Incorrect.
We are a Republic, not a democracy each citizen is subject only to the rule of law, not men. The rule of law states that every citizen will be allowed equal access to all his states laws, regardless the majority opinion. And that includes marriage laws.
.
You seem to be arguing two points. Or you don't understand mine. Or something.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
First point: if states want to vote in gay marriage, that's their business. It was put to a vote and gay marriage won or lost or whatever but that's the will of the people, so fine. But I dont want unelected unaccountable judges making decisions that thwart elections.
Second point: no one is being denied any access that anyone else has. Gay men have the same rights to marry that straight men do. A nd vice versa. No one has shown a single right that can apply to one and not the other.
Probably because there is no definition of gay. Leonard Bernstein was married for many years and had children. As his wife was dying he decided to divorce her and run off with his gay lover. Is he now suddenly gay? Was he gay before and just pretending? Could he have married his gay lover even if he was really straight? Would he have to prove that he enjoyed butt-seks to get a license?
Gays seek special treatment, not equal treatment.