How Kaiser Health Found 88% Approve ObamaCare--Item By Item

Since The National Health Plan registrations are under way, and since so many are trying to get in line, the computers cannot keep up: Then taking a business approach to marketing surveys, Kaiser Health is able to show that ObamaCare has an 88% approval rate.

The truth is, Americans love Obamacare - latimes.com

Mostly, people like the provisions of the National Health Plan, but are unaware that they are the provisions of the national health care plan.

So with registrations under way, and with the provisions becoming clear, then the Republicans have taken the losing position, more or less relegating their innaugural parade to the level of OJ Simpson running away, all over the Freeways, of Los Angeles.

That is their brand!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Maybe all go to religious camp in forest. Drink poison Kool-Aid. . . .meant for death-visions! Maybe name their party after Rev. Jim Jones! Not too likely to name their party after Rev. Jeremiah Wright(?). . .After all(?)!)


You do know that the Federal Government created HMOs and PPOs to make healthcare more affordable. Kaiser Permanente became the main HMO supplier forcing the vast majority of its membership to join through unions. Is it really all that surprising Kaiser would try to boast any appearance of a government health care program success like Obamacare? The are the health care beneficiaries behind its success. No big shocker of a surprise there.

No, insurance companies created HMO's and PPO's to maximize their prophets. And ACA is written by insurance for insurance, it will not benefit you and me.
 
Americans will feel the pain of the ACA in time. Liz Fowler of the WellPoint Insurance Group wrote the foundation for this law. And it will prove to have been written with insurance companies in mind.

There is no doubt the insurance companies will benefit greatly from the ACA. That does not change the fact that the ACA is going to help reduce overall healthcare spending in the long run.
 
Since The National Health Plan registrations are under way, and since so many are trying to get in line, the computers cannot keep up: Then taking a business approach to marketing surveys, Kaiser Health is able to show that ObamaCare has an 88% approval rate.

The truth is, Americans love Obamacare - latimes.com

Read your link:
How can that be, when polls regularly show a plurality of respondents with an "unfavorable" view of Obamacare? (In a September (2013) Kaiser Family Foundation tracking poll, the difference was 43% unfavorable to 39% favorable.)

https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/800533/kff-slide-41-png.pdf

One question was asked.

Apples and oranges cannot be compared.

The writer is a freakin hack!
 
Americans will feel the pain of the ACA in time. Liz Fowler of the WellPoint Insurance Group wrote the foundation for this law. And it will prove to have been written with insurance companies in mind.

There is no doubt the insurance companies will benefit greatly from the ACA. That does not change the fact that the ACA is going to help reduce overall healthcare spending in the long run.

That isn't a "fact" until it happens!
 
Since The National Health Plan registrations are under way, and since so many are trying to get in line, the computers cannot keep up: Then taking a business approach to marketing surveys, Kaiser Health is able to show that ObamaCare has an 88% approval rate.

The truth is, Americans love Obamacare - latimes.com

Mostly, people like the provisions of the National Health Plan, but are unaware that they are the provisions of the national health care plan.

So with registrations under way, and with the provisions becoming clear, then the Republicans have taken the losing position, more or less relegating their innaugural parade to the level of OJ Simpson running away, all over the Freeways, of Los Angeles.

That is their brand!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Maybe all go to religious camp in forest. Drink poison Kool-Aid. . . .meant for death-visions! Maybe name their party after Rev. Jim Jones! Not too likely to name their party after Rev. Jeremiah Wright(?). . .After all(?)!)


You do know that the Federal Government created HMOs and PPOs to make healthcare more affordable. Kaiser Permanente became the main HMO supplier forcing the vast majority of its membership to join through unions. Is it really all that surprising Kaiser would try to boast any appearance of a government health care program success like Obamacare? The are the health care beneficiaries behind its success. No big shocker of a surprise there.

No, insurance companies created HMO's and PPO's to maximize their prophets. And ACA is written by insurance for insurance, it will not benefit you and me.

Here is a little information concerning HMOs as it relates to healthcare, and Kaiser Permanente WAS the major HMO supplier, as history shows.

From their beginnings, HMOs were designed–by Democrats and Republicans–to eliminate individual health insurance. The result is a vast network of health care collectives (HMOs, PPOs, Point-of-Service plans) created by government that are destined to do harm to individuals.

The individual was first discouraged from buying insurance in 1942 when employee health premiums were made tax deductible to employers–not to individuals. Congress created Medicare in 1965, making individual insurance for those over 65 obsolete. Subsidized, unrestricted health care for seniors lead to an unprecedented frenzy of spending by patients and doctors.

Costs went up, introducing an economic obstacle to individual health insurance. As costs rose, those on the New Left, including then freshman Sen. Ted Kennedy, argued that government ought to pay for everyone’s health care and promoted the idea of a health maintenance organization, a term coined by a left-wing college professor.

President Nixon appeased the left and proposed the HMO Act, which Congress passed in 1973. The law created new, supposedly cheaper health coverage with millions of dollars to HMOs, which, until then, constituted a small portion of the market. Kaiser Permanente was the only major HMO in the country by 1969 and most of its members were compelled to join through unions.

History of HMO's and Healthcare Timeline

HMOs were based on the model pioneered by health organizations like the for-profit Kaiser Permanente in California and non-profit Group Health in Washington State, which offered medical care on a pre-paid basis.

History News Network | HNN's History of Healthcare Reform
 
Since The National Health Plan registrations are under way, and since so many are trying to get in line, the computers cannot keep up: Then taking a business approach to marketing surveys, Kaiser Health is able to show that ObamaCare has an 88% approval rate.

The truth is, Americans love Obamacare - latimes.com

Mostly, people like the provisions of the National Health Plan, but are unaware that they are the provisions of the national health care plan.

So with registrations under way, and with the provisions becoming clear, then the Republicans have taken the losing position, more or less relegating their innaugural parade to the level of OJ Simpson running away, all over the Freeways, of Los Angeles.

That is their brand!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Maybe all go to religious camp in forest. Drink poison Kool-Aid. . . .meant for death-visions! Maybe name their party after Rev. Jim Jones! Not too likely to name their party after Rev. Jeremiah Wright(?). . .After all(?)!)


You do know that the Federal Government created HMOs and PPOs to make healthcare more affordable. Kaiser Permanente became the main HMO supplier forcing the vast majority of its membership to join through unions. Is it really all that surprising Kaiser would try to boast any appearance of a government health care program success like Obamacare? The are the health care beneficiaries behind its success. No big shocker of a surprise there.

Where I work is non-union, and we have premium Kaiser. It has been a very good policy for my wife and I. At present, I have Kaiser as a supplement for MediCare, and my wife has full Kaiser. You flap-yap about things you don't even have the slightest knowledge of. Typical for a 'Conservative'.
 
Kaiser is in Calf. enough said

California's economy is the 12th largest economy in the world (2012)

Nuff Said.

And also holds the most Democraps , Enough said

Exactly. Democratic policies create wealth for all, present GOP policies destroy wealth for 90% of Americans in order to transfer that wealth to the upper 1%.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMhvYeQPOcE]Wealth Distribution in the USA - SHOCKING! - YouTube[/ame]
 
California's economy is the 12th largest economy in the world (2012)

Nuff Said.

And also holds the most Democraps , Enough said

Exactly. Democratic policies create wealth for all, present GOP policies destroy wealth for 90% of Americans in order to transfer that wealth to the upper 1%.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMhvYeQPOcE]Wealth Distribution in the USA - SHOCKING! - YouTube[/ame]

thats funny Rocks....here in "Republican Heavy" Orange County<<<coined by Truth Matters.....the UE is 2-3 points lower than the State and most of California....you do realize Rocks that Cals. UE rate is one of the highest in the Country....right?....
 
You do know that the Federal Government created HMOs and PPOs to make healthcare more affordable. Kaiser Permanente became the main HMO supplier forcing the vast majority of its membership to join through unions. Is it really all that surprising Kaiser would try to boast any appearance of a government health care program success like Obamacare? The are the health care beneficiaries behind its success. No big shocker of a surprise there.

No, insurance companies created HMO's and PPO's to maximize their prophets. And ACA is written by insurance for insurance, it will not benefit you and me.

Here is a little information concerning HMOs as it relates to healthcare, and Kaiser Permanente WAS the major HMO supplier, as history shows.

From their beginnings, HMOs were designed&#8211;by Democrats and Republicans&#8211;to eliminate individual health insurance. The result is a vast network of health care collectives (HMOs, PPOs, Point-of-Service plans) created by government that are destined to do harm to individuals.

The individual was first discouraged from buying insurance in 1942 when employee health premiums were made tax deductible to employers&#8211;not to individuals. Congress created Medicare in 1965, making individual insurance for those over 65 obsolete. Subsidized, unrestricted health care for seniors lead to an unprecedented frenzy of spending by patients and doctors.

Costs went up, introducing an economic obstacle to individual health insurance. As costs rose, those on the New Left, including then freshman Sen. Ted Kennedy, argued that government ought to pay for everyone&#8217;s health care and promoted the idea of a health maintenance organization, a term coined by a left-wing college professor.

President Nixon appeased the left and proposed the HMO Act, which Congress passed in 1973. The law created new, supposedly cheaper health coverage with millions of dollars to HMOs, which, until then, constituted a small portion of the market. Kaiser Permanente was the only major HMO in the country by 1969 and most of its members were compelled to join through unions.

History of HMO's and Healthcare Timeline

HMOs were based on the model pioneered by health organizations like the for-profit Kaiser Permanente in California and non-profit Group Health in Washington State, which offered medical care on a pre-paid basis.

History News Network | HNN's History of Healthcare Reform

And here's a little bit more information. It was Edgar Kaiser, president Nixons friend that influenced the promotion of HMO' and the subsequent 1973 act.

Though some forms of group "managed care" did exist prior to the 1970s, they came about chiefly through the influence of U.S. President Richard Nixon and his friend Edgar Kaiser. In discussion in the White House on February 17, 1971, Nixon expressed his support for the essential philosophy of the HMO, which John Ehrlichman explained thus: "All the incentives are toward less medical care, because the less care they give them, the more money they make."


It always has and always will be about maximising prophets for the insurance industry. At least that is, if and when we ever get a true single payer system. Most people are supporting something they know truly little about.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top