that would be your opinion. I have a reasonably good understanding of economics, based on an econ degree and a whole lot of study. But, it is amusing to hear a dish washer telling me I do not understand the subject.So, oldstyle is at it again. He says:
And I love the fact that the board's resident Tommy Flanagan is back trying to post intelligently about economics! You gotta admire the little guy's chutzpa. It takes nerve to pretend to be an authority on a subject you know nothing about.
Then, Oldstyle said:
He took a little leave of absence after declaring that he was an executive at BP while folks were discussing energy policy. I think even Rshermr knew he was a little "over the top" on that lie.
And that would be a bald faced lie. Which is nothing new for oldstyle. I never in my life said I was an executive at BP. I never worked for them. I did work with execs at BP, in a position with a vendor selling to them. But I never in my life worked for them. Now, maybe if you disagree, you would like to provide some proof. But of course, you can not, because you are lying. Again. As you are wont to do.
Relative to a leave of absence, that would be none of your business. I am retired, and often get away from posting here. Sorry you have a problem with that.
You're the biggest bullshit artist on this board, dude! When the discussion was about economics you claimed to have taught economics in college as an undergrad! Then when the discussion was about energy you claimed to have been an executive with BP.
Gee, if the subject becomes Nukes will you next claim to have been working side by side with Fermi and Oppenheimer on the Manhattan Project? Or if it's space exploration will you claim to have been an astronaut for NASA?