How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

[EMH]

So, no, 100 miles isn't enough. Thanks!

LOL!!!

Nice try....

When you actually can refute anything posted.... let us know.

 

[abu afak]

More than 30,000 scientists have signed on to a paper saying that we're not facing a climate emergency.

The 30000 Global Warming Petition is Easily-Debunked ...​

DeSmog
https://www.desmog.com › 2009/07/22 › 30000-glob...
Jul 22, 2009 — So only .1% of the individuals on the list of 30,000 signatures have a scientific background in Climatology. To be fair we can add in those who claim to have a background in Atmospheric Science, which brings the total percentage of signatories with a background in climate change science to a whopping .5%.

Did 30000 Scientists Declare Climate Change a Hoax?​

Snopes
https://www.snopes.com › Fact Check
Claim: 30,000 scientists have signed a petition arguing that there is no convincing scientific evidence for anthropogenic climate change.
Fact check by Snopes.com: Mostly False

Did 30000 scientists declare that climate change is a hoax?​

Quora
https://www.quora.com › Did-30-000-scientists-declare-t...
No. A petition was launched in 1998 and over the Twenty Years it's been running it's managed to gather 31000 signatures. That might Seem like a lot But a ...

`

 

[abu afak]

We are still waiting for one of the science invalid parrots here who believes Co2 actually does cause warming to explain

How did Co2 Melt North America and Freeze Greenland at the same time??


Still waiting...

All these morons do is parrot fudgebaking liars. They are obsessed with it, because none of them is any good at all in practicing

ACTUAL SCIENCE
Click to expand...

North America is 30-45° N Latitude, Greenland is 71° N Latitude.
You know how that works you MENTALLY ILL MUTHER FUKKER?
Why is Florida warmer than Chicago?
Got it!
There goes 500 of your Wacked posts!
You need to be removed you No IQ Mental Patient.

`

`

 

[EMH]

North America is 30-45° N Latitude, Greenland is 71° N Latitude.
You know how that works you MENTALLY ILL MUTHER FUKKER?
Why is Florida warmer than Chicago?
Got it!
There goes 500 of your Wacked posts!
You need to be removed you No IQ Mental Patient.

`

`

LMFAO!!!


Every piece of land within 600 miles of an Earth pole is in ICE AGE.

Every piece of land outside of 600 miles of an Earth pole is NOT in ice age.

THANKS...


Now explain why Greenland has ice age glacier way south of the Arctic Circle, while Alaska has trees and moose way north of the Arctic Circle...



LOL!!!!



BAWK ON, PSYCHO MORON!!!

 

[ReinyDays]

Every million years = 20-50 miles

So ... like a couple furlongs since the last glaciation 15,000 years ago? ... [giggle] ... that doesn't explain why there's no ice sheet currently covering ...

... the Yucatan ...

... In North America ... or did you mean Baffin Island in Canada? ...

 

[EMH]

So ... like a couple furlongs since the last glaciation 15,000 years ago? ... [giggle] ... that doesn't explain why there's no ice sheet currently covering ...

... the Yucatan ...

... In North America ... or did you mean Baffin Island in Canada? ...

LOL!!!

Every piece of land within 600 miles of an Earth pole is IN ICE AGE. THAT is why Greenland has ice way SOUTH of the Arctic Circle, and Alaska and Canada have trees and moose way NORTH of the Arctic Circle.

And you and your side CANNOT REFUTE that any more than your FUDGE of atmospheric temp data changes the reality of what that data actually said...

Co2 went up

atmospheric temps did not

correlation factor = 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


THEORY REJECTED

 

[EMH]

Yucatan not within 600 miles.... DUH....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

LOL!!!

Nice try....

When you actually can refute anything posted.... let us know.

Chicago was close enough to the pole to be under ice for 30 million years?

Was that your silly claim?

And then, 20,000 years ago, it was suddenly far enough away for the ice age to end?

That's even dumber than your usual claims. LOL!

 

[ReinyDays]

Yucatan not within 600 miles.... DUH....

NO SEA ICE !!! ... too funny ... but YES ... Yucatan is actually ON the North American continent ... and NOT in glaciation ...

Feel free to post your citation ... because it looks like you're making this up on your own as you go along ... and please review your basic meteorology, there's some profound differences between the hemispheres regarding continentality ... much more land in the North than South, especially poleward of 45º ... ice margins will differ considerably ...

 

[Crick]

Every piece of land within 600 miles of an Earth pole is in ICE AGE.

Every piece of land outside of 600 miles of an Earth pole is NOT in ice age.

Now explain why Greenland has ice age glacier way south of the Arctic Circle, while Alaska has trees and moose way north of the Arctic Circle...

So, can you show us a peer-reviewed study whose conclusions agree with those contentions? Cause, you know, I'm more than a little curious where you came up with these. All the rest of us see articles and studies and come to conclusions. But I'd guess the ideas you spout here came solely from your own mind. Is that the case?

 

[EMH]

Chicago was close enough to the pole to be under ice for 30 million years?

Not exactly. The top of North America was within 600 miles and hence entered ice age 30-50 million years ago. That pushed ice down to Chicago and even further, much as the top of Northern Greenland is now within 600 miles of the Pole and hence ICE AGE GLACIER has been pushed well south of the Arctic Circle...

And then, 20,000 years ago, it was suddenly far enough away for the ice age to end?

That there were remnants of North American Ice Age still present even 10k years ago in Indiana is what happens at the end of a continent specific ice age. It actually doesn't all melt at once. It takes hundreds of thousands of years, and ice chunks drift on water at the end of it, scratching rocks and hence you can say

ICE was on Chicago 20k years ago... yeah, but only pieces of what was left over from hundreds of thousands of years of melting


Funny thing is, you have been trying for months to refute any of that, and you are to date batting precisely ZERO....

 

[EMH]

So, can you show us a peer-reviewed study whose conclusions agree with those contentions?

The taxpayer funded "peer-reviewed" studies you speak are only funded if they return a bullshit conclusion about Co2. Their funding should be zeroed out.

I'm more than a little curious where you came up with these

To a PARROT, only PARROTING is allowed. There is no THINKING.

Asking a question about WHY there is ice on Greenland south of the Arctic Circle, and no ice north of the Arctic Circle in Alaska, that is not allowed unless there is a taxpayer funded "study" that links it to Co2 via FUDGE and FRAUD....

WE are waiting for YOUR EXPLANATION, genius...

My conclusions come from THE DATA and the actual practice of SCIENCE, not PARROTING...

And that DATA includes highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2, because


Co2 does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING = THE DATA

 

[EMH]

NO SEA ICE !!! ... too funny ... but YES ... Yucatan is actually ON the North American continent ... and NOT in glaciation ...

Feel free to post your citation ... because it looks like you're making this up on your own as you go along ... and please review your basic meteorology, there's some profound differences between the hemispheres regarding continentality ... much more land in the North than South, especially poleward of 45º ... ice margins will differ considerably ...

This moron cannot read.

North America CAME OUT of ICE AGE.

Greenland ENTERED ICE AGE.

North America IS NOT IN ICE AGE.

GREENLAND IS.


Can you comprehend that??


How did Co2 melt North America and freeze Greenland at the same time??

 

[jc456]

No, it is not. Your claims are false and I can show it.

You personally performed experiments that show CO2 has warmed the planet? Cool, can't wait to see what you did.

 

[jc456]

So, can you show us a peer-reviewed study whose conclusions agree with those contentions? Cause, you know, I'm more than a little curious where you came up with these. All the rest of us see articles and studies and come to conclusions. But I'd guess the ideas you spout here came solely from your own mind. Is that the case?

Here...

Global Warming Petition Project

www.petitionproject.org

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not exactly. The top of North America was within 600 miles and hence entered ice age 30-50 million years ago. That pushed ice down to Chicago and even further, much as the top of Northern Greenland is now within 600 miles of the Pole and hence ICE AGE GLACIER has been pushed well south of the Arctic Circle...

That there were remnants of North American Ice Age still present even 10k years ago in Indiana is what happens at the end of a continent specific ice age. It actually doesn't all melt at once. It takes hundreds of thousands of years, and ice chunks drift on water at the end of it, scratching rocks and hence you can say

ICE was on Chicago 20k years ago... yeah, but only pieces of what was left over from hundreds of thousands of years of melting


Funny thing is, you have been trying for months to refute any of that, and you are to date batting precisely ZERO....

The top of North America was within 600 miles and hence entered ice age 30-50 million years ago.

How far away was it 20,000 years ago?

That there were remnants of North American Ice Age still present even 10k years ago in Indiana is what happens at the end of a continent specific ice age. It actually doesn't all melt at once. It takes hundreds of thousands of years

How long ago did the "top of North America" move more than 600 miles from the pole?

 

[EMH]

The top of North America was within 600 miles and hence entered ice age 30-50 million years ago.

How far away was it 20,000 years ago?

That there were remnants of North American Ice Age still present even 10k years ago in Indiana is what happens at the end of a continent specific ice age. It actually doesn't all melt at once. It takes hundreds of thousands of years

How long ago did the "top of North America" move more than 600 miles from the pole?

If you consider Ellesmere Island to be part of North America, that has not yet happened.

We have gone over this ad nausem, and you just keep repeating it as if it is helping your cause. It is not.

The question is when did the water between Ellesmere and the other Queen Elizabeth Islands change from ice to water. Best guess - 1-5 million years ago. It was definitely all ice for tens of millions of years...

 

[jc456]

Got a question for the warmer team in here, what caused the climate change before human kind? Ice cores show climate changes constantly over the course of the planet's ice sampled. Pre industrial!!!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If you consider Ellesmere Island to be part of North America, that has not yet happened.

We have gone over this ad nausem, and you just keep repeating it as if it is helping your cause. It is not.

The question is when did the water between Ellesmere and the other Queen Elizabeth Islands change from ice to water. Best guess - 1-5 million years ago. It was definitely all ice for tens of millions of years...

If you consider Ellesmere Island to be part of North America, that has not yet happened.

If you consider Ellesmere Island to be part of North America, why isn't there 2 miles of ice
on top of Chicago?

We have gone over this ad nausem

Your claims are sick.

The question is when did the water between Ellesmere and the other Queen Elizabeth Islands change from ice to water. Best guess - 1-5 million years ago.

You're always posting guesses.

 

[EMH]

If you consider Ellesmere Island to be part of North America, why isn't there 2 miles of ice
on top of Chicago?

It requires continuous land, moron. It is now an ISLAND surrounded by WATER = DUH....