RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
All 2 does is state that some limitations exist within the scope of what is protected.For example the 2nd protects military style and type of weapons but not fully automatic weapons. The Court STATED in its ruling that the 2nd is an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT not associated with any requirement to belong to any militia. It did not however state that it was a right that did not have some limitations. Or are you claiming since we can not shout FIRE in a crowded theater and be protected by the 1st it is not an Individual right also?Paragraph (2) of DC v Heller.Prove your claim.People who think that the 2nd Amendment is absolute are people who logically think that child pornography is protected by freedom of the press.