what constitutes US Waters.
 
The decision was 9-0 dummy, how embarrassing for you idiot.

No, you fucking moron, it was not. The Court was 9-0 in that the Sacketts' property was not the kind of property that EPA had authority to regulate.

What Schumer was complaining about was the more important precedent from the decision, which was EPAs authority to issue regulations regarding certain bodies of water (wetlands in this case).

Read the decision to look less retarded next time. Further down after the decision there was a 5-4 opinion on clarifying what constitutes US Waters.

And that's the part that Schumer was complaining about, as was Brett Kavanaugh no less, you dipfuck.
 
806.jpeg
 
Were all the judges appointed by Trump?

:auiqs.jpg:

No. But "making America great again" should be everyone's goal with or without Trump. In this case ... it appears to be a MAGA court if their goal was to help America in her goal to reach greatness.
 

Forum List

Back
Top