How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Haven't spent any time looking.

Increase Earth atmospheric temperature increases surface air pressure. Trying to hide behind hourly hot cold issues is laughable. This is 70 years of steady decrease....

Comparison of the interannual variation in sea level and air pressure at sea level, and the 5-year moving average for the period 1963–2005.​

which perfectly explains...

1. why there is no ocean rise
2. why there is no ongoing net ice melt
3. why Earth is NOT WARMING


If Earth was warming, Surface Air Pressure would increase.... but that is not the case... according to THE DATA.... the UNFUDGED data

Haven't spent any time looking.

You haven't looked for backup for your claim?

Is that because you're a moron?

Or because you quickly realized your claim was wrong?

 

[EMH]

Haven't spent any time looking.

You haven't looked for backup for your claim?

Is that because you're a moron?

Or because you quickly realized your claim was wrong?

Full knowledge it is correct and that you and other Co2 FRAUD sponsors CANNOT REFUTE IT

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Full knowledge it is correct and that you and other Co2 FRAUD sponsors CANNOT REFUTE IT

Full knowledge shows that a hotter surface has a lower air pressure.

 

[EMH]

a hotter surface

Again a lame attempt to blur daily and hourly fluctuations with a 70 year down trend.

The 70 year chart would be measuring such things every year, and hence the 70 year trend filters out any effects of hourly and daily weather changes.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Again a lame attempt to blur daily and hourly fluctuations with a 70 year down trend.

The 70 year chart would be measuring such things every year, and hence the 70 year trend filters out any effects of hourly and daily weather changes.

A 70-year trend of lower surface air pressure.

 

[EMH]

A 70-year trend of lower surface air pressure.

Correct, is 100% proof that there is no ongoing net ice melt.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Correct, is 100% proof that there is no ongoing net ice melt.

Warmer means lower surface air pressure.

Still no evidence to the contrary?

 

[EMH]

Warmer means lower surface air pressure.

Still no evidence to the contrary?

No, a warmer Earth atmosphere would result in higher surface air pressure. That's what your side claims, that Co2 in the atmosphere is warming the atmosphere....


never mind the ACTUAL DATA said JUST THE OPPOSITE until FUDGED in 2005....

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, a warmer Earth atmosphere would result in higher surface air pressure. That's what your side claims, that Co2 in the atmosphere is warming the atmosphere....


never mind the ACTUAL DATA said JUST THE OPPOSITE until FUDGED in 2005....

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

No, a warmer Earth atmosphere would result in higher surface air pressure.

You still have no source to back up this claim.

Why is that?

 

[EMH]

No, a warmer Earth atmosphere would result in higher surface air pressure.

You still have no source to back up this claim.

Why is that?

Don't need one. If the source is EMH, you haven't refuted one word from that source.... and you cannot refute this one either.... and your chosen ass is really pissed off about it...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Don't need one. If the source is EMH, you haven't refuted one word from that source.... and you cannot refute this one either.... and your chosen ass is really pissed off about it...

Prevailing Winds

Durr.

 

[EMH]

View attachment 1027334

Prevailing Winds

Durr.

That is hour by hour, day by day. If you compare year vs year, those variables are filtered out.

We are talking about a 70 year down trend.

Every time you and the rest of the Co2 FRAUD try to answer that with an hour by hour weather description, you prove you cannot refute the truth posted by EMH.... because if you could, you would.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That is hour by hour, day by day. If you compare year vs year, those variables are filtered out.

We are talking about a 70 year down trend.

Right, a 70-year trend of higher temperatures and lower surface air pressures.

 

[EMH]

Right, a 70-year trend of higher temperatures and lower surface air pressures.

Not a rational response.

Not only is there no increase in temperature, but there is no ongoing net ice melt.

 

[ding]

This is again a deliberate attempt to confuse day to day fluctuations with a 70 year down trend...

The Co2 FRAUD has to lie here, because if there was an ongoing net ice melt, Surface Air Pressure would be going up. It isn't.

AGW is a fraud, but so are you.

 

[ding]

And the endless cut and paste of fudged fraud from the employer, the Co2 FRAUD....

And when we look at the old photos which are not fudged, we see something completely different...

Indeed, since Greenland and AA have non stop ice cores back 20k years, you are asking people to believe that oceans rose while 97% of Earth ice grew too....

LOL!!

The IDIOCY of the Co2 FRAUD is absolutely breathtaking.....

Post your data.

 

[EMH]

AGW is a fraud, but so are you.

You are a big liar. You claim you believe AGW is a fraud, but you ACCEPT

1. clearly fudged data
2. unrealistic tectonic plate movement
3. absolutely laughable O isotope ratio = global temps nonsense
4. Milankovich
5. wild theories with NO DATA


You are a complete fraud. You are paid by the Co2 FRAUD as a "faux skeptic" who insists on accepting fudged data as real.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not a rational response.

Not only is there no increase in temperature, but there is no ongoing net ice melt.

Totally refuting your stupid claim is a very rational response.

 

[EMH]

Totally refuting your stupid claim is a very rational response.

Well, we do have Jurassic.... warmer, wetter, and higher surface air pressure....

there's warmer and higher surface air pressure together.... kinda refutes all the hourly bullshit you've been posting....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Well, we do have Jurassic.... warmer, wetter, and higher surface air pressure....

there's warmer and higher surface air pressure together.... kinda refutes all the hourly bullshit you've been posting....

Find some evidence that raising the temperature now will raise the surface air pressure now.

Unless you're just letting my refutation of your idiocy stand?