So, Why Is It That Only Democrats Can Question Election Results?

Well, to counter, in 2016 when Trump won, Jill Stein asked for a recount in three swing states when she had absolutely no chance of winning. Those recounts should have never been done in the first place since she had no chance of winning. If Hillary wanted a recount then Hillary should have asked for a recount.
did you read his source???? it's obvious you didn't... democrats question the country election??? not our country but some other country ... what you didn't seem to understand in any of the states Trump said he won all had three times recounted for him ... where trump filed a lawsuit to stop all mail-in ballots being counted because they were fake ballots he said ...he lost that suit in every state he sued ... where do you see any democrat stopping him asking for a recount ... you don't so your point here is ridiculous ... as For Jill Stein she, like trump, feels she was cheated ...she, like trump, has a right to have the votes recounted... whether you feel she hasn't a chance or not isn't your choice ... both got their recounts ...both lost their election ... if you don't like it tuff it's their right to ask for a recount ...and the got them ... in trumps case he wanted mail-in ballots to not be counted
 
Last edited:
Yeah crooked since 2016..
Awwwww, teabaggers just can't PROVE it.

Nice deflection trying to jump ahead in order to discount what the Democrat's were doing, and what their agenda called for.
Stop listening to FOX.
Keeping what we sow eh ? You an advocate for assassination attempts based on politics ?
We aren't the ones sending death threats to anyone that questions, your dear leader
Are you one of those advocates for killing innocent cop's for political retribution based on lies ?

Do tell....
More projection.

1722681352014.png
 
Every time they don't get the result they want, they question the election results. But, Republicans aren't allowed to question election results or they are accused of being insurrectionists.


Sweeping generalized statement have no meaning whatsoever.

Democrats question the results when there is evidence of fraud. Absent EVIDENCE, they don't question the results.

In 2020, there was absolutely no evidence of fraud. Trump simply refused to accept the results. When Trump told the US press that he thought the courts would be deciding the election, every Secretary of State in the Union was warned that their results had better be able to withstand court scrutiny.

No one wanted the embarassment of having their state's results to be thrown out so those running the elections took extra care with the results, to ensure they would stand up in court. And they did.

Russia interfered in the 2016 elections, and Trump's campaign staff plead guilty to passing Republican polling data to Russians, among other charges. Junior was meeting with Russian government lawyers in Trump Tower to get help smearing Hillary Clinton, so don't say that Trump didn't "collude" with Russia.

These days, Republicans are parroting Russian and Chinese propaganda about the Bidens. Putin and Xi seem to be totally unprepared to smear Harris. And Trump has simply lost his mind.
 
Well, to counter, in 2016 when Trump won, Jill Stein asked for a recount in three swing states when she had absolutely no chance of winning. Those recounts should have never been done in the first place since she had no chance of winning. If Hillary wanted a recount then Hillary should have asked for a recount.

Any candidate can ask for a recount, and they have to pay for that request. ALL recounts that are legally requested should be conducted, regardless of whether the candidate making the request has a chance of winning or not.

As always, you want rights for your side but not for anyone else.
 
Yeah crooked since 2016.. Nice deflection trying to jump ahead in order to discount what the Democrat's were doing, and what their agenda called for.

Keeping what we sow eh ? You an advocate for assassination attempts based on politics ? Are you one of those advocates for killing innocent cop's for political retribution based on lies ?

Do tell....

Do you have anything not based on Trump's lies, and FOX News slanders????? FOX New has paid out over $1 billion in judgements ordered by the courts for their lies to the American people. And still you believe them.

Do tell......
 
Do you have anything not based on Trump's lies, and FOX News slanders?????
No, he doesn't.
FOX New has paid out over $1 billion in judgements ordered by the courts for their lies to the American people. And still you believe them.

Do tell......
These people are..............

News Hounds: We watch FOX so you don't have to.​

View attachment 989234
NewsHounds
https://www.newshounds.us › contact
We watch FOX so you don't have to. Email us at: [email protected] · Buy MoveOn: The Movie · Best in Show Kirsten Powers is Best In Show. Sean Hannity is in ...
 
Sweeping generalized statement have no meaning whatsoever.

Democrats question the results when there is evidence of fraud. Absent EVIDENCE, they don't question the results.

In 2020, there was absolutely no evidence of fraud. Trump simply refused to accept the results. When Trump told the US press that he thought the courts would be deciding the election, every Secretary of State in the Union was warned that their results had better be able to withstand court scrutiny.

No one wanted the embarassment of having their state's results to be thrown out so those running the elections took extra care with the results, to ensure they would stand up in court. And they did.

Russia interfered in the 2016 elections, and Trump's campaign staff plead guilty to passing Republican polling data to Russians, among other charges. Junior was meeting with Russian government lawyers in Trump Tower to get help smearing Hillary Clinton, so don't say that Trump didn't "collude" with Russia.

These days, Republicans are parroting Russian and Chinese propaganda about the Bidens. Putin and Xi seem to be totally unprepared to smear Harris. And Trump has simply lost his mind.
they just don't want to accept it ...
 
the mandate as you call it was all employees of the government must have a COVID-19 vaccine to work in a federal facility ... just because you are too stupid to understand why doesn't make him a dictator ... you do say the most moronic things ...there was a choice get a shot or leave your job ... it's that simple ...a dictator would say get the shot or we will force you to get one then hold them down and give them a shot ... they wouldn't give you any choice ... is the Tennice organization a dictator ... they said to get shot or you can't play ... Austrailia said for you to enter our country you must have proof you had a covid 19 shot ... many countries have done this ... no shot no entry does that make Australia and all of the other countries run by a dictator??? didn't I say that you moron ???? Biden gave them a choice and I for one would want a person working with me not vaccinated ...
Nice run on rant that basically says absolutely nothing Mr. NEFARIOUS Character.

I believe that you leftist are the world's greatest spin masters. You will attempt to spin everything along with anything if need be for some sort of political outcomes.

A choice eh ? Yeah either take the shot or don't eat among other things affected, and it was all because you leftist were going to leverage the citizen's ability to buy and sell goods along with other services needed if they didn't take the shot right ??

So if they refused, then basically they would be fired when you made them leave THEIR JOB'S if they refused to take the shot right ??.........

For example, if you don't take this shot that is now proven to have little to no defense against the virus (i.e. just take it to make other's FEEL SAFE or better yet take it in order to not make other's feel weird because they ran out and took a shot immediately), so for those who wouldn't take it, well they will be terminated for not getting in line right ?

Monoclonal anti-bodies and other types of treatments were saving the population from total disaster at the time, and then came the shots that millions refused to take, and most if not all are still here to date even though they were basically told that they wouldn't be if they didn't take the shot. They were being told this by people who didn't know chit at the time, but they just better fall in line eh ??
Awwwww, teabaggers just can't PROVE it.


Stop listening to FOX.

We aren't the ones sending death threats to anyone that questions, your dear leader

More projection.

View attachment 989179
Yes there are death threats probably flowing from both sides of the radical spectrums out there I'm guessing, but the actual attempts at it are two very different things, now explain Butler PA for us.

So far the alledged cover up has been epic, otherwise if this is what it all boils down too.

A person on a radio talk show asked the question the other day, and this is what he
asked - - so how does a 20 year old outsmart an agency with a billion dollar budget, and outsmart all of it's so called safety protocol's that are supposed to be in place along with it's guide by history, and a supreme rigorous training to boot ???

As a secondary thought, how does Epstein get taken out in a prison cell ???

Now back to Trump's unique situation in PA.

I thought to myself that the only answer most rational minded people would say, is that it's because they let him (the shooter), get away with it, otherwise SS standing down or being somehow confused in a way that (allowed such a situation to take place), is very suspect in many people's minds today.

People just have questions, and they need transparency and the investigation to be fair and honest is all. The truth needs to come out in order to solve maybe more than just that issue alone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top