President Trump agrees to debate Harris on FOX News on September 4

[shockedcanadian]

If the OP story about Trump offering to debate on his terms is true, and I saw no authentication so far this morning in the various newsfeeds I scan.*

But, if it is true that DonTrump has unilaterally offered to debate with the rules he establishes....well, if I was Harris, I'd counter-offer. Test his intentions and his sincerity, and his confidence.

I'm OK with the rules of the previous debate between President Biden & DonTrump. Which means, microphone control by moderators, no live audience, and jointly agreed upon moderators.
*Speaking of newsfeeds, the only reference I saw to a 'debate' was this in The Hill. Here's a snippet:

"He listened to a recent clip of Trump, where the GOP nominee for president questioned why he should debate Harris if he is “leading in the polls” — the same argument he used when sitting out the Republican primary debates earlier in the cycle — and said voters already know who each of the candidates are.

“I got one word for that: Wuss,” Conway said. “He is a wuss. He is scared of her. She will run circles around him, and he knows that.”

With Democrats coalescing around Harris after President Biden bowed out of the race last month, the pressure is on for Trump to debate the vice president.

Harris has agreed to debate the former president and has accused Trump of “backpedaling.”

Trump agreed to everything the Dems wanted the for the first debate. Now Trump is the only elected candidate according to the American People who voted for him in the Primary so he should set the terms.

 

[JGalt]

If the OP story about Trump offering to debate on his terms is true, and I saw no authentication so far this morning in the various newsfeeds I scan.*

But, if it is true that DonTrump has unilaterally offered to debate with the rules he establishes....well, if I was Harris, I'd counter-offer. Test his intentions and his sincerity, and his confidence.

I'm OK with the rules of the previous debate between President Biden & DonTrump. Which means, microphone control by moderators, no live audience, and jointly agreed upon moderators.
*Speaking of newsfeeds, the only reference I saw to a 'debate' was this in The Hill. Here's a snippet:

"He listened to a recent clip of Trump, where the GOP nominee for president questioned why he should debate Harris if he is “leading in the polls” — the same argument he used when sitting out the Republican primary debates earlier in the cycle — and said voters already know who each of the candidates are.

“I got one word for that: Wuss,” Conway said. “He is a wuss. He is scared of her. She will run circles around him, and he knows that.”

With Democrats coalescing around Harris after President Biden bowed out of the race last month, the pressure is on for Trump to debate the vice president.

Harris has agreed to debate the former president and has accused Trump of “backpedaling.”

FOX News on the AM radio did cover the story this morning, Newsmax also mentioned it.

 

[22lcidw]

Hannity, Watters and Ingraham would be better choices as moderators to start to even things up for the endless questionale ones. I figured it was not going to happen. Press these two moderators to not lean Prog.

 

[YoursTruly]

Let's get this Harris nomination thing straight.

The DNC is giving her the nomination because:

1. They know that no matter who they run this late in the game, they're not going to win the presidency.
2. She's a thorn in the DNC's side, because no matter how bad she is, she's still a woman of color(s)
3. She's the VP. Which puts her next in line with the throne.

The could get around the gender issue, the race issue or the VP issue. But they can't get around all three wrapped up in one person. The democrats shoving a woman out of the way for a man who's better in front of the mic, they could do. But she would have to be a white women. Not a woman of color. And especially not the VP. Not in this day and time, with all the DEI crap the democrats have been pushing for the last 6 to 8 years.

She's a bad DEI pick, and the DNC knows it. And no matter how awesome they try to portray her, she's still not going to win.

 

[kyzr]

But the Left has won the culture wars, making it unthinkable to many to vote for a party that does not embrace gender theory or socialism.
There is a price to pay for surrendering academia and the media to the Left.
My guess is Kamala will bait Trump with race questions and pound him with "He's a felon!!!"

Trump did just fine sparring with that ABC lady at the black journalist forum.

He asked her to define DEI and she just kept saying what the 3 words were.

I wonder if FOX will ask Kamala what DEI means?

What a "woman" is?

What "National Security" means regarding border security?