Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would remind people that in the last USSC casing involving the ACA, Roberts did not say the ACA was Constitutional. In fact, he eluded to the fact that it is NOT Constitutional, but he rejected declaring it Un-Constitutional based on THE NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT WOULD BE HURT IF IT WAS SUDDENLY RULED UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.
THIS goes against what USSC Justices are supposed to rule. They are to answer 1 question: Is it Constitutional or not?
Whether that finding makes life hard for anyone or not is NOT their concern. Ruling the ACA is Un-Constitutional, which should have been done, WILL make life suck a little more until a new health care plan is adopted, but BARRY and the Democrats are responsible for that. THEY are the ones who destroyed the existing system and forced the minority-supported ACA down the throats of the majority who opposed it.
Instead of ruling ti Un-Constitutional he voted with the Liberals and stated Congress / the President will have to strengthen their argument / case and RESUBMITT.
In doing so, Roberts ruled on emotion (concern/sympathy for the people, not based on the Constitution). He left the door open for another challenge in the future.
Cramming Obamacare through over the objections of the American people resulted in the biggest Dem loss at the polls in nearly 100 years.
AND Roberts like many many others NEVER ever looked at the reality of how many people are INSURED!I would remind people that in the last USSC casing involving the ACA, Roberts did not say the ACA was Constitutional. In fact, he eluded to the fact that it is NOT Constitutional, but he rejected declaring it Un-Constitutional based on THE NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT WOULD BE HURT IF IT WAS SUDDENLY RULED UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.
THIS goes against what USSC Justices are supposed to rule. They are to answer 1 question: Is it Constitutional or not?
Whether that finding makes life hard for anyone or not is NOT their concern. Ruling the ACA is Un-Constitutional, which should have been done, WILL make life suck a little more until a new health care plan is adopted, but BARRY and the Democrats are responsible for that. THEY are the ones who destroyed the existing system and forced the minority-supported ACA down the throats of the majority who opposed it.
Instead of ruling ti Un-Constitutional he voted with the Liberals and stated Congress / the President will have to strengthen their argument / case and RESUBMITT.
In doing so, Roberts ruled on emotion (concern/sympathy for the people, not based on the Constitution). He left the door open for another challenge in the future.
How many people are insured or not has no bearing on whether the ACA is Constitutional or not.AND Roberts like many many others NEVER ever looked at the reality of how many people are INSURED!I would remind people that in the last USSC casing involving the ACA, Roberts did not say the ACA was Constitutional. In fact, he eluded to the fact that it is NOT Constitutional, but he rejected declaring it Un-Constitutional based on THE NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT WOULD BE HURT IF IT WAS SUDDENLY RULED UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.
THIS goes against what USSC Justices are supposed to rule. They are to answer 1 question: Is it Constitutional or not?
Whether that finding makes life hard for anyone or not is NOT their concern. Ruling the ACA is Un-Constitutional, which should have been done, WILL make life suck a little more until a new health care plan is adopted, but BARRY and the Democrats are responsible for that. THEY are the ones who destroyed the existing system and forced the minority-supported ACA down the throats of the majority who opposed it.
Instead of ruling ti Un-Constitutional he voted with the Liberals and stated Congress / the President will have to strengthen their argument / case and RESUBMITT.
In doing so, Roberts ruled on emotion (concern/sympathy for the people, not based on the Constitution). He left the door open for another challenge in the future.
Totally ignorance on his part and frankly all the MSM keep repeating Obama's gross lie... 46 million uninsured Americans!
But there NEVER were 46 million uninsured!
If anyone with half a sense of logic looked at the attached, they would comprehend that was a LIE!
I just wish more people would understand what this 46 million LIE did and that only 7 members of the HOUSE was the difference in the vote!
Not only did Obama INCLUDE 10 million illegals which Politifact called "sloppy" by Obama to include BUT the architect of ACA Gruber said it took the stupidity of the voter to pass ACA! Gruber went on to PROVE what FACT 2 was saying that 14 million Americans all need to do BEFORE ACA was sign up for Medicaid!
Finally the FACT 3 points out that 18 million people UNDER age 34 making over $50k/year didn't WANT to spend for health insurance from their EMPLOYER because they had no need! I don't know for a FACT that some of these 18 million might have HAD private insurance that was cheaper than their employer insurance but that was a possibility! But no one has investigated THAT possibility!
BUT regardless... to disrupt health care as Obamacare did and NOW today the idiot Dems Senators are continuing to raise that other gigantic falsehood "over half of all Americans have pre-existing conditions"!
HOW totally dishonest! FACTS!
156,199,800 HAVE employer health insurance
62,745,770 Medicare
76,070,000 Americans are enrolled in Medicaid .
12,000,000 military personnel received coverage
84,000,000 non-employer private health insurance
391,015,570 when you add the above together!
View attachment 401468CMS Fast Facts Mobile Site | CMS
www.cms.gov
I agree with regards to Constitutionality questions.How many people are insured or not has no bearing on whether the ACA is Constitutional or not.AND Roberts like many many others NEVER ever looked at the reality of how many people are INSURED!I would remind people that in the last USSC casing involving the ACA, Roberts did not say the ACA was Constitutional. In fact, he eluded to the fact that it is NOT Constitutional, but he rejected declaring it Un-Constitutional based on THE NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT WOULD BE HURT IF IT WAS SUDDENLY RULED UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.
THIS goes against what USSC Justices are supposed to rule. They are to answer 1 question: Is it Constitutional or not?
Whether that finding makes life hard for anyone or not is NOT their concern. Ruling the ACA is Un-Constitutional, which should have been done, WILL make life suck a little more until a new health care plan is adopted, but BARRY and the Democrats are responsible for that. THEY are the ones who destroyed the existing system and forced the minority-supported ACA down the throats of the majority who opposed it.
Instead of ruling ti Un-Constitutional he voted with the Liberals and stated Congress / the President will have to strengthen their argument / case and RESUBMITT.
In doing so, Roberts ruled on emotion (concern/sympathy for the people, not based on the Constitution). He left the door open for another challenge in the future.
Totally ignorance on his part and frankly all the MSM keep repeating Obama's gross lie... 46 million uninsured Americans!
But there NEVER were 46 million uninsured!
If anyone with half a sense of logic looked at the attached, they would comprehend that was a LIE!
I just wish more people would understand what this 46 million LIE did and that only 7 members of the HOUSE was the difference in the vote!
Not only did Obama INCLUDE 10 million illegals which Politifact called "sloppy" by Obama to include BUT the architect of ACA Gruber said it took the stupidity of the voter to pass ACA! Gruber went on to PROVE what FACT 2 was saying that 14 million Americans all need to do BEFORE ACA was sign up for Medicaid!
Finally the FACT 3 points out that 18 million people UNDER age 34 making over $50k/year didn't WANT to spend for health insurance from their EMPLOYER because they had no need! I don't know for a FACT that some of these 18 million might have HAD private insurance that was cheaper than their employer insurance but that was a possibility! But no one has investigated THAT possibility!
BUT regardless... to disrupt health care as Obamacare did and NOW today the idiot Dems Senators are continuing to raise that other gigantic falsehood "over half of all Americans have pre-existing conditions"!
HOW totally dishonest! FACTS!
156,199,800 HAVE employer health insurance
62,745,770 Medicare
76,070,000 Americans are enrolled in Medicaid .
12,000,000 military personnel received coverage
84,000,000 non-employer private health insurance
391,015,570 when you add the above together!
View attachment 401468CMS Fast Facts Mobile Site | CMS
Not a fan of Obamacare and its $10,000 deductibles, but where's the Republican health plan?
You can't beat something with nothing.
Explain to me these numbers and tell me WHERE there is a need for a "PLAN"???What healthcare plan was that?Not a fan of Obamacare and its $10,000 deductibles, but where's the Republican health plan?
You can't beat something with nothing.
Republicans drafted a plan that was a fraction of the size and addressed the top 10 most important issues. Dems ignored it because they wanted a 2,800 page wealth redistribution government takeover.
Next week, the Republican party takes its turn laying out a vision for the next four years under a second Trump administration. On the one hand, it is hard to know what this health policy vision could look like because there is no official Republican platform for 2020. (In fact, the website still highlights the 2016 Republican platform.) On the other, it is fair to expect more of the same—in part because very few of the Trump administration’s policies from the past three years have been implemented. This post identifies several of the Republican party’s health policy priorities since 2017 and takes stock of President Trump’s record on health care.
Why should anyone believe right wingers simply because they are on the right wing?
