No they don't.
A man can marry a woman, but a woman cannot marry a woman. If they had equal rights then a man or a woman could then Civilly Marry a woman (who agreed of course).
Your argument failed when it was used for race and the logic fails when you try to use it for gender.
>>>>
But all men are the same in this, as are all women.
No their not. A man can marry a woman, but a woman cannot marry another woman. Different treatment based on gender.
Let us know when sheep and goats can give informed consent and enter into legal contracts.
Not discredited at all. Women deserve the same rights as men. A man can Civilly Marry a woman and that is denied to women.
Loving established that the government must have a compelling government interest when attempting to discriminate against someone based on a biological condition and that invidious laws were unconstitutional. Last I checked gender was a biological condition.
Sure there is.
Heterosexual Man + Heterosexual Woman = Legal
Heterosexual Man + Homosexual Woman = Legal
Homosexual Man + Heterosexual Woman = Legal
Homosexual Man + Homosexual Woman = Legal
Heterosexual Man + Heterosexual Man = Illegal
Heterosexual Man + Homosexual Man = Illegal
Homosexual Man + Homosexual Man = Illegal
Heterosexual Woman + Heterosexual Woman = Illegal
Heterosexual Woman + Homosexual Woman = Illegal
Homosexual Woman + Homosexual Woman = Illegal
The discriminating condition in the above is gender.
All women have an equal right to marry. All men have an equal right to marry. Thus no discrimination.
Same logic presented in Loving. A colored can marry a colored and a white can marry a white.
Didn't hold water then either.
Again, you fail. And since it is for all the same reasons you've failed at failing.
Prior to 2004 there were zero legal entities in the United States that provided for Same-sex Civil Marriage and polls showed it was well supported.
In 2012 there are now 8 legal entities authorizing same-sex Civil Marriage and polls show that now a majority of Americans support equal treatment under Civil Marriage laws for same-sex couples.
No fail here.
>>>>
Repeating the same argument isn't proof of anything, except that you are out of arguments.
Women are not discriminated against because they are not men.
And again the only proofs you can offer are:
1) it's just like the civil rights movement (which it isnt)
2) Our side is winning (which is why it's been voted down in every referendum)