Zone1 How should non-Jews fix antisemitism?

try learning some reality----the CHILDREN OF GAZA enjoy a FAR FAR better mortality rate than that of virtually ANY OTHER MUSLIM POPULATION IN THE
WORLD or any non muslim population in any shariah
shit hole. Speaking of SHAME-----examine your own dirty ass
Try to control your extreme anti-Muslim hatred.

The <5 mortality rate for Gaza and the West Bank is 16.5. I was surprised how many Muslim countries have a lower mortality rate.


But don’t let facts interfere with your bigoted rant.


It’s great you are able to assume an air of moral superiority even as you defend the killing of children.
 
Check out the facts.

try again---Begin's assertion that 'Israel had a choice' does not mean to the literate person----"WE STARTED THE WARS" In fact "CHOICE" was a very big issue in
the islamo nazi literature I read as a child (1950's) regarding the USA entry into World War II. ROFLMAO @ DONALD NEFF (known anti-semite) Is that the BEST YOU CAN DO----did you read your
idiot citation?
 
Check out the facts.

Check out the facts.

Maybe you should do the same . In 67 Nasser closed the Tiran Straits; the UN “ peacekeepers “ deliberately left . In 82 After Israel ‘s withdrawal from the Sinai there was Violence in Beirut. Lebanon and Israel invaded . Stop making excuses for the Hate that’s existed for over 2 000 years . It’s. It not healthy
 
Try to control your extreme anti-Muslim hatred.

The <5 mortality rate for Gaza and the West Bank is 16.5. I was surprised how many Muslim countries have a lower mortality rate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_and_under-five_mortality_rates#:~:text=Under-five%20mortality%20%28deaths%2F1%2C000%20live%20births%29%20–%202019%20estimates.,%20%203.0%20%20107%20more%20rows%20

But don’t let facts interfere with your bigoted rant.


It’s great you are able to assume an air of superiority even as you defend the killing of children.
feel free -----can you name shariah shitholes with the excellent records in infant mortality?
 
Maybe you should do the same . In 67 Nasser closed the Tiran Straits; the UN “ peacekeepers “ deliberately left . In 82 After Israel ‘s withdrawal from the Sinai there was Violence in Beirut. Lebanon and Israel invaded . Stop making excuses for the Hate that’s existed for over 2 000 years . It’s. It not healthy
small correction----Nasser EXPELLED the UN peacekeepers in preparation for his attack on Israel
in '67. He then lined the Border with soldiers and
tanks AND made public statements of his INTENT
to annhilate DA JOOOS
 
Maybe you should do the same . In 67 Nasser closed the Tiran Straits; the UN “ peacekeepers “ deliberately left . In 82 After Israel ‘s withdrawal from the Sinai there was Violence in Beirut. Lebanon and Israel invaded . Stop making excuses for the Hate that’s existed for over 2 000 years . It’s. It not healthy
Begin said: “In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Quote: Neither U.S. nor Israeli intelligence assessed that there was any kind of serious threat of an Egyptian attack. On the contrary, both considered the possibility that Nasser might strike first as being extremely slim.

The current Israeli Ambassador to the U.S., Michael B. Oren, acknowledged in his book “Six Days of War“, widely regarded as the definitive account of the war, that “By all reports Israel received from the Americans, and according to its own intelligence, Nasser had no interest in bloodshed”.

Link: Israel's attack on Egypt in June '67 was not 'preemptive'

Why do you keep exposing yourself as a ridiculous dunce?
 
Last edited:
Begin said: “In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Why do you keep exposing yourself as a ridiculous dunce?
ROFLMAO Right----the USA had even LESS "proof" that your hero Adolf was hostile.
 
Begin said: “In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Quote: Neither U.S. nor Israeli intelligence assessed that there was any kind of serious threat of an Egyptian attack. On the contrary, both considered the possibility that Nasser might strike first as being extremely slim.

The current Israeli Ambassador to the U.S., Michael B. Oren, acknowledged in his book “Six Days of War“, widely regarded as the definitive account of the war, that “By all reports Israel received from the Americans, and according to its own intelligence, Nasser had no interest in bloodshed”.

Link: Israel's attack on Egypt in June '67 was not 'preemptive'

Why do you keep exposing yourself as a ridiculous dunce?
you are over-interpreting in the same manner that
those who rejected the entry of the USA into world
war II have done in the past------and those who
disparage the bombing of Hiroshima. Just when
and if NASSER WOULD STRIKE THE FIRST BLOW
in June 1967 was not all that much of an issue.
His blockade of the Straits of Tiran was far more
a deciding issue as was the presence of hostile
Russian military advisors. IN FACT---the bombing
of Egyptian planes on the ground was not an issue
of "bloodshed" either----but it MOBILIZED EGYPT's
attack. Try to examine the details
 
ROFLMAO Right----the USA had even LESS "proof" that your hero Adolf was hostile.
Sorry but the Nazis worked together very nicely with the Zionists.

 
you are over-interpreting in the same manner that
those who rejected the entry of the USA into world
war II have done in the past------and those who
disparage the bombing of Hiroshima. Just when
and if NASSER WOULD STRIKE THE FIRST BLOW
in June 1967 was not all that much of an issue.
His blockade of the Straits of Tiran was far more
a deciding issue as was the presence of hostile
Russian military advisors. IN FACT---the bombing
of Egyptian planes on the ground was not an issue
of "bloodshed" either----but it MOBILIZED EGYPT's
attack. Try to examine the details
As usual irosie your post is mostly gibberish and I really don’t feel a need to respond.
 
Last edited:
Try to control your extreme anti-Muslim hatred.

The <5 mortality rate for Gaza and the West Bank is 16.5. I was surprised how many Muslim countries have a lower mortality rate.


But don’t let facts interfere with your bigoted rant.


It’s great you are able to assume an air of moral superiority even as you defend the killing of children.
Try to control your Anti Extreme Hatred, Bigotry, and Antisemitism which has existed for over 2000 years I doubt if you are even capable. 🇮🇱✡️🇮🇱
 
Begin said: “In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Quote: Neither U.S. nor Israeli intelligence assessed that there was any kind of serious threat of an Egyptian attack. On the contrary, both considered the possibility that Nasser might strike first as being extremely slim.

The current Israeli Ambassador to the U.S., Michael B. Oren, acknowledged in his book “Six Days of War“, widely regarded as the definitive account of the war, that “By all reports Israel received from the Americans, and according to its own intelligence, Nasser had no interest in bloodshed”.

Link: Israel's attack on Egypt in June '67 was not 'preemptive'

Why do you keep exposing yourself as a ridiculous dunce?
Why do you keep exposing yourself as an Ignorant Hateful Bigot? Denying that Nasser closed the Straits of Tiran?
 
Sorry but the Nazis worked together very nicely with the Zionists.

LOL another familiar islamo-nazi meme----you left out the blood in the matzoh libel
Sorry but the Nazis worked together very nicely with the Zionists.

the very first sentence of your moronic citation
belies your infinite stupidity >>>>>Both Nazism and Zionism arose in tandem from small insignificant social movements in the early part of the 20th century,
in fact ZIONISM is as old as is Judaism and what
islamo nazis like to call "political zionism" precedes
your nazism by centuries. The CURRENT zionist project began at the very outset of the 19th century---
ie beginning of the 1800s with a program to purchase
land in "palestine". Even prior to the 19th century there were movements devoted to migration BACK TO
ZION. over the past 2000 years.
 
Palestinian doctors serve Israeli patients all the time.


But you can’t recognize this because you are a contemptible bigot who only sees Palestinians as mindless savages.
You might notice that the doctors are getting PAID to work in Israel. The Israelis are treating Palestinian children for FREE.
 

Forum List

Back
Top