lawfulrevolt
Lawfulrevolt
- Feb 6, 2012
- 57
- 5
- Thread starter
- #21
Makes a helluva lot more sense than all the CON birther stuff they've floated over the years.
Yea, that's kind of a muddy issue. It was distressing to see Col. Terence Lakin deprived of his right to witness and subpoena at court martial by the military judge. The one absolute right a soldier has there is witness and evidence. He had subpoenaed the absolute ultimate records to prove he was not disobeying a lawful order and he was deprived of his right. Military judge Col. Denise R Lind has some explaining to do.
That makes me sick. Soldiers fight for rights, but cannot get them from the military courts over them. Oh man . . deprived of facts that concern us all, with nothing but rhetoric in the social scene opposing it.
http://soldiersforjusticeandpeace.c...denied-ltc-terry-lakin-constitutional-rights/
At this point, the birther issue is gone, WHAT IS UP is with the military courts and constitutional rights that the UCMJ specifically grant in that situation? Are we too stupid to understand simple words?
This is very likely an act of concealing treason. Lakins test was a very high test and the courts failed. Let me repeat that The courts failed and look at the supremes with "citizens united". How much are we going to allow before we simply say with one voice, "we need our first and last right, Article V"?
Citizens need to unify and demand that courts function and file suits in civil courts against usurpers of rights and defend soldiers. All those that have taken the oath must work with citizens who are willing, in defense of the constitution.
Last edited: