How much more democrat hypocrisy will the US take?

[Marener]

that’s a lie


but Gore tried to get the courts to throw them out in 2000…military voters who clinton had sent over seas

It’s on tape.

FULL AUDIO: Call between President Trump, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on election

Channel 2 Action News investigator reporter Justin Gray has independently obtained the full recording of a phone call between President Donald Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in which the president pressured him to overturn the election results.

www.wsbtv.com

I have no problem with filing lawsuits. That’s how the system is supposed to work. Oddly enough Gore’s attempt to throw out these military votes was an attempt to get Florida counties to follow the letter of the law. Illegal votes likely decided the election in 2000.

https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/ballots.pdf

The Times reporters described the details of the Bush campaign effort to secure victory by pressuring selected local election officials to count invalid overseas absentee ballots in Florida. In particular,
Republicans focused on military ballots and counties where Bush had his strongest voting base. For example, in counties such as Escambia and Santa Rosa, Bush lawyers argued that every vote cast by Americans in uniform should be counted, regardless of the letter of the law. In Democratic counties, Bush’s lawyers argued exactly the opposite—that local election officials must follow the letter of the law and disqualify any ballot not meeting the rules.

According to the Times, this unequal pressure led to unequal treatment by local officials of overseas voters. That partisans would pursue their interests creatively, relentlessly, and even inconsistently in different places is neither a novel claim nor remotely illegal. That local election officials would respond to this pressure by treating voters unequally is, however, a more serious claim. The Times’ view—“the result was unequal treat- ment of ballots with the same flaws”—contradicts statements by Katherine Harris that the rules were applied uniformly.7 It also would seem to violate the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which was part of the stated grounds under which the United States Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore stopped the manual recounts.

 

[struth]

It’s on tape.

FULL AUDIO: Call between President Trump, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on election

Channel 2 Action News investigator reporter Justin Gray has independently obtained the full recording of a phone call between President Donald Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in which the president pressured him to overturn the election results.

www.wsbtv.com

I have no problem with filing lawsuits. That’s how the system is supposed to work. Oddly enough Gore’s attempt to throw out these military votes was an attempt to get Florida counties to follow the letter of the law. Illegal votes likely decided the election in 2000.

https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/ballots.pdf

The Times reporters described the details of the Bush campaign effort to secure victory by pressuring selected local election officials to count invalid overseas absentee ballots in Florida. In particular,
Republicans focused on military ballots and counties where Bush had his strongest voting base. For example, in counties such as Escambia and Santa Rosa, Bush lawyers argued that every vote cast by Americans in uniform should be counted, regardless of the letter of the law. In Democratic counties, Bush’s lawyers argued exactly the opposite—that local election officials must follow the letter of the law and disqualify any ballot not meeting the rules.

According to the Times, this unequal pressure led to unequal treatment by local officials of overseas voters. That partisans would pursue their interests creatively, relentlessly, and even inconsistently in different places is neither a novel claim nor remotely illegal. That local election officials would respond to this pressure by treating voters unequally is, however, a more serious claim. The Times’ view—“the result was unequal treat- ment of ballots with the same flaws”—contradicts statements by Katherine Harris that the rules were applied uniformly.7 It also would seem to violate the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which was part of the stated grounds under which the United States Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore stopped the manual recounts.

yeah and it doesn’t say what you claim. The transcript literally undermines your claim.

I am sure many if not all people running for office have discussed how many votes they need…that’s not uncommon…what is uncommon is dems like Gore trying to toss out military votes, or folks like clinton and obama spying on a campaign and pay jv for russian propaganda to undermine the results of an election…that’s just stalinist tactics and a clear and present threat to the republic

 

[Marener]

yeah and it doesn’t say what you claim. The transcript literally undermines your claim.

I am sure many if not all people running for office have discussed how many votes they need…that’s not uncommon…what is uncommon is dems like Gore trying to toss out military votes, or folks like clinton and obama spying on a campaign and pay jv for russian propaganda to undermine the results of an election…that’s just stalinist tactics and a clear and present threat to the republic

The transcript says exactly what I claimed. Show me where any Dem has called a SoS and asked them to toss votes so they could win.

AFTER the election.

 

[Godboy]

What is your prediction about the House and the Senate?

I predict that democrats do terribly. Whats YOUR prediction. Lets get you on record now, before you can lie about it later.

 

[struth]

The transcript says exactly what I claimed. Show me where any Dem has called a SoS and asked them to toss votes so they could win.

AFTER the election.

no actually it doesn’t…it says what i said, while the vote count was going on

Gore did in 2000…he tried to get the votes of military that his admin sent overseas, tossed

 

[Marener]

no actually it doesn’t…it says what i said, while the vote count was going on

Gore did in 2000…he tried to get the votes of military that his admin sent overseas, tossed

Trump to Raffensperger:
“I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state,”

This was Jan 2nd. The election was over. The counting was over. The safe harbor day for certifying the election was a month prior. The electors had certified their votes two and a half weeks prior.

You are a liar.

 

[struth]

Trump to Raffensperger:
“I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state,”

This was Jan 2nd. The election was over. The counting was over. The safe harbor day for certifying the election was a month prior. The electors had certified their votes two and a half weeks prior.

You are a liar.

yeah that’s how many more votes he needed to win…if you aren’t counting votes and don’t know the numbers to win you shouldn’t run for office…

 

[Marener]

yeah that’s how many more votes he needed to win…if you aren’t counting votes and don’t know the numbers to win you shouldn’t run for office…

The election was over.

I’m still waiting for the Dem who called a SOS to persuade them to throwing out votes so they’d win.

 

[struth]

The election was over.

I’m still waiting for the Dem who called a SOS to persuade them to throwing out votes so they’d win.

nah recounts were still going on

i have repeatedly told you Gore in 2000

 

[Marener]

nah recounts were still going on

i have repeatedly told you Gore in 2000

Gore never called Harris to throw out votes for him.

There were no recounts going on. The election was over. It was certified. Elector votes had been sent.

You are wrong on both points.

 

[Lisa558]

It’s not. It’s right wing propaganda. It’s only well written in that is provided a compelling alternate reality for right wingers to live in.

They make it’s sound like Trump’s actions “challenging” the election had precedent. They don’t. No democrat has ever attempted to do what Trump did after the 2020 election.

To you, anything that dissents from the liberal agenda is “right-wing propaganda.” If you really want to know what propaganda is, turn on MSNBC.

When the country votes for a Republican Congress to at least limit the damage being done by the Dem-Marxists, will you finally acknowledge that Americans don’t want what your side is selling?

Tick-toc. One month until we stop the destruction of America.

 

[candycorn]

I predict that democrats do terribly. Whats YOUR prediction. Lets get you on record now, before you can lie about it later.

The GOP captures the House--between 225 and 230 seats.

The Dems hold the Senate, 52-48.

 

[candycorn]

The GOP captures the House--between 225 and 230 seats.

The Dems hold the Senate, 52-48.

Godboy Your turn to go on the record. How do you think it will shake out?

 

[scruffy]

what fragile democracy there is, Trump is helping to destroy.

BULLSHIT

The only ones destroying any democracy around here are the fucktards cheating on elections and violating the Constitution on a daily basis

 

[Marener]

To you, anything that dissents from the liberal agenda is “right-wing propaganda.” If you really want to know what propaganda is, turn on MSNBC.

When the country votes for a Republican Congress to at least limit the damage being done by the Dem-Marxists, will you finally acknowledge that Americans don’t want what your side is selling?

Tick-toc. One month until we stop the destruction of America.

I call it propaganda because it is so heavily biased and takes so much effort to deliberately rewrite history. My example was that no Dem has ever done what Trump had done after the election in 2020. It’s completely unprecedented yet this propaganda piece wants us to believe that it’s just hypocrisy that we call out Trump’s assault on our electoral system. They rewrite history to whitewash Trump’s actions and efforts.

Incumbent parties often lose seats. I’m not too concerned.

The extent of gerrymandering is likely to give you a misconception of your own popularity. Republicans are a minority of the country who have an exaggerated amount of power compared to their own popularity.

For example, Trump was never very popular but you wouldn’t know that talking to his most devout supporters. Do you acknowledge that Americans didn’t want Trump?

 

[scruffy]

Sure they can. When they are not partying with pedophiles, bragging about grabbing women by the pussy, paying porn stars for sec and saying they want to drill their own daughter.

a leftard moralist ^^^

lmao

 

[candycorn]

hahah

trump raised five wonderful kids with his wives…all have great careers and none are crack heads and about to be indicted for being tax cheats

Like their father...they picked the right rich daddy.

somewhere the dems went wrong

Biden's kid served in the military.... why didn't Trump's kids?

 

[candycorn]

Cheating on your pregnant wife isn’t very Christian.

Neither is paying a porn star for sex. But that is what passes for GOP family values these days.

 

[candycorn]

a leftard moralist ^^^

lmao

Your surrender is accepted. You put up a good fight for someone so historically outgunned and outclassed. Go cry in your bong for a while and try to muster a comeback later on squirt.

 

[struth]

Like their father...they picked the right rich daddy.

Biden's kid served in the military.... why didn't Trump's kids?

1) how does a kid pick their father?
2) Hunter was kicked out...is that something to really brag about?