PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Feb 24, 2014
- 44,141
- 2,773
So you couldn't answer the question and still cannot understand that marriage is not about, and never has been about, and never will be about, children. They are a byproduct of married sex, at best.None of it has to do with the marriage contract terms, shared with Infants up until 2015 when the Court decided children didn't need representation at the revision Hearing. A marriage contract was invented over a thousand years ago to provide BOTH a mother and a father to children.Sil, see if you can honestly answer this question. For the benefit of the child you can have one parent same sex, or one parent opposite sex, or two parents you don't get to pick the sex. Which one, for the child, is best?
They didn't have representation at Obergefell, two of the Justices were performing gay marriages as the question was pending before their Court. The case was a mistrial. It has to be reheard with the proper representation.
Wolves have "lovingly and successfully" raised human children. That doesn't mean we sanction "wolf marriage" where they can adopt human kids. Both mother and father are vital components of a child's life, now missing thanks to last year's High Kangaroo Court's Hearing. That will be remedied. Ask Trump about that remedy on public record..
This: "None of it has to do with the marriage contract terms, shared with Infants up until 2015..." does not exist.