How small government of Republicans...

aaronleland

Diamond Member
May 19, 2012
33,897
11,331
1,430
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

This should have passed.

Text - H.R.3361 - 113th Congress 2013-2014 USA FREEDOM Act Congress.gov Library of Congress
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

This should have passed.

Text - H.R.3361 - 113th Congress 2013-2014 USA FREEDOM Act Congress.gov Library of Congress
So why did Democrats help defeat it?
 
Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:

Big government suits them a lot.

When it comes to lining the pockets of the 1% or of controlling the private lives of Americans, they're always in favor of bigger and more invasive govt.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

This should have passed.

Text - H.R.3361 - 113th Congress 2013-2014 USA FREEDOM Act Congress.gov Library of Congress

So explain line by line why it should have passed..
 
Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:

Big government suits them a lot.

When it comes to lining the pockets of the 1% or of controlling the private lives of Americans, they're always in favor of bigger and more invasive govt.

And the irony impaired far left rushes in with the standard far left propaganda..
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

The NYT reporting it doesn't mean it never happened. :lol:

Rand Paul opposed the bill because he felt it didn't go far enough. Ted Cruz supported the bill. These are your 2016 hopefuls.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

This should have passed.

Text - H.R.3361 - 113th Congress 2013-2014 USA FREEDOM Act Congress.gov Library of Congress
So why did Democrats help defeat it?

The watered down version of the USA Freedom Act that passed the house has been widely criticized by civil liberties advocates and its original supporters amongst house members for extending the Patriot Act Mass surveillance programs without meaningful restraints undermining the original purpose of the bill.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

The NYT reporting it doesn't mean it never happened. :lol:

Rand Paul opposed the bill because he felt it didn't go far enough. Ted Cruz supported the bill. These are your 2016 hopefuls.

Just like the NYTimes ignoring many things protecting Obama proves they are a far left blog site. They have been a mouth piece for the Obama White House.

Only someone blinded by far left programming would not notice such things..
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

The NYT reporting it doesn't mean it never happened. :lol:

Rand Paul opposed the bill because he felt it didn't go far enough. Ted Cruz supported the bill. These are your 2016 hopefuls.

Just like the NYTimes ignoring many things protecting Obama proves they are a far left blog site. They have been a mouth piece for the Obama White House.

Only someone blinded by far left programming would not notice such things..

Quit being lazy. I posted an article from one of the many news outlets reporting on it.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a sweeping overhaul of the once-secret National Security Agency program that collects records of Americans’ phone calls in bulk.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans who supported the measure fell two votes short of the 60 votes they needed to take up the legislation, which sponsors named the U.S.A. Freedom Act.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, worked hard to defeat the bill, which had the support of the Obama administration and a coalition of technology companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

"Quit being lazy"..

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

The NYT reporting it doesn't mean it never happened. :lol:

Rand Paul opposed the bill because he felt it didn't go far enough. Ted Cruz supported the bill. These are your 2016 hopefuls.

Just like the NYTimes ignoring many things protecting Obama proves they are a far left blog site. They have been a mouth piece for the Obama White House.

Only someone blinded by far left programming would not notice such things..

Quit being lazy. I posted an article from one of the many news outlets reporting on it.

Yes far left irony impairment is contagious..

So explain line by line why the bill should have passed..

Nor would the passage of this bill shrank the size of government.

So you create a partisan thread when really the far left was against the bill, does not help your case..
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/nsa-phone-records.html

Republicans. Always about small government until big government suits them. :doubt:


So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

"Quit being lazy"..

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

The NYT reporting it doesn't mean it never happened. :lol:

Rand Paul opposed the bill because he felt it didn't go far enough. Ted Cruz supported the bill. These are your 2016 hopefuls.

Just like the NYTimes ignoring many things protecting Obama proves they are a far left blog site. They have been a mouth piece for the Obama White House.

Only someone blinded by far left programming would not notice such things..

Quit being lazy. I posted an article from one of the many news outlets reporting on it.

Yes far left irony impairment is contagious..

So explain line by line why the bill should have passed..

Pfft. You think I've read the bill? Nobody reads those things. :eusa_hand:
 
From the link:

Under the bill, which grew out of the disclosures in June 2013 by Edward J. Snowden, the former intelligence contractor, the N.S.A. would have gotten out of the business of collecting Americans’ phone records. Instead, most of the records would have stayed in the hands of the phone companies, which would not have been required to hold them any longer than they already do for normal business purposes, which in some cases is 18 months.

WTF Republicans? Thats that small govt ideology. I wonder how long before these same repubs, who've been crying about spying by Obama, will switch back to the GWB republicans who supported all this shit in the first place.

PS. DIane Feinstein ...go to hell. There isnt a anti-terror / military event that she HASNT been for it.
 
So you use a known far left blog site like the NYtimes for your "facts"?

So why not post the bill?

Go line by line and explain to everyone why it should pass.

"Quit being lazy"..

Next thing you will be posting is that because Obamacare had the words "Affordable Care" in the title, means it was going to be affordable..

The NYT reporting it doesn't mean it never happened. :lol:

Rand Paul opposed the bill because he felt it didn't go far enough. Ted Cruz supported the bill. These are your 2016 hopefuls.

Just like the NYTimes ignoring many things protecting Obama proves they are a far left blog site. They have been a mouth piece for the Obama White House.

Only someone blinded by far left programming would not notice such things..

Quit being lazy. I posted an article from one of the many news outlets reporting on it.

Yes far left irony impairment is contagious..

So explain line by line why the bill should have passed..

Pfft. You think I've read the bill? Nobody reads those things. :eusa_hand:

So what was the point of your thread then? Especially if you nothing to support your claims..
 
From the link:

Under the bill, which grew out of the disclosures in June 2013 by Edward J. Snowden, the former intelligence contractor, the N.S.A. would have gotten out of the business of collecting Americans’ phone records. Instead, most of the records would have stayed in the hands of the phone companies, which would not have been required to hold them any longer than they already do for normal business purposes, which in some cases is 18 months.

WTF Republicans? Thats that small govt ideology. I wonder how long before these same repubs, who've been crying about spying by Obama, will switch back to the GWB republicans who supported all this shit in the first place.

PS. DIane Feinstein ...go to hell. There isnt a anti-terror / military event that she HASNT been for it.

Yes the far left will believe any far left blog site without question or hesitation..
 
From the link:

Under the bill, which grew out of the disclosures in June 2013 by Edward J. Snowden, the former intelligence contractor, the N.S.A. would have gotten out of the business of collecting Americans’ phone records. Instead, most of the records would have stayed in the hands of the phone companies, which would not have been required to hold them any longer than they already do for normal business purposes, which in some cases is 18 months.

WTF Republicans? Thats that small govt ideology. I wonder how long before these same repubs, who've been crying about spying by Obama, will switch back to the GWB republicans who supported all this shit in the first place.

PS. DIane Feinstein ...go to hell. There isnt a anti-terror / military event that she HASNT been for it.

Yes the far left will believe any far left blog site without question or hesitation..

Are you purposely being retarded? Nobody but you is disputing this happened. I'm not posting a link from another news outlet. Try Google News.
 
So explain line by line why it should have passed..

Come on, that's a ridiculous demand. If these Democrats demanded that you go line-by-line through Obamacare and explain why it shouldn't have passed, would you have done that? Of course not. Suffice it to say that government acting to protect our privacy and to enact stronger limits and protections for spying on Americans is always a good thing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top